Resolution of splenic injury after nonoperative management

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(94)90117-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated success with nonoperative management of splenic injuries in pediatric patients. However, the resolution of the splenic injury has not been previously evaluated. The records of 50 pediatric patients with splenic injuries from blunt trauma treated nonoperatively between 1984 to 1992 were reviewed retrospectively. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed at the time of injury and 6 weeks postinjury in 25 patients. These scans were reviewed and categorized by a modification of a previously reported grading system for parenchymal injury. All patients had healing of the splenic injuries, with complete resolution of the healing process observed at 6 weeks postinjury in 44%. Even those with shattered spleens (n = 6) had consistent improvement in splenic architecture, with resolution of fractures and/or contusions and return of splenic perfusion. Ten (77%) of 13 grade 1 and 2 injuries were completely resolved by the 6-week follow-up examination, whereas only one (8%) of 12 grade 3 to 5 injuries showed radiological resolution of splenic injuries. None of the 25 follow-up CT scans affected clinical decision-making or led to a deviation from the established protocol, which included a 3-month period of reduced activity. All 50 patients did well, without evidence of morbidity, mortality, or complications after return to full activity 3 months postinjury. These CT scan results and clinical data show (1) radiological resolution of splenic injury, with return toward a normal appearance by 6 weeks postinjury, (2) uniform success of nonoperative management of splenic injury in children, (3) that follow-up CT scans may be used to indicate earlier return to full activity in most cases of grade 1 and 2 splenic injuries, but otherwise they do not appear to contribute to the clinical management of the child after nonoperative treatment of splenic trauma.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (55)

  • Splenic Trauma in Children

    2019, Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract: 2 Volume Set
  • Management of Splenic Trauma in Children

    2012, Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract: Volume 1-2, Seventh Edition
  • Traumatic pseudoaneurysms of the liver and spleen in children: Is routine screening warranted?

    2011, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    There are no actual data provided to support this recommendation. Several studies examining the nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injuries have found that follow-up imaging does not change the course of management, and patients who do not have follow-up imaging still have good outcomes [9-19]. Li and Anchor [20] compared the self-reported practice patterns of Canadian general surgeons and pediatric general surgeons in treating blunt splenic injuries in children.

  • Management of pediatric blunt splenic injuries in Canada-practices and opinions

    2009, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    This suggests that such a practice not only leads to increased ionizing radiation exposure of the patient but also undue inconvenience on the families who often have to alter their lifestyles to accommodate their child's activity restrictions. Many studies examining the NOM of BSIs have found that follow-up imaging, when performed, does not change the course of management, and patients who do not have follow-up imaging have good outcomes regardless [16,29-35]. Our results found PGS to be more likely than GS to follow APSA guidelines for resource use.

  • Throwing out the "grade" book: management of isolated spleen and liver injury based on hemodynamic status

    2008, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Equally controversial as hemodynamic vs grade-based management is the length and type of activity restriction after hospital discharge and what, if any, follow-up imaging studies should be performed. The APSA guidelines and several other authors recommend 2 to 3 months (or up to 5 months) of “light” activity before being released to “normal” childhood activity, requiring the patient be homebound for a period ranging from 3 weeks to 3 months [17-19]. There are several hidden costs associated with this method, including lost wages or childcare costs for families who must provide care to their homebound child.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Association of Pediatric Surgeons, Cairns, Australia, May 9–14, 1993.

View full text