Gagging—a problem in prosthetic dentistry

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(70)90224-6

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volume 23, Issue 6, June 1970, Pages 614-620

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(70)90224-6 Get rights and content

Abstract

This has been a review of the current literature on the subject of gagging. Condensing all of the available thoughts on this subject will help dentists to better understand the problem of gagging.

Reference (19)

KrolA.J.
A New Approach to the Gagging Problem
J. Pros. Dent.
(1963)
ScholeM.L.
Management of the Gagging Patient
J. Pros. Dent.
(1959)
MorstadA.T.
Postinsertion Denture Problem
J. Pros. Dent.
(1968)
BorkinD.W.
Impression Technique for Patients That Gag
J. Pros. Dent.
(1959)
GuytonA.C.
ApplebyR.C. et al.
Gagging as Related to Prosthetic Dentistry
Iowa D. J.
(1956)
SchweigerJ.W.
Problems of Gagging
Iowa D. J.
(1960)
GrayH.
Anatomy of the Human Body
LevineM.
Gagging—A Problem in Prosthodontics
J. Canad. D. A.
(1960)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (38)

Virtual occlusion in orthognathic surgery
2021, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether a virtually created occlusion is as accurate as a conventionally created occlusion. Seventeen orthognathic patients were included in the study, which was conducted in a university clinic. Plaster cast models were obtained and digitized. Two experienced observers created the conventional (gold standard) and virtual occlusion to assess inter-observer variability. One observer created the conventional and virtual occlusion a second time to assess the intra-observer variability. The criterion for accepting the virtual occlusion was that the difference between the gold standard and the virtual occlusion was not larger than the intra-observer variability for the gold standard. A non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H test was performed to detect statistically significant differences between the intra- and inter-observer groups for both the conventional and virtual occlusion. No statistically significant differences were found between the different groups. The difference between the conventional and virtual occlusion group was 0.20 mm larger than the intra-observer variability of the gold standard. The virtual occlusion tool presented here can be utilized in daily clinical practice and makes the use of physical dental models redundant.
Current status of the neutral zone: A literature review
2013, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Several studies have been published on the neutral zone regarding materials, techniques, and different prostheses; however, the data are incongruent, and a literature review was necessary. This review summarizes the literature on the neutral zone and identifies deficiencies suggesting future research. The English language peer-reviewed dental literature was reviewed from the period January 1, 1900 to June 30, 2011. Articles were searched in Medline (PubMed) and Google scholar for the term “neutral zone” and were supplemented by a hand search in prosthodontic publications. Deficiencies in the literature were found, including materials and techniques for recording the neutral zone, the comparison of different neutral zone dentures, and the effect of the period of edentulism on the neutral zone.
Advancements and Applications in Digital Dentistry: A Scoping Review
2024, IFMBE Proceedings
Prosthetic management of gag reflex: Case report
2023, Tunisie Medicale
Management of Implant Screwdriver Ingestion: Reflection and Guidance for the GDP Placing Implants
2023, Dental Update
An Overview about New Methods in Management of Gag Reflex during Dental Treatment: A Systematic Review
2023, Journal of Dentistry (Iran)

View all citing articles on Scopus

^*: Associate Professor and Chairman, Department of Removable Prosthodontics.

¹: Dr. Means: 600 W St., N. W. Washington, D. C. 20001.

²: Dr. Flenniken: Box 145 Carmichaels, Pa. 15320.

View full text

Gagging—a problem in prosthetic dentistry

Abstract

J. Pros. Dent.

J. Pros. Dent.

J. Pros. Dent.

J. Pros. Dent.

Gagging as Related to Prosthetic Dentistry

Iowa D. J.

Problems of Gagging

Iowa D. J.

Anatomy of the Human Body

Gagging—A Problem in Prosthodontics

J. Canad. D. A.