NoteDefensive responses to looming visual stimuli in monkeys with unilateral striate cortex ablation
References (26)
- et al.
Plasticity in human blindsight
Vision Res.
(1982) - et al.
Transneuronal retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells after damage to striate cortex in macaque monkey: selective loss of Pβ cells
Neuroscience
(1989) - et al.
Event of emergency? Two response systems in the mammalian superior colliculus
Trends Neurosci.
(1989) Perception of impending collision in 3- to 6-week-old human infants
Infant Behav. Devl.
(1988)- et al.
Human visual responses in the absence of the geniculo-calcarine projection
Brain
(1980) - et al.
Demonstration of bilateral projection of the central retina of the monkey with horseradish peroxidase neuronography
J. comp. Neurol.
(1977) - et al.
Infant response to impending optical collision
Perception
(1980) Vision in a monkey without strite cortex: a case study
Perception
(1974)- et al.
Behavioral characteristics of children with permanent cortical visual impairment
Devl. Med. Child Neurol.
(1987) - et al.
Use of a distracting task to obtain defensive head movements to looming visual stimuli by human adults in a laboratory setting
Perception
(1992)
Beitrage zur physiologie des grosshirns
Pfluger's Arch.
The sentinel hypothesis: a role for the mammalian superior colliculus
Role of striate cortex and superior colliculus in visual guidance of saccadic eye movements in monkeys
J. Neurophysiol.
Cited by (36)
Threat detection
2021, Retinal ComputationVisual Cortex: The Eccentric Area Prostriata in the Human Brain
2018, Current BiologyCitation Excerpt :They are sometimes able to retain non-conscious visual functions, a condition known as ‘blindsight’ [13,14]. In such patients [15], and in monkeys with comparable lesions [16], looming stimuli typically elicit normal appropriate defensive reactions [17]. These observations may provide clues about the origin of the prostriata visual input, which has never been clear.
Feature Integration Drives Probabilistic Behavior in the Drosophila Escape Response
2017, NeuronCitation Excerpt :Visually evoked escape behaviors offer advantages for such circuit level investigations. Escape behaviors are ubiquitous; an approaching object (e.g., a predator) drives animals—from flies to humans—to run, jump, swim, or fly away from the threat (Card and Dickinson, 2008a; King and Cowey, 1992; Liu et al., 2011; Oliva et al., 2007; Preuss et al., 2006). These responses are readily quantifiable and often generated by circuits of identifiable neurons amenable to electrophysiology or calcium imaging.
Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains
2006, Journal of Human EvolutionCitation Excerpt :Individuals with blindsight often are still able to locate visual targets despite having no awareness of having seen the targets (Weiskrantz et al., 1974, 1995; Barbur et al., 1980, 1999; Blythe et al., 1987; Stoerig et al., 1997; for a similar phenomenon in macaques, see Cowey and Stoerig, 1997). Macaques with V1 lesions can also still move their heads away from stimuli that suddenly expand or loom at them (King and Cowey, 1992). Importantly, V1 lesions cause degeneration of most P but no K ganglion cells in the retina (Stoerig and Cowey, 1993; Cowey et al., 1994), either because retinal K cells also project to the SC and the pulvinar, which both project directly to extrastriate cortex, or because LGN K cells also send projections directly to extrastriate cortex such as MT (Yukie and Iwai, 1981; Bullier and Kennedy, 1983; Cowey and Stoerig, 1989; Stoerig and Cowey, 1993; Bullier et al., 1994; Rodman et al., 2001; Sincich et al., 2004).
Behavior and the brain
2004, Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine ScientistInnate visual object recognition in vertebrates: Some proposed pathways and mechanisms
2002, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - A Molecular and Integrative Physiology