Panel report

Is pelvic radiation beneficial in the postoperative management of stage Ib squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with pelvic node metastasis treated by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy?: A report from the presidential panel at the 1979 Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists

Data on the outcome of stage IIA1 cervical cancer is limited, as these tumors comprise a small percentage of early tumors. NCCN guidelines suggest consideration of surgical management for small tumors with vaginal involvement. Our objective was to evaluate the risk of adjuvant radiotherapy in stage IIA1 cervical cancer and its associated features, in order to improve selection of patients for surgical management.

A retrospective cohort study comparing surgically treated cervical cancer patients with stage IB1 and stage IIA1 disease. Women treated between 2000 and 2015 in ten Israeli medical centers were included. Patient and disease features were compared between stages. The relative risk (Fisher's exact test) of receiving post-operative radiation was calculated and compared for each risk factor. A general linear model (GLM) was used for multivariable analysis.

199 patients were included, of whom 21 had stage IIA1 disease. Most features were comparable for stage IB1 and stage IIA1 disease, although patients with vaginal involvement were more likely to have close surgical margins (23.8% vs 8.5%, p = 0.03). Patients with stage IIA1 disease were more likely to receive radiation after surgery (76% vs. 46%, RR = 1.65 (1.24–2.2), p = 0.011). Vaginal involvement as well as depth of stromal invasion, LVSI and lymph node metastases were independent predictors of radiation on multivariable general linear modeling.

Cervical cancer patients with vaginal involvement are highly more likely to require postoperative radiation. We recommend careful evaluation of these patients before surgical management is offered.

In 2003, we published our preliminary experience with the use of an operative technique (laterally extended parametrectomy, the LEP procedure) without adjuvant therapy, in the treatment of 29 stage IB, cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastases. In our present paper, by an extended recruiting period, with a completed 5 year follow up, we studied the outcome of LEP operations, used with the same indications.

In 70 out of 106 LEP-Wertheim operated patients, no adjuvant treatment was used. In 36 patients, where histology suggested tumor spread beyond the threshold of our surgery, adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy was advised. 5 year follow up was completed (without any patient lost for follow up) for the whole cohort of patients.

In 70 patients treated by LEP procedure alone, the overall 5-year survival was 91.4%. For those 36 patients, who were excluded due to disease spread above study criteria, 5 year survival was 44%. Complications in 10% of the cases necessitated a second operation. Apart from transient hyper continence and one case of permanent incontinence, no severe quality of life consequence of the operation was observed.

Our results suggest that in two-thirds of pelvic lymph node positive, stage IB cervical cancer cases surgery alone could provide equal or better survival (without the toxicity of chemo-radiotherapy), than any kind of multimodality treatment alternatives. LEP procedure should be considered a treatment option for stage IB cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastases.

To estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer and no evidence of metastasis as determined by combination of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

A Markov state transition model was constructed to compare two strategies: (1) radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with tailored adjuvant therapy (RH + TA); (2) primary chemoradiation (CR). Five-year survival estimates for FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer were obtained from literature. Medicare reimbursement rates and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality database were used to obtain costs of treatment regimens and grades 3–5 adverse events. Strategies were compared using incremental cost per year of life saved (YLS). Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.

Overall survival estimates were 78.9% for CR; 79.6% for RH + TA. Mean cost for CR at 5 years was $21,403 compared to $27,840 for RH + TA. RH + TA cost $63,689 per additional year of life saved (YLS) compared to CR. Results were most sensitive to survival estimates and the costs associated with high dose rate (HDR) versus low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. If 90% of patients with intermediate pathologic risk factors at surgery were assumed to receive adjuvant CR, the ICER of RH + TA rose to $100,000 per YLS compared to CR.

RH + TA is potentially cost effective when compared to CR for patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer without metastatic disease by PET/CT imaging. Key factors in the cost-effectiveness of treatments include physician's expected recommendation of adjuvant therapy, brachytherapy modality employed for primary CR and quality of life related to both treatment and its complications.