Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90005-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Theories of beauty were evaluated by requiring subjects to “evolve” a beautiful female face using a Genetic Algorithm. In this procedure, a computer program generated a small population of faces (first generation of phenotypes) from a set of random binary strings (genotypes). Genotypes specified the shapes and soft tissue anthropometrics of facial features. Each of the first generation of faces was rated by a subject (relative fitness measure) for beauty. The fittest genotypes then bred in proportion to their fitness, with crossover and mutation of the binary strings, to produce offspring which were again rated by the subject. This process continued until the most beautiful face, for that subject, was evolved. Forty Caucasian subjects (20 M, 20 F) were required to evolve their idealized beautiful female face using this procedure. The features and soft tissue anthropometrics of their final composites were compared to population norms. Also, the final composites, and different faces generated from the same data base, were rated for beauty by independent judges. The results support the conclusion that the concept of facial beauty is the result of sexual selection, and a beautiful female face has features and proportions indicative on high fertility.

References (24)

  • T.R. Alley et al.

    Average faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average

    Psychological Science

    (1991)
  • R.L. Barbieri

    The role of adipose tissue and hyperinsulinemia in the development of hyperandrogenism in women

  • P. Bjorntorp

    Adipose tissue distribution and function

    International Journal of Obesity

    (1991)
  • D.M. Buss

    Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis tested in 37 cultures

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1989)
  • C. Caldwell et al.

    Tracking a criminal suspect through “face-space” with a genetic algorithm

  • M.R. Cunningham

    Measuring the physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • R. Dawkins

    The blind watchmaker

    (1986)
  • C.M. De Ridder et al.

    Body fat mass, body fat distribution and plasma hormones in early puberty in females

    Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

    (1990)
  • D.J. Evans et al.

    Relationship of androgenic activity to body fat topography, fat cell morphology and metabolic abberations in premenopausal women

    Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

    (1983)
  • L.G. Farkas

    Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine

    (1981)
  • R.A. Fisher

    The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection

    (1930)
  • D.E. Goldberg

    Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning

    (1989)
  • Cited by (182)

    • What's in a face? Facial appearance associated with emergence but not success in entrepreneurship

      2022, Leadership Quarterly
      Citation Excerpt :

      The second facial characteristic we examine, cheekbone prominence, is the ratio of cheekbone width divided by jaw width. Research indicates that cheekbone prominence is associated with attractiveness (Tanner, 1978; Keating, Mazur, & Segall, 1981; Cunningham et al., 1990; Enlow, 1990; Johnston & Franklin, 1993; Thornhill & Gangestad, 1993; Scheib et al., 1999) – specifically, higher, wider cheekbones, and narrower cheeks are related to greater perceived attractiveness. For example, Cunningham et al. (1990) used two dimensional images of human faces from three male Caucasian populations and showed a significant association between cheekbone prominence and male attractiveness.

    • Quantitating the art and science of esthetic clinical success

      2021, Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
    • Contribution of facial components to the attractiveness of the smiling face in male and female patients: A cross-sectional correlation study

      2020, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The 60 orthodontic patients were divided into 30 men and 30 women, and some distinctions were found according to gender. Previous studies have shown that sexual dimorphism plays an essential role in attractiveness, which could explain the differences.15,31,32 Feminine and masculine faces start to become differentiated in adolescence, as a sign of sexual maturity and the search for a partner.

    • Construction of Facial Composites from Eyewitness Memory

      2023, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text