Contributions from the auditory nerve to the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs): results of intracranial recording in man

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(88)90005-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Intraoperative recordings obtained from electrodes placed on the scalp (vertex and earlobe or ear canal) in response to click stimulation were compared with recordings made directly from the auditory nerve in patients undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD) operations to relieve hemifacial spasm (HFS) and disabling positional vertigo (DPV). The results support earlier findings that show that the auditory nerve is the generator of both peak I and peak II in man, and that it is the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve that generates peak II. The results indicate that the second negative peak in the potentials recorded from the earlobe is generated by the auditory nerve where it passes through the porus acusticus into the skull cavity, and that the proximal portion of the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve generates a positive peak in the potentials that are recorded from the vertex. This peak appears with a latency that is slightly longer than that of the second negative peak in the potentials recorded from the earlobe (or ear canal). The second negative peak in the recording from the ear canal and the positive peak in the vertex recording contribute to peak II in the differentially recorded BAEP. Since our results indicate that the difference in the latency of the second negative peak in the recording from the earlobe and that of the positive peak in the vertex recording represents the neural travel time in the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve, this measure may be valuable in the differential diagnosis of eighth nerve disorders such as vascular compression syndrome.

References (41)

  • H. Engstrom et al.

    Über die Kaliberverhältnisse der Nervenfasern im N. stato-acusticus des Menschen

    Z. Mikrosk. Anat. Forsch.

    (1940)
  • P. Garg et al.

    Brainstem auditory evoked responses in hereditary motor-sensory neuropathy: site of origin of wave II

    Neurology (NY)

    (1982)
  • M.C.H. Gersdorff

    Simultaneous recordings of human auditory potentials: transtympanic electrocochleography (ECoG) and brainstem evoked potentials (ABR)

    Arch. Otolaryngol.

    (1982)
  • I. Hashimoto

    Auditory evoked potentials recorded directly from the human VIIIth nerve and brain stem: origins of their fast and slow components

  • I. Hashimoto et al.

    Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials recorded directly from human brain-stem and thalamus

    Brain

    (1981)
  • P.J. Jannetta

    Vascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia

  • P.J. Jannetta

    Hemifacial spasm

  • P.J. Jannetta

    Neurovascular cross-compression of the eighth cranial nerve in patients with vertigo and tinnitus

  • P.J. Jannetta et al.

    Disabling positional vertigo

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1984)
  • D.L. Jewett et al.

    Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from scalp of humans

    Brain

    (1971)
  • Cited by (113)

    • Auditory brainstem responses in adults with autism spectrum disorder

      2021, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Waves with numbers from III up to and including wave V are generated in the auditory brainstem. Wave III is believed to originate from the cochlear nucleus; wave IV from the SOC; and wave V from the lateral lemniscus and the inferior colliculus (Eggermont., 2019; Møller and Jannetta, 1983; Møller et al., 1988; Parkkonen et al., 2009). A large number of studies have focused on the latencies of waves I, III, and V in infants and children with ASD, and have reported prolonged absolute wave III and V latencies and interpeak latencies (IPLs) I–V, I–III, and III–V (Azouz et al., 2014; Cohen et al., 2013; Kwon et al., 2007; Magliaro et al., 2010; Maziade et al., 2000; Miron et al., 2016; Rosenblum et al., 1980; Rosenhall et al., 2003; Roth et al., 2012; Skoff et al., 1980; Taylor et al., 1982; Ververi et al., 2015).

    • Intraoperative Erb's Point-Vertex recording increases brainstem auditory evoked potential wave V amplitude

      2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      An alternative explanation of our findings could be obtained by taking into account physiological theories on active input and differential amplifiers: Cz is conventionally the reference (inverting input) of a differential amplifier so that peaks I, III and V are up-going in the displayed traces. The electrode at Cz is the physiologically active input, and EP may simply be a better differential reference compared to a mastoid site (Moller and Jannetta, 1984; Moller et al., 1988). Corroborating our findings, an amplitude increase of up to 50% could also be observed using non-cephalic electrode in healthy adults and children (Katbamna et al., 1995; McPherson et al., 1985; Pethe et al., 1998).

    • Neurophysiology of the auditory system: basics and ION techniques

      2020, Neurophysiology in Neurosurgery: A Modern Approach
    • Auditory brainstem response

      2019, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Originally it was thought that each component resulted from different sections of the brainstem and, because each was separated from the others by about 0.8 ms (approximately one synaptic delay), it was assumed that wave II originated from the cochlear nucleus, wave III from the olivary complex, and so on. Several important findings, one from correlating surface activity with depth recordings during surgery (Møller and Jannetta, 1982; Moller et al., 1988) and one from modeling experiments (Stegeman et al., 1987), have changed our interpretation considerably. Vlllth nerve recordings during surgery showed potentials corresponding in latency to scalp-recorded waves I and II.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health No. 1 R01 NS21378-03).

    View full text