Elsevier

American Journal of Otolaryngology

Volume 13, Issue 4, July–August 1992, Pages 226-233
American Journal of Otolaryngology

Original contribution
Cochlear microphonics recorded from fetal and newborn sheep

https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-0709(92)90026-PGet rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: Sounds present within the uterus stimulate the fetal inner ear and central auditory pathway. This study was undertaken to determine the efficiency of transmission of exogenous airborne stimuli to the fetal inner ear. In this way, we may quantify the extent to which the fetal auditory system is isolated from sounds produced outside the mother.

Materials and Methods: Cochlear microphonics were recorded from fetal and newborn sheep to evaluate the extent to which the fetus is isolated from sounds exogenous to the ewe. Electrodes were surgically placed in contact with the round window membrane in nine near-term fetal sheep. Cochlear microphonics were recorded in response to 13 octave-band noises (0.125 to 2.0 kHz) delivered through a loudspeaker 1.8 m from one side of the pregnant ewe. Sound pressure levels generated by the noises were simultaneously recorded ex utero with a microphone and in utero with a hydrophone previously sutured to the fetal neck. After cochlear microphonic amplitudes were recorded, the fetus was delivered through an abdominal incision. Recordings were repeated from the newborn lamb. Fetal sound isolation was calculated as the difference between the sound pressure levels that were necessary to evoke equal cochlear microphonic amplitudes from the fetus and from the newborn lamb.

Results: The sound attenuation observed was variable for all frequencies. The fetus was isolated from external sounds by 11.1 dB for 0.125 kHz, 19.8 dB for 0.25 kHz, 35.3 dB for 0.5 kHz, 38.2 dB for 1.0 kHz, and 45.0 dB for 2.0 kHz.

Conclusions: Other investigators have demonstrated that the immature auditory system is more susceptible to damage produced by noise exposure than is the mature auditory system. Low-frequency noise produces damaged cells that later in life code higher frequencies. A possibility of fetal hearing loss produced by intense noise exposure needs more careful evaluation.

References (34)

  • MR Wolfson et al.

    Emergence of the brain-stem auditory evoked potential in the premature lamb

    EEG Neurophysiol

    (1990)
  • E Douek et al.

    Effects of incubator noise on the cochlea of the newborn

    Lancet

    (1976)
  • Q Querleu et al.

    Perception auditive et reactivite foetale aux stimulations sonores

    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)

    (1981)
  • SE Armitage et al.

    The fetal sound environment of sheep

    Science

    (1980)
  • MA Vince et al.

    The sound environment of the foetal sheep

    Behavior

    (1982)
  • BA Baldwin et al.

    Recording the fetal lamb's sound environment using an implantable radio hydrophone

    Physiol Soc

    (1983)
  • KJ Gerhardt

    Characteristics of the fetal sheep sound environment

    Semin Perinatol

    (1989)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Adult-like processing of time-compressed speech by newborns: A NIRS study

      2017, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such a hypothesis predicts that adults and children can adapt to time-compressed speech, as has been observed, but that newborns, who only have experience with speech as heard in utero, which is very different from regular speech transmitted through the air, would fail. Third, it may be the case that little or no experience is needed for the adaptation ability to occur, so the degraded, low-pass filtered speech signal experienced prenatally, which only preserves the prosodic properties of the native language (Gerhardt et al., 1992; Querleu et al., 1988), may be sufficient. In this case, newborns may adapt to time-compressed speech successfully.

    • Prosodic grouping at birth

      2016, Brain and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      Speech experienced in utero, however, is different from broadcast speech transmitted through the air. Maternal tissues act as a low-pass filter, mainly transmitting sounds below 300–400 Hz (Gerhardt et al., 1992; Querleu, Renard, Versyp, Paris-Delrue, & Crèpin, 1988). As a consequence, prosody, the global melody and rhythm of speech, is relatively well preserved and transmitted to the fetal inner ear, whereas more detailed, phonetic aspects are disrupted (Querleu et al., 1988).

    • Neuromagnetic signatures of syllable processing in fetuses and infants provide no evidence for habituation

      2016, Early Human Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Animal studies with hydrophones implanted into ewe's uteri indicate that our chosen stimuli are still discernible for fetuses in utero [35,36]. However, the level of sound attenuation was associated with fetal position and status of development [37]. On the basis of the findings of AERs to the different syllables, we can safely assume that acoustic features of the syllables were transmitted to the fetus and stimulated the fetal auditory system.

    • Plasticity in early language acquisition: The effects of prenatal and early childhood experience

      2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, hearing is operational from about the 24th to 28th week of gestation [37,38••,39], so experience with spoken language starts in the womb. What spoken language sounds like in the womb is not fully known, but existing intrauterine recordings in humans and in animal models suggest that maternal tissues act as a low-pass filter at around 300–400 Hz [40–42], transmitting most of the prosody and rhythm of spoken language, but much less of the individual phonemes (possibly some aspects of the vowels, but not the consonants). It has been known that fetuses can learn from this prenatal language experience [42,43], as newborns show a preference for their mother's voice [44] and for the language heard in utero [45].

    • Human fetal response to sound

      2000, Journal de Pediatrie et de Puericulture
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant No. HD20084.

    Presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association in St Louis, MO, November 1989.

    View full text