Original contributionCochlear microphonics recorded from fetal and newborn sheep☆
References (34)
- et al.
Fetal hearing
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
(1988) - et al.
Sound environment of the fetal sheep
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1990) - et al.
Maternal vocalisations and other sounds in the fetal lamb's sound environment
Early Hum Dev
(1985) - et al.
Increasing intensities of wide band noise increase [14C] 2-deoxyglucose uptake in gerbil central auditory structures
Brain Res
(1981) - et al.
Effects of high-intensity sound on local cerebral glucose utilization in fetal sheep
Dev Brain Res
(1989) - et al.
Deoxyglucose demonstration of in utero hearing in the guinea pig fetus
Hear Res
(1987) - et al.
Fetal movements in response to sound stimulation
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1982) - et al.
Human fetal heart rate change and movement in response to sound and vibration
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1971) - et al.
Effects of vibratory acoustic stimulation on human fetal breathing and gross fetal body movements near term
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1986) - et al.
Intrauterine noise levels in pregnant ewes produced by sound applied to the abdomen
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1988)
Emergence of the brain-stem auditory evoked potential in the premature lamb
EEG Neurophysiol
Effects of incubator noise on the cochlea of the newborn
Lancet
Perception auditive et reactivite foetale aux stimulations sonores
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)
The fetal sound environment of sheep
Science
The sound environment of the foetal sheep
Behavior
Recording the fetal lamb's sound environment using an implantable radio hydrophone
Physiol Soc
Characteristics of the fetal sheep sound environment
Semin Perinatol
Cited by (46)
Adult-like processing of time-compressed speech by newborns: A NIRS study
2017, Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Such a hypothesis predicts that adults and children can adapt to time-compressed speech, as has been observed, but that newborns, who only have experience with speech as heard in utero, which is very different from regular speech transmitted through the air, would fail. Third, it may be the case that little or no experience is needed for the adaptation ability to occur, so the degraded, low-pass filtered speech signal experienced prenatally, which only preserves the prosodic properties of the native language (Gerhardt et al., 1992; Querleu et al., 1988), may be sufficient. In this case, newborns may adapt to time-compressed speech successfully.
Prosodic grouping at birth
2016, Brain and LanguageCitation Excerpt :Speech experienced in utero, however, is different from broadcast speech transmitted through the air. Maternal tissues act as a low-pass filter, mainly transmitting sounds below 300–400 Hz (Gerhardt et al., 1992; Querleu, Renard, Versyp, Paris-Delrue, & Crèpin, 1988). As a consequence, prosody, the global melody and rhythm of speech, is relatively well preserved and transmitted to the fetal inner ear, whereas more detailed, phonetic aspects are disrupted (Querleu et al., 1988).
Neuromagnetic signatures of syllable processing in fetuses and infants provide no evidence for habituation
2016, Early Human DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :Animal studies with hydrophones implanted into ewe's uteri indicate that our chosen stimuli are still discernible for fetuses in utero [35,36]. However, the level of sound attenuation was associated with fetal position and status of development [37]. On the basis of the findings of AERs to the different syllables, we can safely assume that acoustic features of the syllables were transmitted to the fetus and stimulated the fetal auditory system.
Plasticity in early language acquisition: The effects of prenatal and early childhood experience
2015, Current Opinion in NeurobiologyCitation Excerpt :However, hearing is operational from about the 24th to 28th week of gestation [37,38••,39], so experience with spoken language starts in the womb. What spoken language sounds like in the womb is not fully known, but existing intrauterine recordings in humans and in animal models suggest that maternal tissues act as a low-pass filter at around 300–400 Hz [40–42], transmitting most of the prosody and rhythm of spoken language, but much less of the individual phonemes (possibly some aspects of the vowels, but not the consonants). It has been known that fetuses can learn from this prenatal language experience [42,43], as newborns show a preference for their mother's voice [44] and for the language heard in utero [45].
Fetuses and neonates have different heart rate responses to low-intensity stimulation in quiet sleep
2000, Infant Behavior and DevelopmentHuman fetal response to sound
2000, Journal de Pediatrie et de Puericulture
- ☆
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant No. HD20084.
Presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association in St Louis, MO, November 1989.