Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 12, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 167-174
Vaccine

Paper
Comparison of influenza serological techniques by international collaborative study

https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-410X(94)90056-6Get rights and content

Abstract

An international collaborative study was performed to investigate the reproducibility of influenza serological techniques. Participants in seven laboratories representing five countries measured antibody to A/Sichuan/2/87 (H3N2), A/Taiwan/1/86 (H1N1) and B/Beijing/1/87 influenza viruses in 11 human sera and three postinfection ferret sera. Two different serological techniques were used, haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and single-radial haemolysis (SRH) and, although each technique was reproducible within laboratories, variability between laboratories was higher for H1 (maximum variability 32-fold; geometric coefficient of variation, GCV, 112%) than for SRH (maximum variability 3.8-fold; GCV 57%). The use of a standard serum allowed direct comparison of HI and SRH data and, for each technique, a standard serum improved inter-laboratory agreement. For influenza A viruses there was a correlation between HI and SRH antibodies (correlation coefficient ∼ 0.9). An HI titre of 1:40 in human sera corresponded to an SRH titre of 19–33 mm2. The results of the study indicate that two sera would be expected to contain different antibody levels if their HI titres differed by > fourfold and SRH areas differed by > 50%. Both SRH and HI possessed equivalent sensitivity for measurement of antibody to influenza A viruses but SRH was more sensitive for detection of antibody to influenza B viruses. The study provided valuable information about standardization of antibody assays.

References (24)

  • A.C. Goodeve et al.

    The use of the single radial haemolysis test for assessing antibody response and protective antibody levels in an influenza B vaccine study

    J. Biol. Stand.

    (1983)
  • P.A. Gross et al.

    Influenza vaccine in unprimed children: improved immunogenicity with few reactions following one high dose of split product vaccine

    J. Pediatrics

    (1980)
  • G.K. Hirst

    The quantitative determination of influenza virus and antibodies by means of red cell agglutination

    J. Exp. Med.

    (1942)
  • G.C. Schild et al.

    Single radial haemolysis: a new method for the assay of antibody to influenza haemagglutinin

    Bull. WHO

    (1975)
  • C.H. Stuart-Harris et al.

    Influenza: The Virus and the Disease

    (1976)
  • B.R. Murphy et al.

    Haemagglutinin specific enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies to influenza A and B viruses

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1981)
  • M. Aymard-Henry et al.

    Influenza virus neuraminidase and neuraminidase-inhibition test procedures

    Bull. WHO

    (1973)
  • D. Hobson et al.

    The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody in protection against challenge virus infection with A2 and B viruses

    J. Hyg.

    (1972)
  • P. Chakraverty

    Comparison of haemagglutination inhibition and single radial haemolysis techniques for detection of antibodies to influenza B virus

    Arch. Virol.

    (1980)
  • A.L. Frank et al.

    Microneutralization test for influenza A and B and parainfluenza 1 and 2 viruses that uses continuous cell lines and fresh serum enhancement

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1980)
  • A.S. Monto et al.

    Ether treatment of type B influenza virus antigen for the haemagglutination inhibition test

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1981)
  • P.J. Wright et al.

    A comparison of influenza B/Hong Kong infections in infants, children and young adults

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (1980)
  • Cited by (116)

    • Vaccine efficacy against Indonesian Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1: systematic review and meta-analysis

      2017, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Overall, the meta-analysis highlighted limitations of LPAI formulations against current fourth order clade viruses, inconsistent VE of alternative seed-homologous vaccines, and drawbacks of extra-label use of vaccines. Vaccine efficacy studies are affected by variability in HI titer estimation [54] and the absence of an OIE’s preferred method to identify birds shedding virus, a relevant limitation given that the ultimate aim of VE assessment is to validate and license vaccine formulations that later will be used under field conditions. In this regard, a reduced number of publications have reported the effectiveness of vaccines in Indonesia [46,55].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text