Isolation and characterization of DNA from the plasma of cancer patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5379(87)90266-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Ten out of 37 patients with advanced malignant diseases were found to have extractable amounts of DNA in their plasma whereas no DNA could be detected in 50 normal controls. After its purification from the original nucleoprotein complex, DNA plasma levels ranging from 0.15 to 12 μg/ml were measured, the lowest concentration detectable with our method being 0.1 μg/ml. Knowing from recovery experiments performed with 32P-DNA that the loss of DNA during the extraction procedure is about 65%, the real concentration of DNA in the plasma corresponds to about 3 times the given figures. The purified DNA was shown to be double-stranded and composed of fractions ranging from 21 kb to less than 0.5 kb, as determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. All these fractions hybridized with a 32P-labelled human DNA probe indicating the human origin of the bulk of the circulating DNA. In conclusion: the finding of extractable amounts of DNA in the plasma of 27% of the investigated cancer patients, and its absence from the controls, suggests some correlation with malignancy.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (306)

  • When Tissue Is the Issue: Expanding Cell-Free DNA “Liquid Biopsies” to Supernatants and Nonplasma Biofluids

    2022, Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The relative increase in serum cfDNA in patients with cancer compared with normal controls was first demonstrated in 1977.3 Stroun and colleagues4 would later report that at least some of this cfDNA was attributable to the cancer cells themselves, which was further supported by the identification of identical KRAS mutations in plasma-derived cfDNA of patients with pancreatic cancer and their corresponding tumor tissue.5 This potential of tumor-derived cfDNA in peripheral blood, also known as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), to act as a surrogate for tissue led many to theorize that a “liquid biopsy” evaluating ctDNA might become the gold standard for tumor testing, at least in certain contexts.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text