Original contribution
Signal-to-noise measures for magnetic resonance imagers

https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(93)90076-PGet rights and content

Abstract

The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in magnetic resonance imaging represents one of the system operating variables that must be determined both for evaluating the performance of different imaging protocols on a particular machine, and for monitoring machine performance as part of a routine quality control (QC) program. Utilizing a phantom and set of automated analysis programs currently under development, this study evaluated several ways of measuring image signal and noise and demonstrated the importance of utilizing measured voxel volumes as opposed to nominal volumes in the calculation of SNR. The NEMA proposed standard for SNR is compared with several other SNR measures and is recommended as the measure to be used in routine SNR reporting. The importance of utilizing other SNR measures in addition to the NEMA proposed standard for routine QC is discussed.

References (5)

  • L. Kaufman et al.

    Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1989)
  • R.M. Sano

    NEMA standards: Performance standards for clinical magnetic resonance systems

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (70)

  • Tailored magnetic resonance fingerprinting

    2023, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Characterizing Microstructural Tissue Properties in Multiple Sclerosis with Diffusion MRI at 7 T and 3 T: The Impact of the Experimental Design

    2019, Neuroscience
    Citation Excerpt :

    Diffusion data were pre-processed using FSL TOPUP and EDDY (Andersson et al., 2003; Andersson and Sotiropoulos, 2016) to correct for susceptibility-induced distortions, eddy currents and subject motion. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) values in the b0 images were calculated for each diffusion protocol in the whole brain using the difference method (Murphy et al., 1993), returning: SNR = 20.6 ± 2.2 for 3 T/low-b protocol, SNR = 15.1 ± 2.3 for 7 T/low-b protocol and SNR = 16.9 ± 1.7 for 3 T/high-b protocol. Boxplots of SNRs for the different protocols are shown in Fig. 1.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text