Original articleThe effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on the prosthesis interface in cementless arthroplasty: Evaluation in a rabbit model☆
References (21)
- et al.
Measurement of shock wave pressures used for lithotripsy
J Urol
(1986) - et al.
Use of high-energy shock waves for bone cement removal
J Arthroplasty
(1990) - et al.
Inadvertent fracture of gallstones during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
J Urol
(1986) - et al.
The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone
Clin Orthop
(1980) - et al.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
(1982) - et al.
Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants
J Biomed Mater Res
(1981) - et al.
Hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium for use as an orthopaedic biologic attachment system
Clin Orthop
(1988) - et al.
Interface mechanics and bone growth into porous CoCrMo alloy implants
Clin Orthop
(1985) - et al.
Extrakorporale Anwendung von hochenergetishen Stobwellen: ein neuer Aspeekt in der Behanlung des Harnsteinleidens
Aktuelle Urologie
(1977) - et al.
Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone
J Bone Joint Surg
(1971)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (10)
Primary stability of total hip stems: does surgical technique matter?
2019, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryApplication of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Erectile Dysfunction and Lower Urinary Tract Inflammatory Diseases
2018, Translational Research in BiomedicinePotential applications of low-energy shock waves in functional urology
2017, International Journal of UrologyBiomechanical comparison of three cemented stem removal techniques in revision hip surgery
2011, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryRetrograde cement removal in periprosthetic fractures following hip arthroplasty
2007, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
- ☆
Supported by the Zimmer Corporation and the Piedmont Orthopaedic Society.
Copyright © 1992 Published by Elsevier Inc.