American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Residual debris and bond strength—Is there a relationship?☆
References (17)
- et al.
Penetration coefficient, tensile strength and bond strength of thirteen direct bonding orthodontic cements
Am J Orthod
(1978) Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases
Am J Orthod
(1980)- et al.
Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro
Am J Orthod
(1982) - et al.
Improvements in bracket base design
Am J Orthod
(1983) - et al.
The effect of topical fluoride treameent on enamel fluoride uptake and the tensile bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin
Am J Orthod
(1985) - et al.
Evaluation of fourteen direct bonding orthodontic bases
Am J Orthod
(1980) - et al.
Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases
Am J Orthod
(1981) - et al.
Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques
Am J Orthod
(1979)
Cited by (72)
Effect of sandblasting on the shear bond strength of recycled metal brackets: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in-vitro studies
2021, International OrthodonticsCitation Excerpt :However, the focus should be to reduce the frequency of bond failures. Manufacturers have tried to improve bracket base morphology by treating the bracket base with materials [59–62]. Bracket base treatments such as microetching to increase surface area leads to an increase in SBS [30,32].
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination
2017, Journal of the Chinese Medical AssociationThe effect of orthodontic adhesive and bracket-base design in adhesive remnant index on enamel
2015, Journal of the World Federation of OrthodontistsCitation Excerpt :Most of the composite resin was left on the bracket when brackets were debonded, meaning that the bond failure occurred purely or primarily at the adhesive–enamel interface. The ARI is dependent not only on the adhesive type [29] but also on the type of bracket base used [30,31]. Bishara et al. [32], in an attempt to compare the shear bond strength of two different mesh-base designs, found no significant difference in ARIs.
Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets
2013, Oral Science InternationalCitation Excerpt :In the present investigation, the evaluation of the ARI scores indicated no significant difference in bond-failure site among the 10 groups. A previous investigation [22] suggested that the amount of residual composite might not be related to shear bond strength but it is governed by factors caused by bracket base design and properties of the adhesive. The brackets tested in the present study recorded ARI scores of “2” and “3”.
The effect of different mechanical retention forms on shear bond strength of rebonding of ceramic brackets
2024, Dental Materials Journal
- ☆
Based on a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MSc degree at the Turner Dental School, University of Manchester.
- ∗
Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics.
- ∗∗
Senior Lecturer, Department of Biomaterials.
- ∗∗∗
Consultant, Department of Orthodontics.