American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
The Nature and Management of Labor Pain: Executive summary☆,☆☆,★
Section snippets
Background: Origins and rationale for The Nature and Management of Labor Pain
Labor pain and methods to relieve it are major concerns of childbearing women and their families, with considerable implications for the course, quality, outcome, and cost of intrapartum care. Although these issues affect approximately 4 million women and families annually in the United States alone and have major consequences for health care systems, both professional and public discourse revealed considerable uncertainty, with major areas of disagreement and controversy about the safety and
Process and methods
The Maternity Center Association asked Judith Rooks to direct the project and entered into partnership with the New York Academy of Medicine for the purpose of planning and holding the symposium. The meeting was jointly sponsored by and held at the New York Academy of Medicine.
A multidisciplinary steering committee was formed comprising 12 members with expertise in anesthesiology, bioethics, childbirth education, consumer advocacy, epidemiology, journalism, labor support (doula care),
Results
The following summaries of The Nature and Management of Labor Pain project papers will provide an introduction and orientation to the papers themselves. These overviews cannot substitute for the individual papers, which are exceptionally comprehensive. Both the papers developed with the systematic review methods and their summaries below are generally longer than papers that, out of necessity, used a more conventional approach to review of literature. The summaries appear in the order of
Implications for practice
The Nature and Management of Labor Pain project has used an open and systematic process to identify and assess the best available research to answer leading questions facing professionals and childbearing women. Until they are superceded by new and updated reviews of equivalent or greater rigor, these are arguably the best available answers to the specific questions addressed.
The Steering Committee believes that the major conclusions from these papers should inform pain-related decision making
Implications for research
As is clear from the accompanying papers, this identification and summary of the best available research clarifies that many critical gaps in knowledge remain. Space limitations preclude an in-depth discussion here, and readers are referred to the papers themselves. The committee would, however, like to identify one important research gap that is evident across all of the methods papers. By and large, the comparison groups in available studies of the effects of pain relief methods reflect needs
References (49)
- et al.
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis
J Clin Epidemiol
(1995) The nature of labor pain
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002)- et al.
Anesthesia for childbirth: controversy and change
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Control Clin Trials
(1996) Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002)- et al.
Epidural analgesia side effects, co-interventions and care of women during childbirth: a systematic review
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: a systematic review
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002)
Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain: a systematic review
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Paracervical block for labor analgesia: a brief historical review
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Labor pain management in the United States: understanding patterns and the issue of choice
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Comparing the old world (before evidence based practice) and the new world (with evidence based practice)
BMJ [serial online]
Evidence-based healthcare: how to make health policy and management decisions
Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM
Systematic reviews of trials and other studies
Health Technol Assess
The Cochrane methodology register.
The Cochrane Library
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting
JAMA
Cited by (0)
- ☆
Convened by the Maternity Center Association, New York City.
- ☆☆
The views expressed by the Steering Committee do not necessarily reflect those of the agencies, institutions, and organizations with which its members are affiliated.
- ★
Reprint requests: Maureen P. Corry, MPH, Executive Director, Maternity Center Association, 281 Park Ave South, New York, NY 10010.