Does “idiopathic” preterm labor resulting in preterm birth exist?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90785-6Get rights and content

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to elucidate possible causes of preterm labor, we undertook a prospective study of 50 patients consecutively admitted with intact membranes and preterm labor who eventually had a preterm delivery despite the use of tocolysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A comprehensive evaluation plan was instituted. This included a detailed history and physical examination, targeted ultrasonography, amniocentesis for Gram stain, culture, and glucose determination, laboratory analysis for infection (complete blood cell count, urinalysis, and cervical and urine cultures) and for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (antinuclear antibody, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibody), pathologic examination of the placenta, and a urine toxicology screen.

RESULTS: The following groups of possible causes of preterm labor were identified: (1) faulty placentation, 50% (25/50); (2) intrauterine infection 38% (19/50); (3) immunologic factors, 30% (15/50); (4) cervical incompetence, 16% (8/50); (5) uterine factors, 14% (7/50); (6) maternal factors 10% (5/50); (7) trauma and surgery, 8% (4/50); (8) fetal anomalies, 6% (3/50); and (9) idiopathic conditions, 4% (2/50). Among the 50 patients two or more possible causes were identified in 58% (29/50).

CONCLUSION: We suggest that an exhaustive evaluation plan can identify possible causes in the majority (96%) of cases of “idiopathic” preterm labor that result in preterm delivery.

References (25)

  • R Romero et al.

    Infection in the pathogenesis of preterm labor

    Semin Perinatol

    (1988)
  • SG Dunlow et al.

    Microbiology of the lower genital tract and amniotic fluid in asymptomatic preterm patients with intact membranes and moderate to advanced degrees of cervical effacement and dilation

    Am J Perinatol

    (1990)
  • Cited by (136)

    • Predicting the risk of spontaneous premature births using clinical data and machine learning

      2022, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several clinical studies have identified the following as risk factors that influence sPTB: short cervix, multiple gestations, in vitro fertilization, ethnicity, stressful life events, chronic conditions such as high blood pressure and diabetes, smoking, uterine anomalies, short inter-pregnancy interval, maternal serum proteins, and prior spontaneous preterm birth [9–13]. However, most of these studies have focused on individual associations between these risk factors and sPTB rather understanding how the totality of life experiences and conditions affect sPTB risk as they interact and potentially amplify one another [14–19]. The increasing use of artificial intelligence to identify patterns, learn from experience, and make decisions has motivated recent investigations into preterm birth prediction [2,19–25].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text