Interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements,☆☆,

Presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, Anaheim, California, January 20-25, 1997.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70282-5Get rights and content

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to prospectively evaluate the interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements.

STUDY DESIGN: Forty-three women were recruited from our antepartum clinic to participate in this study. Two independent and blinded digital cervical examinations were performed by the first author and a second examiner. Instructions were given to estimate the cervical length in millimeters. After micturition endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements were performed by two independent, blinded registered diagnostic medical sonographers. Cervical lengths were compared with the Student t test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. A κ statistic was calculated for interobserver reliability at three levels of agreement ±1 mm, ±4 mm, and ±10 mm. Data are expressed as means ± SD.

RESULTS: Digital cervical lengths were not different between the two examiners (18.7 ± 4.8 mm, 20.5 ± 6.2 mm) nor between the two ultrasonographic measurements (38.6 ± 6.1 mm, 39.2 ± 5.4 mm). The digital cervical lengths agreed (±1 mm) 35% of the time (R2 0.10, p = 0.02). The endovaginal ultrasonographic measurements agreed (±1 mm) 74% of the time with a stronger correlation (R2 0.53, p = 0.0001). The κ statistic for interobserver variability was marginal for both digital and endovaginal cervical length measurements when agreement was defined as ±1 mm. Endovaginal ultrasonography was significantly more reliable than digital examination when agreement between examiners was defined as either ±4 mm or ±10 mm.

CONCLUSION: Although both digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements show correlation between examiners, endovaginal ultrasonography is significantly more reliable when agreement is defined as ≥±4 mm. Serial cervical length measurements to predict preterm labor will be enhanced by the interobserver reliability of endovaginal ultrasonography. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:853-8.)

Section snippets

Material and methods

The investigation was a prospective observational study of 43 women undergoing digital cervical examination during pregnancy. After approval by the Medical University of South Carolina Institutional Review Board, women 18 to 40 years old with singleton gestations and intact membranes between 12 and 32 weeks were recruited from among those women registering for prenatal care at the McClennan-Banks Ambulatory Care Center. Patients were targeted for recruitment if they were scheduled to have a

Results

A total of 43 women were enrolled and completed participation in the investigation. The demographic characteristics of the study population are presented in Table I.

The mean digital cervical length of examiner A was 18.7 ± 4.8 mm, which was not significantly different (p = 0.09) from the mean digital cervical length of 20.5 ± 6.7 mm estimated by examiner B. Similarly, there were no significant differences (p = 0.52) in the mean ultrasonographic cervical length measurements between technologist

Comment

Considerable work has been done to identify risk factors for preterm labor and delivery. Unfortunately, most risk assessment schemes have achieved only limited success.1 Premature cervical shortening and dilation have both been described as being associated with preterm delivery,2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and serial cervical examination has been recommended as appropriate surveillance for women at risk for preterm birth.1, 2, 3, 4, 13 A persistent concern, however, regarding digital cervical assessment

Cited by (69)

  • Fetal fibronectin test for threatened preterm delivery 48h after admission: Cost-effectiveness study

    2019, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Early discharge after a negative fFN test thus appeared to be a safe option. Ultrasound measurement of cervical length at admission made it possible to select high-risk women for PTD, but the difference of the mean cervical length between the fFN-positive and fFN-negative test groups appeared to be very small (<1–3 mm) and within the range of the observed inter- and intra-observer variability [21,22]. Therefore, the fFN test did not appear to be redundant with this parameter in our study.

  • Predictors of preterm birth

    2018, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women (preterm labor)

    2016, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction
View all citing articles on Scopus

From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina.

☆☆

Reprints not available from the authors.

0002-9378/97 $5.00 + 0 6/6/84416

View full text