Stereotactic and ultrasound core needle breast biopsy performed by surgeons**

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00199-2Get rights and content

Background

The authors evaluated outcomes and treatment costs of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) and ultrasound core needle biopsy (UCNB), and needle localization biopsy (NLB) in managing patients with mammographic abnormalities presenting to the surgeon.

Methods

Data for all patients with mammographic lesions who underwent SCNB or UCNB since their introduction at this institution were prospectively collected over 17 months. Mean inclusive costs of the three procedures were accumulated and compared.

Results

Stereotactic core needle biopsy was performed for 342 lesions in 319 women, for a malignancy rate of 19%; UCNB was performed for 157 lesions in 144 patients, yielding a malignancy rate of 17%. With a mean follow-up of 13.5 months, 1 patient with in situ carcinoma was diagnosed late. Absolute cost savings for the period studied was $721,963.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive breast biopsy procedures can safely and reliably be performed by surgeons in clinical practice with increased patient convenience and decreased costs.

References (25)

  • GisvoldJJ et al.

    Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques

    Am J Roent

    (1994)
  • JackmanRJ et al.

    Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Asymptomatic Complicated Cysts in Postmenopausal Women: Is Tissue Sampling Unnecessarily High?

      2019, Academic Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lesions lacking through transmission were usually located in the posterior depth (Fig 3) although posterior enhancement in a separate study was found to a variable degree even in simple cysts (20). Older studies suggest that FNA can readily confirm the cystic nature of a lesion and therefore recommend its routine use for all lesions described as indeterminate (7,21). Given such a low malignant potential not only in our cohort, but in other studies, these small indeterminate lesions without suspicious mammographic correlate can safely be managed with short-term follow-up and unnecessary procedures can be avoided (7,18,22).

    • Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review

      2018, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Image-guided breast biopsy is currently the gold standard for the pathologic evaluation of breast cancer. It can be performed safely and reliably with minimal invasiveness in clinical practice and with increased patient convenience and decreased cost (Roe et al. 1997). Ultrasound, stereotactic mammography, MRI and positron emission mammography (PEM) are now successfully used to guide the biopsy needle to obtain a proper tissue sample that can be histologically assessed.

    • An introduction to economic issues in breast imaging

      2000, Radiologic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lind et al33 report that patients who underwent stereotactic core biopsy had reduced total charges per cancer patient compared with needle-localized surgery cancer patients ($11,700 versus $15,654). Other studies have confirmed these findings.42,56 According to Lee et al,28 cost savings of stereotactic core procedures vary in subgroups of patients, depending on the mammographic findings.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    **

    Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Surgical Congress, Rancho Mirage, California, April 13–16, 1997.

    View full text