Responsibility and perfectionism in OCD: an experimental study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00141-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Cognitive models of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) suggest a number of different variables that may play a role in the development and maintenance of obsessive compulsive symptoms [Freeston, M. H., Rhéaume, J., & Ladouceur, R. (1996) Correcting faulty appraisals of obsessional thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 433–446]. This study's aim was to verify the effect of perfectionism and excessive responsibility on checking behaviors and related variables. Twenty-four moderately perfectionistic subjects (MP) and 27 highly perfectionistic subjects (HP) were submitted to a manipulation of responsibility (low and high). After each manipulation, they had to perform a classification task during which checking behaviors were observed. Results indicate that more checking behaviors (hesitations, checking) occurred in the high responsibility condition than in the low responsibility condition for subjects of both groups. After executing the task in the high responsibility condition, HP subjects reported more influence over and responsibility for negative consequences than MP subjects. These results suggest that high perfectionistic tendencies could predispose individuals to overestimate their perceived responsibility for negative events. Furthermore, perfectionism could be conceived as playing a catalytic role in the perception of responsibility. Results are discussed according to cognitive models of OCD.

Introduction

Behavior therapy is faced with some limits for the treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Almost 25% of patients refuse this type of treatment and approximately 25% do not benefit from it (Foa, Steketee, Grayson, & Doppelt, 1983). Cognitive therapy is considered as an alternative or as a complement to traditional behavioral treatments (e.g. van Oppen & Arntz, 1994; van Oppen et al., 1995; Freeston et al., 1996). In these circumstances, it is important to know and understand the cognitive variables that are involved in OCD in order to find effective ways of correcting cognitive distortions. Dysfunctional perfectionism and excessive responsibility have been identified as part of the five main cognitive variables associated with OCD (McFall & Wollersheim, 1979; Freeston et al., 1996); the other principal variables being overestimation of the importance of thoughts, overestimation of danger and the belief that anxiety caused by thoughts is unacceptable.

Recent definitions of responsibility and perfectionism contribute to our understanding of the role these variables play in OCD. Excessive or inflated responsibility has been defined as the belief which is pivotal to bring about or prevent subjectively crucial negative outcomes. They may be actual, that is, having consequences in the real world and/or at a moral level (Salkovskis et al., 1996). This definition has been empirically supported using a semi-idiographic questionnaire (e.g. Rhéaume, Ladouceur, Freeston, & Letarte, 1995c) as well as with experimental manipulations of responsibility (e.g. Ladouceur et al., 1995; Ladouceur, Rhéaume, & Aublet, 1997).

The unidimensional definition of perfectionism used in this study is: `the belief that a perfect state exists that one should try to attain' (Pacht, 1984). According to this perspective, which is particularly pertinent in the study of OCD (Rhéaume, Freeston, Dugas, Letarte, & Ladouceur, 1995a), perfection does not exist and the attempt to attain this perfect state would be associated with psychopathology. Hamachek (1978) points out that perfectionism can be a positive personality trait and distinguishes between sane and pathological perfectionism. The Perfectionism Questionnaire was devised to measure this construct with respect to the distinction between functional and dysfunctional perfectionism. The criterion and convergent validity of this instrument were established with questionnaire (Rhéaume, Freeston, & Ladouceur, 1995) and behavior manipulation studies (Rhéaume et al., 1995b).

In the past few years, the concept of excessive responsibility has received a lot of attention (Cottraux, 1990, Salkovskis, 1989; Rachman, 1993; Rhéaume, Ladouceur, Freeston, & Letarte, 1994; Tallis, 1994; van Oppen & Arntz, 1994; Rhéaume et al., 1995). Salkovskis (1985), Salkovskis (1989) made a great contribution to this theory by proposing a theoretical model whereby an excessive sense of responsibility is at the core of OCD. According to this model, obsessional patients would appraise intrusive thoughts as a function of possible harm to themselves or others. This excessive sense of responsibility would produce automatic negative thoughts, and discomfort would arise. The individual would then attempt to reduce the anxiety through cognitive neutralization or compulsive behavior (e.g. checking repetitively). Many studies support this model. In a number of clinical studies, the presence of an excessive sense of responsibility was observed in OC patients (Salkovskis, 1989; van Oppen et al., 1995; Ladouceur, Léger, Rhéaume, & Dubé, 1996). Furthermore, questionnaire studies comparing OC patients to control subjects support the existence of a link between responsibility and OC-type behaviors (Freeston, Ladouceur, Gagnon, & Thibodeau, 1992Freeston, Ladouceur, Gagnon, & Thibodeau, 1993; Rhéaume et al., 1995a). Finally, two recent experimental studies manipulated the level of perceived responsibility. Lopatka and Rachman (1995) succeeded in changing the perceived responsibility for negative consequences in thirty compulsive checkers. As expected, the lowering of responsibility was associated with a significant drop in discomfort and need to check. Lastly, two studies experimentally manipulated responsibility in nonclinical subjects (Ladouceur et al., 1995, Ladouceur et al., 1997). Results showed that checking behaviors were more frequent in the group receiving high responsibility instructions compared to controls.

On the other hand, although it has been suggested for many years that perfectionism also plays a key role in OCD (Hamachek, 1978; Burns, 1980; Pacht, 1984; Rasmussen & Eisen, 1989), this variable has not yet been fully studied. At the clinical level, Ladouceur et al. (1996) observed that perfectionism was a common characteristic in a group of OC patients without manifest compulsions, while responsibility was clearly less apparent in those same subjects. Correlational studies have shown a significant link between perfectionism and OC symptoms (Hewitt & Flett, 1991; Hewitt, Flett, & Turnbull, 1992). Furthermore, two correlational studies using the Maudsley OC symptom checklist with analogue subjects have shown that participants with OC tendencies were more perfectionistic than noncompulsive individuals (Frost, Steketee, Cohn, & Griess, 1994) and were also more perfectionistic than nonanxious controls (Gershuny & Sher, 1995). Finally, in a recent experimental study using a variety of tasks with nonclinical subjects, dysfunctional perfectionists obtained higher scores on the Padua Inventory and performed more poorly in precision and decision making tasks compared to functional perfectionists. These results support the link between perfectionism and OC symptoms (Rhéaume et al., 1995b).

At this point in time, the links between perfectionism and responsibility remain obscure. Studies conducted by Rhéaume et al. (e.g. Rhéaume et al., 1995a; Rhéaume, Ladouceur, & Freeston, 1998) have shown that responsibility and perfectionism are good independent predictors of OC symptoms. Nonetheless, little is known about the nature of the relationship between these two important factors. Considering the recent developments in cognitive therapy (e.g. van Oppen et al., 1995; Ladouceur et al., 1996; Freeston et al., 1997), it appears necessary to investigate how perfectionism and responsibility are linked together and to OC symptoms, in order to develop specific cognitive interventions adapted to this population.

The aim of the current study is to explore the links between perfectionism and excessive responsibility. This relationship will be studied by increasing and lowering perceived responsibility in subjects showing different degrees of perfectionism. We will verify if perfectionism, together with an excessive sense of responsibility, has an impact on the appraisal of intrusions and whether they predispose individuals to show OC tendencies. It is expected that highly perfectionistic subjects will show more OC-type behaviors and will attribute more responsibility to themselves than moderately perfectionistic subjects. In the high responsibility condition, we should observe, for both groups, more OC-type behaviors than in the low responsibility condition. Furthermore, this increase in checking and other related behaviors should be more marked in highly perfectionistic subjects than in moderately perfectionistic subjects.

Section snippets

Participants

Fifty-one adults from a nonclinical population participated in the study (41 women, 10 men, mean age 23.3 years). Subjects were recruited through questionnaire studies conducted in university classes. Subjects participating in the study were eligible for a draw prize of CAN$50. In order to increase the credibility of the task, subjects were not to be psychology students and not to have already participated in a laboratory study. Subjects were selected on the basis of their scores on the PQ. Two

Manipulation checks

A t-test on the integrity variable revealed a significant difference between the HP group and the MP group on their score on the perfectionistic tendencies subscale of the PQ (t=−19.88, p<0.0001). The HP group reported significantly more perfectionistic tendencies than the MP group. The two groups also differed on their score on the negative consequences subscale of the PQ (t=−5.19, p<0.0001), the HP group reporting significantly more negative consequences related to their perfectionistic

Discussion

This study's aim was to explore the links between perfectionism and excessive or inflated responsibility; two variables associated with OC behaviors. This relationship was studied by comparing how highly and moderately perfectionistic individuals react when submitted to a decrease and increase of responsibility. Results indicate that there are more checking behaviors (hesitations and checking) when responsibility is increased, and this holds for both groups. This result suggests a relationship

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted while the first author was supported by the Fonds pour la Recherche en Santé du Québec and while the third author received grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada and the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec.

References (33)

  • P.M. Salkovskis

    Cognitive behavioural factors and the persistence of intrusive thoughts in obsessional problems

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1989)
  • F. Tallis

    Obsessions, responsibility and guilt: two case reports suggesting a common and specific etiology

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1994)
  • P. van Oppen et al.

    Cognitive therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1994)
  • P. van Oppen et al.

    Cognitive therapy and exposure in vivo in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1995)
  • D. Burns

    The perfectionist's script for self-defeat

    Psychology Today

    (1980)
  • J. Cottraux

    Therapie cognitive des obsessions-compulsions

    Encephale

    (1990)
  • Cited by (104)

    • Cognitive Beliefs Across the Symptom Dimensions of Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Type of Symptom Matters

      2022, Behavior Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies have found a heightened sense of responsibility for harm in individuals with intrusive cognitions (Freestone et al., 1997; Rhéaume et al., 1995; Salkovskis et al., 2000). Additionally, an increased sense of responsibility has been identified as one of the strongest predictors of obsessional symptoms and has been shown to impact the frequency of compulsive behavior (Bouchard et al., 1999; Lopatka & Rachman, 1995; Salkovskis et al., 2000; Shafran, 1997). Research on adult OCD has also found this cognitive domain to be associated with symptoms related to doubting/checking and being responsible for harm (Brakoulias et al., 2014; Wheaton et al., 2010).

    • Responsibility causes reassurance seeking, too: An experimental investigation

      2019, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Multiple methods for manipulating responsibility have been employed. These include contracts to assign blame in case of improper task completion (Lopatka & Rachman, 1995; Radomsky, Rachman, & Hammond, 2001), the presence (vs. absence) of the experimenter (Shafran, 1997), whether the task was a mundane laboratory test or could have real-world implications (Arntz et al., 2007; Bouchard, Rhéaume, & Ladouceur, 1999; Ladouceur et al., 1995), and leading participants to believe that incorrect task performance could result in (mild and temporary) harm to another person (Boschen & Vuksanovic, 2007; Reeves, Reynolds, Coker, & Wilson, 2010). Across the above-mentioned studies, increased responsibility resulted in increased urges to check and checking behaviour.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text