Congenital absence of the penis: With embryological considerations

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(48)80006-8Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (10)

  • JohnsonF.P.

    J. Urol.

    (1920)
  • BarsteinN.J. et al.

    Anat. Rec.

    (1938)
  • FrumkinA.P.

    American Review of Soviet Medicine

    (1944)
  • HamiltonW.J. et al.

    Human Embryology

    (1945)
  • HarrisR.P.

    Phila. med. J.

    (1898)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (118)

  • The tube in tube thoracodorsal perforator flap phalloplasty

    2023, Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthetique
  • Abdominal phalloplasty

    2023, Atlas of Operative Techniques in Gender Affirmation Surgery
  • A modified microvascular “Tube-in-Tube” concept for penile construction in female-to-male transsexuals: Combined radial forearm free flap with anterolateral thigh flap

    2021, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Phalloplasty, the creation of the “ideal” neophallus, is an ongoing challenge in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Such procedures are commonly indicated in various conditions such as congenital malformation, absence of the penis, or post-traumatic reconstruction1. In particular, the steady increase of gender reassignment is a driving force for the development of new methods and surgical techniques to enable plastic surgeons to fulfill the growing medical need for phalloplasty2,3.

  • Genital Gender Confirmation Surgery for Patients Assigned Female at Birth

    2019, Comprehensive Care of the Transgender Patient
View all citing articles on Scopus

Paper presented at the Combined Meeting of the American and British Associations of Plastic Surgeons, Tennessee, May 1947

*

Anatomy Department, Charing Cross Hospital Medical School

View full text