Simple classification of renal calculi closely related to their micromorphology and etiology
Introduction
Initial studies on urinary calculi were developed before 1800 by Scheele (1742–1786) and Bergman (1734–1794), who firstly identified uric acid calculi. The chemical characterization of urinary calculi was initiated by J.F. Heller in the nineteenth century, who in 1860 proposed a scheme for chemical investigation of urinary calculi based on the colour, hardness and chemical reactions performed directly on the dry material. In fact, these studies on renal calculi can be considered the beginning of modern Clinical Chemistry [1]. In spite of this early commencement that suggested that this pathology would be one of the first to be solved, it was not and still now there are diverse aspects that need to be clarified.
The analysis of renal calculi implying wet chemistry qualitative reactions in order to identify the different anions and cations present in the calculus was the unique methodology used during the first four decades of the twentieth century and in fact, this process is still often applied in routine clinical laboratories using specifically designed kits [2]. Unfortunately, the inadequacies of elemental chemical methods of calculi analysis were not recognized until the beginning of 1950, when it was demonstrated that the structure and internal arrangement of calculi, crucial in determining the mechanism of formation of the different kinds of stones, were impossible to identify using chemical methods and it was necessary to use compositional physical techniques, like X-ray diffraction. Thus, in 1947 appeared Prien's papers [3], [4] in which it was clearly pointed out that the lack of basic and fundamental knowledge concerning the exact composition of renal calculi was largely due to inadequate methods of analysis. These papers constituted the first attempt to set up a classification of renal calculi useful for clinical purposes and also the first effort to find the relationships between pathogenesis, structure and composition of calculi, yet no connections with urinary parameters were established. The papers published in the following two decades [5], [6], [7], [8] must be considered in the same line. Thereafter, new detailed studies on the composition and micromorphology of renal stones that incorporate scanning electron microscopy as a fundamental tool appeared [9], [10]. Finally, in 1993, Daudon et al. [11] established the first classification of renal calculi with a clear correlation with the main urinary etiologic conditions. However, this information is complex and probably is difficult to adapt to clinical routine practice, in spite of its interest for scientific purposes. Consequently, it is necessary to establish a classification of renal calculi, in accordance to its composition and fine structure, clearly correlated with specific pathophysiologycal conditions as the main urinary alterations, adapted to the common clinical practice, thus providing important information about calculus treatment. The objective of this paper is to contribute to establish such a classification.
Section snippets
Patients
Our study included 1799 patients who produced 2443 renal calculi. From these stone-formers, the urine of 700 individuals chosen randomly have been analyzed and the results compared with those obtained from 51 healthy subjects. Both groups had similar age and sex distribution.
Urinary calculi studies
The two thousand and four hundred forty-three renal calculi have been studied following the procedure indicated below.
Stones were dried once collected, stored in sterile containers and immediately studied.
The used procedure
Results
Considering the nature of the majority components, the presence of minute substances and their location, as well as the etiologic factors that could be deduced from the calculus macro and microstructure, 2500 studied renal calculi have been classified in the 11 main groups that appear in Table 2. The main urinary alterations more frequently associated to each group are also indicated in Table 3. As can be seen, the calcium oxalate dihydrate calculi were the most abundant (33.8%) and they were
Discussion
The majority of existing renal calculi, based on their composition, fine inner structure and occurrence of an attachment site to the papilla, can be classified into 11 principal categories (Table 2). The classification presented enables to establish a close relationship between common urinary etiologic factors of calculogenesis and the main types of renal calculi (Table 3). Likewise, on the one hand, it permits to simplify the urinary biochemical studies, by direct search for the common
References (20)
The chemistry of urinary stones around 1800: a first in clinical chemistry
Kidney Int.
(1995)Strategies and methods for the analytical investigation of urinary calculi
Clin. Chim. Acta
(1986)Studies in urolithiasis: II. Relationships between pathogenesis, structure and composition of calculi
J. Urol.
(1949)Structure and composition of urinary calculi
J. Urol.
(1973)Observations on the analysis of ten thousand urinary calculi
J. Urol.
(1962)- et al.
Protective effects of heparin and other sulfated glycosaminoglycans on crystal adhesion to injured urothelium
J. Urol.
(1982) - et al.
Adhesion, internalization and metabolism of calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals by renal epithelial cells
Kidney Int.
(1997) - et al.
Infection stones
J. Urol.
(1989) Inhibitors and promoters of stone formation
Kidney Int.
(1978)- et al.
Studies in urolithiasis: I. The composition of urinary calculi
J. Urol.
(1947)
Cited by (128)
Validation of a novel diagnostic test for assessing the risk of urinary uric acid crystallization
2021, Clinica Chimica ActaEndoscopic identification of urinary stone composition: A study of South Eastern Group for Urolithiasis Research (SEGUR 2)
2021, Actas Urologicas EspanolasRare non-papillary lithiasis of calcium oxalate monohydrate generated on a central core of potassium urate
2021, Urology Case ReportsCitation Excerpt :Knowledge of the macro and micro components that form a calculus alone cannot determine the sequence of steps resulting in its formation. Nevertheless, analysis of its morphological aspects is essential, as knowledge of the morphology and composition of a calculus can determine both the causes of and the steps involved in its formation.1,2 Although we had examined more than 14,000 stones, we had never detected a non-papillary COM calculus inside a renal infundibulum, in which the center of the calculus consisted of potassium urate, with COM crystals forming around this central core.