Traumatic injuries of the distal femoral physis. Retrospective study on 151 cases☆
Introduction
The lower femoral epiphyseal plate contributes 70% of the longitudinal growth of the femur and 40% of the overall growth of the lower extremity [1]. Injury of the distal femoral physis is not uncommon and rather a serious injury [2].
Salter and Harris [3], produced a widely used classification. They believed that this classification would be of a great prognostic value and might be useful in making decision for treatment. We undertook this study to report the outcome in 151 cases of traumatic injuries of the distal femoral physis.
Section snippets
Methods
A retrospective review was carried out of 151 patients with traumatic injuries of the distal femoral physis managed at University of Alexandria Hospitals, Alexandria, Egypt between 1980 and 1996. All patients were followed-up until complete fusion of the distal femoral growth plate. Children with associated neurologic abnormalities, muscular dystrophy, metabolic bone disease, congenital abnormality of the skeleton and inflammatory joint disease were excluded from this study.
All patients were
Incidence
There were 129 male and 22 female patients, a ratio of approximately 6:1. The average age at injury was 12.3 years ranging from 10 months to 16 years and 9 months. These were 11 injuries (7.3%) in children under the age of 2 years. In the juvenile age, range 2 to less than 11 years, there were 49 injuries (32.4%) while 91 patients (60.3%) were injured in the adolescent age range (11 years or more). The injury was on the left side in 91 (60.3%) and on the right in 60 patients (39.7%).
Mechanism of injury and associated injuries
Discussion
The epiphysis at the distal femur is the largest and fastest growing in the body. Its injury is more common than injuries of growth plates elsewhere in the lower limb. From one century to the next, the clinical presentation of distal femoral physeal injuries has changed considerably. Previously the concern was the management of the injury in the acute phase. Currently, the main concern is the premature closure of the physis leading to progressive angulation and shortening, and dealing with
Conclusions
Many of the patients with this injury are healthy youngsters. With appropriate treatment, they should return to normal activities. For younger children with remaining growth, the potential for shortening and angular deformity is significant. We stress the point that a child with a physeal fracture of the distal femoral growth plate should be followed clinically and radiologically for at least few years after injury and preferably until skeletal maturity. Compartment syndrome should always be
References (11)
- et al.
Fractures of the distal femoral epiphysis
Clin. Orthop.
(1965) Fractures and separations of the knee
- et al.
Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.
(1963) - et al.
Injuries of the distal femoral growth plate and epiphysis: should open reduction be performed?
Aust. N. Z. J. Surg.
(1993) - et al.
Fractures involving the distal femoral epiphyseal growth line
South. Med. J.
(1962)
Cited by (91)
Lower extremity physeal fractures and post-traumatic surgical deformities; National Trauma Data Bank and institutional cohorts
2022, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and TraumaInjuries to the distal femur and patella
2020, Surgery (United Kingdom)Citation Excerpt :MRI is useful in detecting a physeal bar early. These patients should be followed up for several years, ideally until maturity.13 Ligamentous stability should be evaluated after the fracture has healed.
Paediatric injuries around the knee: Bony injuries
2020, InjuryCitation Excerpt :In the distal femur however, there is a reported rate of growth disturbance of 58% [12]. If the fracture is undisplaced, it can be treated non-operatively by immobilising the limb in a cast [5]. If it is displaced the literature favours open or closed reduction with fixation.
- ☆
Study conducted at the University of Alexandria Hospitals, Alexandria, Egypt.