Long-term functional outcome assessment of plate fixation and autogenous bone grafting for clavicular non-union
Introduction
Clavicular fractures are estimated to constitute between 5 and 10% of adult skeletal trauma presenting to the fracture clinic.4 Despite this, progression to non-union is rare with an incidence between 0.1 and 1%.15 When this complication occurs, the residual problems incurred by the patient are often significant, including not only pain, but also disability and often a considerable upper limb functional deficit.12., 15., 17. Optimal treatment for post-traumatic clavicular non-union is often debated and previous studies have described plate,8., 9., 12., 13., 14., 18. intramedullary,1 and external fixation.16
Open reduction and internal fixation with a compression plate and bone grafting is currently the most accepted technique,2., 5., 7., 17. producing consistently good outcomes in a number of series.5., 7., 14. Information regarding long-term extremity function is rarely reported, as most studies identify bone healing and resolution of pain as end points of treatment. Therefore the objective of this study was to study long-term functional outcome after treatment for clavicular non-union with a reliable and validated assessment tool. Subsequently, possible causes for poor outcomes in these patients were analysed.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
We retrospectively analysed chart, radiological and operative data on all patients operated upon for clavicular non-union over a 7-year period. Thirty non-unions were identified in 29 patients, with one patient having bilateral injuries. All patients identified had been symptomatic for 16 weeks prior to the diagnosis of non-union. Open reduction and internal fixation was performed by a number of experienced consultants, with reconstruction plates being used in seven patients and dynamic
Results
There were no immediate post-operative complications, however two patients developed long-term complications including one patient with a reflex sympathetic dystrophy and one patient with a deep local infection, which necessitated plate removal.
Discussion
The clavicle has a pivotal role in the biomechanical function of the pectoral girdle and also the function of the upper limb.11 Given this importance, much interest has been focused on the optimal method of treatment for patients with clavicular non-union. The underlying theme in many papers is to analyse the pre-disposing causes for non-union17 and early symptomatic or radiological outcome.5., 7., 8., 9., 10., 12., 13., 14. Our report is unique in that it analyses the long-term functional
Conclusions
We conclude that open reduction and internal fixation with bone grafting gives good long-term functional and radiological results in clavicular non-union with most patients returning to a functional level close to the general population. However, patients known to have co-morbid conditions, compromised post-operative function and these co-morbidities should, if possible, be concomitantly treated.
References (18)
- et al.
Low-contact dynamic compression plating of the clavicle
Injury
(1994) Non-union of fractures of the mid-shaft of the clavicle
J. Bone Joint Surg.
(1991)- et al.
Clavicular non-union: 31/32 healed after plate fixation and bone grafting
Acta Orthop. Scand.
(1996) - et al.
Normative data for the SF-36® version II from the Oxford Healthy Lifestyle Survey III
J. Public Health Med.
(2000) - Craig EV. Fractures of the clavicle. In: Rockwood Jr CA, Matsen III FA, editors. The shoulder, vol. 1. Philadelphia:...
- et al.
Operative treatment for delayed and non-union of midshaft clavicular fractures
J. Trauma
(1996) - et al.
Clavicular fracture non-union surgical outcomes and complications
Injury
(2002) - et al.
Open reduction and internal fixation with bone grafting of clavicular non-union
J. Trauma
(1997) - et al.
Treatment of post-traumatic clavicular pseudo-arthrosis
Acta Orthop. Scand.
(1977)
Cited by (31)
Arthroscopic-Assisted Bone Graft Harvest From the Proximal Humerus for Distal Third Clavicle Fracture Nonunion
2020, Arthroscopy TechniquesCorrective osteotomy in symptomatic clavicular malunion using computer-assisted 3-D planning and patient-specific surgical guides
2018, Journal of OrthopaedicsCitation Excerpt :Moreover there is often an esthetic component with shortening and “ptosis” of the shoulder. Although an osteotomy that simply corrects the length can improve some of these symptoms, it is important to note that apparently some degree of residual shoulder dysfunction is expected postoperatively if not performed correctly.8,9 Although all publications specifically addressing clavicle osteotomies did report improvement, none of these patients had a normal shoulder outcome score.
Late recurrent peripheral upper limb ischemia after non-union of a clavicle fracture
2015, InjuryCitation Excerpt :Compression plating and autologous bone grafting is the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic clavicle non-union. Stable and rigid fixation is desirable in order to reach bone healing and early functional recovery [25–27]. Biomechanical studies suggest that superior plating compared with anterior plating can give greater stability despite the detriment of a higher incidence of hardware-related symptoms and risk of damages to neurovascular structures.
Management of clavicle nonunion and malunion
2013, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Moreover, clavicle nonunion is frequently hypertrophic, and compression plating is capable of providing a rigid and length-stable construct in nearly all situations. Available literature suggests that bony union can be reliably achieved after surgical management of clavicle nonunion or malunions.14,42,43 Both superior and anteroinferior plating techniques have resulted in satisfactory union rates in the setting of clavicle nonunion.
Surgical management of uncomplicated midshaft clavicle fractures: A comparison between titanium elastic nails and small reconstruction plates
2012, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Although the first 4 patients in the TEN group were not completely satisfied because of implant-related complications, with greater surgical experience and adjustment of TEN positioning, the latter patients were all satisfied. Although reconstruction plates provide primary rigid fixation, time to subjective pain relief is dependent on repair of a large surgical wound and periosteal dissection.5,16 In addition to the preclusion of shoulder exercises by the 3- to 6-week requirement for arm sling protection after SRP fixation, restoration of shoulder joint motion might be delayed in consideration of potential loosening of screws in osteoporotic bone.2