Masquelet technique: myth or reality? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction
The induced membrane technique (IMT) firstly described by Masquelet et al. is a two-step procedure to treat bone defects and non-unions [1]. Masquelet describes an initial debridement of soft tissues and necrotic bone to bleeding healthy tissue (“paprika sign”), and the use of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement spacer placed in the bony defect, which is stabilised with a temporary external fixator [2, 3]. During the initial stage, soft tissue reconstruction is required if coverage is inadequate [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8].
The role of the spacer is two-fold; it prevents fibrous tissue invasion of the defect area, whilst inducing the development of a surrounding pseudo-synovial membrane, as a result of a foreign body reaction [9]. After 6–8 weeks, the second step is undertaken. The induced membrane is carefully incised and the spacer removed. Morcellized cancellous bone from the iliac crest is implanted and the membrane closed with definitive fixation [1].
The membrane is key to provide a vascular source to the bone graft [10] and also secretes growth factors (such as BMP-2, VEGF and TGF-beta1) [9]. The autologous bone graft is then able to allow osteoconduction (acting as a scaffold), osteoinduction and osteogenesis (containing further growth factors and osteoprogenitor cells) [11]. Several small case series reports have demonstrated the efficiency of IMT, particularly in post-traumatic defects, septic and aseptic nonunions, tumor resections, and irradiated bones.
The original technique has been modified in a variety of ways and includes the use of antibiotic-coated or impregnated spacers (used in septic pseudoarthroses and infected bone resections) [2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15], internal and/or definitive fixation during the first stage [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19] and utilisation of spongy autograft obtained through the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) technique [4, 5, 6, 7, 12]. Hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate bone substitutes, as well as demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and demineralized bovine bone (DBB) have been added to the graft to increase graft volume [1, 2, 6, 7, 12, 20]. The addition of growth factors, such as BMP-7, has been used to improve osteoinductivity [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13], and non-vascularized or vascularized bone grafts can provide additional structural support [1, 3, 6, 7, 8].
In spite of these modifications, a systematic review evaluating the impact of these on the efficacy of the Masquelet technique, is still absent in the medical literature. Therefore, in this systematic review we aim to evaluate the impact of these variants on the efficacy of IMT, specifically comparing infection eradication and union rates for long bones defects and non-union in adults.
Section snippets
Methods
In agreement with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement for Individual Patient Data (PRISMA-IPD), a systematic review of the medical literature was carried out. PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Embase, Science Direct, Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords “Masquelet technique” and “induced membrane technique,” from 2000 until the end of July 2016 (Figure 1). Original articles written in English, French, or Italian reporting more than 5 cases of
Results
Six hundred and twenty-eight papers were initially identified and screened (Figure 1). After duplicates were excluded, 19 studies were read in full to assess their relevance to this study. Seventeen studies [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] reporting aggregate data met our inclusion criteria, with 427 patients undergoing IMT.
The mean age of included patients was 39.03 (range 15–84), and included substantially more males (353,82.7%), with a mean follow-up of 15.75
Discussion
Masquelet et al. first presented the induced membrane technique in 1986, publishing a case series 14 years later [1]. The technique underwent several changes, and has been employed in different contexts and different methodology.
This is, to our knowledge the first systematic review aimed at analysing the results of the application of the IMT in septic and aseptic non-unions, osteomyelitis, traumatic bone losses and tumor resections in adult patients.
The bone defects ranged from 0.6 to 26 cm [12
Conclusions
Strategies related to bone repair are evolving aiming to reduce the time to union, morbidity and functional impairment [45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51].
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review concerning the IMT in the medical literature. IMT seems to be effective in infection eradication and in the treatment of non-unions even if employed for large bone defects (>20 cm). Further studies are needed to confirm this result, calculate the impact of surgical variants and patient-associated
Declaration of conflicting interests
All named authors hereby declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors
Ethical approval
Not required
References (51)
- et al.
Two-stage reconstruction of post-traumatic segmental tibia bone loss with nailing
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
(2010) - et al.
French Society of Orthopaedic S, et al. Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
(2012) - et al.
Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: a review of 25 cases
Injury
(2010) - et al.
[Induced membrane technique for the reconstruction of bone defects in upper limb. A prospective single center study of nine cases]
Chir Main
(2011) - et al.
Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration
J Orthop Res
(2004) - et al.
Masquelet technique for the treatment of bone defects: tips-tricks and future directions
Injury
(2011) - et al.
Treatment of atrophic tibia non-unions according to “diamond concept”: Results of one- and two-step treatment
Injury
(2015) - et al.
Reconstruction of septic diaphyseal bone defects with the induced membrane technique
Injury
(2015) - et al.
The Masquelet technique of induced membrane for healing of bone defects. A review of 8 cases
Injury
(2015) - et al.
Traumatic diaphyseal bone defects in children
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
(2012)