Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss

doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00113-5

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volume 41, Issue 2, February 2004, Pages 141-150

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00113-5 Get rights and content

Abstract

Novice qualitative researchers are often unsure regarding the analysis of their data and, where grounded theory is chosen, they may be uncertain regarding the differences that now exist between the approaches of Glaser and Strauss, who together first described the method. These two approaches are compared in relation to roots and divergences, role of induction, deduction and verification, ways in which data are coded and the format of generated theory. Personal experience of developing as a ground theorist is used to illustrate some of the key differences. A conclusion is drawn that, rather than debate relative merits of the two approaches, suggests that novice researchers need to select the method that best suits their cognitive style and develop analytic skills through doing research.

Section snippets

Background

This paper developed from the experience of learning to use grounded theory to carry out a study, still in progress, about post-registration professional development of nurses. Novice qualitative researchers are often unsure of how to analyse their data, particularly in relation to grounded theory and differences that have developed between the approaches of Glaser and Strauss, who first jointly described the method (Glaser and Strauss, 1967). Unlike quantitative research, where time is spent

Conclusion

Glaser (1998) suggests that researchers should stop talking about grounded theory and get on with doing it, which seems like good advice. The novice researcher should set aside ‘doing it right’ anxiety, adhere to the principle of constant comparison, theoretical sampling and emergence and discover which approach helps them best to achieve the balance between interpretation and data that produces a grounded theory. It is worth bearing in mind that qualitative analysis is a cognitive process and

References (39)

P. Ashworth
Variety in qualitative research, Part 2on positivist approaches
Nurse Education Today
(1997)
M. Annells
Grounded theory method Part 2options for users of the method
Nursing Inquiry
(1996)
C. Baker et al.
Method slurring the grounded theory—phenomenology example
Journal of Advanced Nursing
(1992)
P.H. Becker
Common pitfalls in published grounded theory
Qualitative Health Research
(1993)
H. Blumer
Social psychology
H. Blumer
Sociological analysis and the variable
American Sociological Review
(1956)
M. Bulmer
Research questions and hypothesis block 2, Part 1. Research methods in education and social sciences
(1979)
W.C. Chenitz et al.
Qualitative research using grounded theory
C.H. Cooley
Human Nature and the Social Order
(1922)
J.R. Cutcliffe
Methodological issues in grounded theory
Journal of Advanced Nursing
(2000)

J. Dickoff et al.

A theory of theoriesa position paper

Nursing Research

(1968)

P.A. Field

Doing fieldwork in your own culture

D. Freshwater

Transformatory Learning in Nurse Educationa Reflexive Action Research Study

(2000)

B. Glaser

Theoretical Sensitivity

(1978)

B. Glaser

Emergence v Forcing Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis

(1992)

B. Glaser

Doing Grounded TheoryIssues and Discussion

(1998)

B. Glaser

Keynote address for the fourth annual qualitative health research conference

Qualitative Health Research

(1999)

B. Glaser et al.

The Discovery of Grounded Theory

(1967)

M. Hammersley

The Dilemma of Qualitative MethodHerbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition

(1989)

Cited by (389)

Motivations for investigating health inequities in observational epidemiology: a content analysis of 320 studies
2024, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
To enhance equity in clinical and epidemiological research, it is crucial to understand researcher motivations for conducting equity-relevant studies. Therefore, we evaluated author motivations in a randomly selected sample of equity-relevant observational studies published during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We searched MEDLINE for studies from 2020 to 2022, resulting in 16,828 references. We randomly selected 320 studies purposefully sampled across income setting (high vs low–middle-income), COVID-19 topic (vs non–COVID-19), and focus on populations experiencing inequities. Of those, 206 explicitly mentioned motivations which we analyzed thematically. We used discourse analysis to investigate the reasons behind emerging motivations.
We identified the following motivations: (1) examining health disparities, (2) tackling social determinants to improve access, and (3) addressing knowledge gaps in health equity. Discourse analysis showed motivations stem from commitments to social justice and recognizing the importance of highlighting it in research. Other discourses included aspiring to improve health-care efficiency, wanting to understand cause-effect relationships, and seeking to contribute to an equitable evidence base.
Understanding researchers' motivations for assessing health equity can aid in developing guidance that tailors to their needs. We will consider these motivations in developing and sharing equity guidance to better meet researchers' needs.
Understanding IT professional innovative work behavior in the workplace: A sequential mixed-methods design
2024, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
In response to the pandemic, business leaders are increasingly investing in technology to enhance work processes. However, there is a gap in understanding how innovative work behavior (IWB) can facilitate this digital transformation and improve Information Technology (IT) helpdesk services. This study, guided by social exchange theory, explores the dimensions of IWB for IT helpdesk support staff using a mixed method design. Through a sequential exploratory approach, combining qualitative literature review and in-depth interviews, coupled with a quantitative survey of 440 IT staff, this study validates and establishes the reliability of an IWB measurement scale. Our results reveal eight dimensions of IWB: opportunity exploration, idea sharing, idea generation, idea implementation, idea organization, idea learning, idea promotion, and idea realization. These dimensions constitute a valid and reliable scale that organizations can utilize for self-assessment and employee development, as well as for identifying policy-related barriers to innovative work behaviors within the company.
Parental representations: Discourse analysis of parents of 4-month-old children in France
2023, Neuropsychiatrie de l'Enfance et de l'Adolescence
La place de l’enfant dans notre société a largement évolué au cours des dernières décennies. Cela s’est traduit par de nombreuses politiques publiques visant à lutter contre les inégalités sociales de santé dès le plus jeune âge. Le soutien à la parentalité est l’une des stratégies mises en place et vise notamment à renforcer les liens d’attachement et à favoriser le développement de l’enfant. La qualité de l’attachement et des interactions parents–enfants est corrélée aux représentations que les parents ont de leurs enfants. L’objectif de l’étude est de rapporter les représentations actuelles des parents sur les nouveau-nés dans la population française en général.
Dans le cadre de l’étude PERL, une étude annexe a été menée sur les représentations parentales. Les entretiens ont été réalisés auprès des familles témoins. L’analyse s’est basée sur la méthode des catégories conceptuelles pour faire ressortir les éléments saillants relatifs aux représentations parentales et aux sentiments associés à la parentalité.
Parmi les discours analysés, les parents ont construit leurs représentations de leur enfant, dès les 4 mois de l’enfant. Ces représentations identifient l’enfant de 4 mois comme étant capable de faire des choix, d’avoir des préférences, d’agir dans l’environnement et de communiquer avec les autres. De plus, la représentation que les parents ont d’eux-mêmes met en évidence les divers sentiments éprouvés à l’égard de la parentalité, de l’exercice de ce nouveau rôle et des nouveaux comportements parentaux envers l’enfant, suite à la perturbation de l’exercice de la parentalité. Les parents éprouvent également divers sentiments associés à la parentalité, à l’exercice de ce nouveau rôle.
The child's place in our society has largely evolved over the past few decades. This has led to numerous public policies to tackle social inequalities in health care from an early age. Parenting support is one of the enhanced strategy actions and aims put in place, in particular, to strengthen the bonds of attachment and promote a child's development. The quality of attachment and parent–child interactions is correlated with parents’ representations of their children. The objective of the study is to report current parental representations of newborn children in the French population in general.
As part of the PERL study, an ancillary study was conducted on parental representations. The interviews were conducted with the control families. The analysis was based on the method of conceptual categories in order to bring out the salient elements relating to parental representations and feelings associated with parenthood.
Among the analyzed discourses, parents have constructed the representations of their child, from the child's age of 4 months. These representations identify the 4-month-old child as being capable of making choices, having preferences, acting in the environment, and communicating with others. In addition, parents’ representations of themselves highlighted various feelings experienced concerning parenthood, the exercise of this new role, and the new parental behaviors towards the child, as a result of the disruption of being a parent. Parents also experienced a variety of feelings associated with parenting, parenthood, and their new role.
Local contextual factors of child stunting found via shared values of stakeholder groups: An exploratory case study in Kaffrine, Senegal
2023, Public Health Nutrition
Sociocultural environmental factors and childhood stunting: Qualitative studies - A protocol for the Shared Values theme of the UKRI GCRF Action Against Stunting Hub
2024, BMJ Paediatrics Open
Monitoring Crime Victims’ Barriers to Legal Needs during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining the Utility of Interrupted Time Series for Surveilling Community Data
2024, Victims and Offenders

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

ReviewDeveloping a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss

Abstract

Section snippets

Background

Conclusion

Nurse Education Today

Grounded theory method Part 2options for users of the method

Nursing Inquiry

Method slurring the grounded theory—phenomenology example

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Common pitfalls in published grounded theory

Qualitative Health Research

Social psychology

Sociological analysis and the variable

American Sociological Review

Research questions and hypothesis block 2, Part 1. Research methods in education and social sciences

Qualitative research using grounded theory

Human Nature and the Social Order

Methodological issues in grounded theory

Journal of Advanced Nursing

A theory of theoriesa position paper

Nursing Research

Doing fieldwork in your own culture

Transformatory Learning in Nurse Educationa Reflexive Action Research Study

Theoretical Sensitivity

Emergence v Forcing Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis

Doing Grounded TheoryIssues and Discussion

Keynote address for the fourth annual qualitative health research conference

Qualitative Health Research

The Discovery of Grounded Theory

The Dilemma of Qualitative MethodHerbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition

Review
Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss