A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods
References (12)
A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—Application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
Math Model
(1986)Some confounding factors in the study of mortality and occupational exposures
Am J Epidemiol
(1982)A new theory of causality in observational survival studies—Application to the healthy worker effect
Biometrics
(1985)A statistical method to control for the healthy worker effect in intracohort comparisons
Am J Epidemiol
(1984)Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randpmization
Ann Stat
(1978)Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: Extensions of the Mantel—Haenszel procedure
J Am Stat Assoc
(1963)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (244)
Population health science as a unifying foundation for translational clinical and public health research
2022, SSM - Population HealthIdentification in nonparametric models for dynamic treatment effects
2021, Journal of EconometricsCitation Excerpt :Knowledge about the optimal treatment regime may be useful for policies, e.g., by at least excluding sequences that are suboptimal. Dynamic treatment effects have been extensively studied in the biostatistics literature for decades under the counterfactual framework with a sequence of treatments (Robins (1986, 1987, 1997) and Murphy et al. (2001), Murphy (2003), among others). In this literature, the crucial condition used to identify the average potential outcome is a dynamic version of a random assignment assumption, called the sequential randomization.
Adjusting for Time-Varying Treatment Switches in Randomized Clinical Trials: The Danger of Extrapolation and How to Address It
2024, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
Copyright © 1987 Published by Elsevier Inc.