Impact of bicycle helmet safety legislation on children admitted to a regional pediatric trauma center

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90454-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: The regional pediatric trauma center in Buffalo, NY, has been active in pediatric injury prevention programs, including community education and distribution of bicycle helmets, since 1990. Since June 1, 1994, the use of bicycle safety helmets for children under 14 years of age has been mandated by a state law in New York. The authors undertook this study to assess the impact of this legislation on the frequency of helmet use in children involved in bicycle crashes presenting to the regional pediatric trauma center, and to assess the impact of helmet use on the number and severity of head injuries.

Methods: Bicycle crash victims (n = 208) admitted to a regional pediatric trauma center from 1993 to 1995 were studied retrospectively. Head injuries were classified as concussion alone, skull fractures, intracranial hemorrhages (ie, epidural, subdural, and subarachnoid), cerebral contusions, or diffuse cerebral edema alone (without any other intracranial injury). Helmeted children (HC) were compared with nonhelmeted children (NHC) using χ2 and Fisher's Exact test. P value less than .05 was considered significant.

Results: Only 31 children (15%) wore helmets at the time of the crash. Helmet use increased from 2%, during the period of education alone, to 26% after the legislation went into effect (P < .00001). The proportion of children suffering head injuries was similar in both groups (HC, 68%; NHC, 61%; P = NS). However, the type of head injury was different. HC were more likely to sustain concussion alone (HC, 65%; NHC, 44%; P < .03). HC were less likely to have skull fractures (HC, 0%; NHC, 13%; P < .02), and exhibited a trend toward less intracranial hemorrhages (HC, 0%; NHC, 9%; P = NS), cerebral contusions (HC, 3%; NHC, 5%; P = NS), and cerebral edema (HC, 0%; NHC, 0.6%; P = NS). Excluding the isolated concussions, head injuries were noted in only one HC, compared with 30 NHC (P < .04). None of the three children who died wore helmets at the time of the crash, and all died of multiple head injuries.

Conclusions: The bicycle helmet safety law resulted in a 13-fold increase in the use of bicycle helmets among the children admitted to a regional pediatric trauma center after bicycle crashes, but the helmet use remains inadequate. Helmet use reduced the severity of head injuries, and might have prevented deaths caused by head injuries.

References (39)

  • S Thomas et al.

    Effectiveness of bicycle helmets in preventing head injury in children: Case-control study

    Br Med J

    (1994)
  • BH Rowe et al.

    Bicyclist and environmental factors associated with fatal bicycle-related trauma in Ontario

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1995)
  • G Li et al.

    Factors related to the presence of head injury in bicycle-related pediatric trauma patients

    J Trauma

    (1995)
  • KA Finvers et al.

    The effect of bicycling helmets in preventing significant bicycle-related injuries in children

    Clin J Sport Med

    (1996)
  • U Bjornstig et al.

    Head and face injuries in bicyclists-with special reference to possible effects of helmet use

    J Trauma

    (1992)
  • DC Thompson et al.

    Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing head injuries: A case-control study

    JAMA

    (1996)
  • GB Rodgers

    Bicycle helmet use patterns among children

    Pediatrics

    (1996)
  • DC Thompson et al.

    Incidence of bicyclerelated injuries in a defined population

    Am J Public Health

    (1990)
  • BD Weiss

    Bicycle helmet use by children

    Pediatrics

    (1986)
  • Cited by (66)

    • Understanding children's cycling route selection through spatial trajectory data mining

      2023, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
    • Helmet Usage Reduces Serious Head Injury Without Decreasing Concussion After Bicycle Riders Crash

      2021, Journal of Surgical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other studies have shown a reduction in head injuries6,9,10 though most of these studies do not differentiate between minor and major head injuries. Some studies have shown no difference in head injury5,6 when concussion was included as a head injury, although in the former study,5 the helmeted patients were less likely to have a skull fracture although more likely to have a concussion. Overall the proportion of riders with head injuries was 68% versus 61% (P = NS) in helmeted versus nonhelmeted riders, respectively, with serious head injuries less common in helmeted riders.

    • Cycling fatalities: When a helmet is useless and when it might save your life

      2018, Safety Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additional safety measures are focused on the physical separation of cyclists from traffic (Bíl et al., 2010; Kaplan and Prato, 2015), marking separated cycling lines (e.g., Hamann and Peek-Asa, 2013) or calming of traffic when sharing the same place with cars (Chen and Shen, 2016). Numerous studies and meta-studies have investigated the contribution of helmets to the prospects of cyclists after crashes (e.g., Uibel et al., 2012; Bambach et al., 2013, Gomei et al., 2013; Dinh et al., 2015), either focusing on specific head injuries (Finvers et al., 1996, Jacobson et al., 1998; Attewell et al., 2001; Gomei et al., 2013), or including intracranial ones (Wasserman and Buccini, 1990; Shafi et al., 1998). Whereas some studies have been based on statistical data analyses (where helmet use ranked among the parameters), other studies involved theoretical conducting simulations (e.g., McNally and Whitehead, 2013) or were based on laboratory testing (e. g., Mills and Gilchrist, 2008; Pang et al., 2009; Mattei et al., 2012; Cripton et al., 2014).

    • Examples in biomechanics

      2018, Engineering Standards for Forensic Application
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association, Naples, Florida, May 18–21, 1997.

    View full text