The impact of post preparation on the residual dentin thickness of maxillary molars

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60119-4Get rights and content

Statement of problem

The oval-shaped palatal roots of maxillary molars usually have smaller cross-sectional diameter in the buccolingual direction. However, the effect of parallel-sided post preparation on the remaining dentin thickness of root canal walls is unknown.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate, in vitro, the residual dentin thickness (RDT) of palatal roots in maxillary molars after various intracanal procedures for post placement, and to determine the risk of root canal perforation or weakening on different root canal walls at 2 levels, coronal and apical.

Material and Methods

Fifteen extracted first maxillary molars exhibiting radiographic mesiodistal root canal widths ranging from 3.8 to 4.2 mm, measured at 5 mm from the apex, were selected from a pool of teeth. The teeth were horizontally sectioned at 2 levels, coronal and apical, after being embedded in acrylic resin with the aid of a metal index, allowing identical repositioning of the sectioned parts throughout the study. Each sectioned surface was photographed with a digital camera coupled to a microscope. The palatal roots were subsequently prepared for post placement as follows: endodontic preparation up to file K50, Largo 3 and 4 drills, and ParaPost 4.5 and 5.0. Cross-sections were rephotographed after each step. Image J software was used to measure the RDT of each root wall at both levels, and data were further analyzed with a 3-way ANOVA/General Linear Model (GLM) for repeated measures. The post-hoc Tukey's range test was used to calculate differences in RDT among the 4 root walls at each root level (α=.05).

Results

A significant difference was observed among the intracanal procedures (P<.001). At the apical level, RDT was significantly lower after ParaPost preparation than at the coronal level (P=.009). Buccal and palatal walls displayed significantly lower RDT than the mesial and distal walls at both levels (P=.004).

Conclusions

Intracanal preparation up to ParaPost 5.0 increased the risk of perforation or weakening of the buccal and palatal walls, especially at the apical level.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

This in vitro repeated-measure study, approved by the ethical committee at the University Center of Maranhão, included 15 teeth from a pool of 33 first maxillary molars, selected according to the radiographic mesiodistal thickness of the palatal root. A sequence of intracanal preparations was performed on the palatal root. After each preparation stage for post placement (before preparation, after hand instrumentation, after Largo reamer enlargement, and after ParaPost preparation) standardized

Results

Table I shows means and standard deviations for RDT on each post space wall and at sectioned levels after each stage of the preparation for post placement. The 3-way ANOVA (Table II) indicated a significant reduction in RDT after each stage of the post space preparation at both levels (P<.001). Comparing the levels, a significant difference in dentin reduction was detected only after the use of a ParaPost drill; here the reduction was significantly higher at the apical level than at the coronal

Discussion

A significant difference in the RDT of root canal walls at both levels was observed after post preparation with the ParaPost system. Thus the null hypothesis was rejected. A significant reduction in RDT after each stage of preparation for post placement at the palatal root of maxillary molars at both levels was observed (P<.001). This is consistent with previous studies that demonstrated a significant reduction in RDT after the subsequent stages for post preparation using the ParaPost System.5,

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, intracanal preparation up to a parallel-sided ParaPost 5.0 drill increased the risk of perforation or weakening of the root in the buccal and palatal aspects, especially at the apical level.

Cited by (22)

  • Cone beam computed tomography analysis of residual dentin thickness after virtual post placement in the palatal roots of maxillary first molars

    2022, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    The percentage of molars with inadequate or no RDT was approximately 85.7% when the largest post size (1.14 mm) was examined at 5 mm from the apex. These findings are consistent with those of a previous study when a larger post size (1.25 mm) was compared, although the sample size was smaller.24 In contrast with previous in vitro studies,5,22-24,27 the present investigation assessed the use of posts in palatal roots without using extracted teeth.

  • Remaining dentinal thickness after simulated post space preparation and the fit of prefabricated posts to root canal preparation shapes

    2021, Journal of the American Dental Association
    Citation Excerpt :

    Additional studies with other assumptions and their permutations are suggested in association with the assessment of progressive root morphology in other populations. We highlighted that, if posts are placed to 5 mm from the apical terminus, particular canals demonstrate higher levels of likelihood of violating the 1-mm rule, which can be interpreted as a proportionate risk of experiencing perforation or future root fracture, which is in agreement with other studies.27,28 Therefore, there is a higher risk of sustaining iatrogenic damage when preparing for a post in mandibular incisors and buccal and distal canals of molars.29

  • Microcomputer tomography measurement of minimum residual dentin thickness in mandibular first molars after virtual fiber post placement

    2020, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    In this study, the mean mRDT at the mesial side of distal roots was less than 1 mm (0.95 ±0.35 mm) after root canal preparation, and after post placement, the values were 0.76 ±0.34 mm for post #1, 0.63 ±0.35 mm for post #2, 0.52 ±0.35 mm for post #3, and 0.41 ±0.33 mm for post #4, which was acceptable for clinical application. Root anatomy is another important factor affecting RDT, which gradually decreases with the distance from the root canal orifice.6-8 The presence of oval roots with a buccolingual diameter much wider than the mesial-distal diameter is another factor affecting RDT.10,27,29,30

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the International Association for Dental Research (IADR) annual meeting, Barcelona, Spain, July 2010.

View full text