Classification of Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction: Ambiguous Terminology of the Budd-Chiari Syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(12)62109-0Get rights and content

Severe hepatic venous outflow obstruction and its manifestations often are recorded under the label “Budd-Chiari syndrome.” Unfortunately, this label is ambiguous; it does not clearly identify the site of the lesion (hepatic veins versus inferior vena cava), its morphologic features (thrombotic versus nonthrombotic), or its cause. In the literature, implied or expressed definitions vary. Use of a standardized topographic and pathogenetic classification of hepatic venous outflow obstruction would enable investigators to group patients with comparable conditions, as required for therapeutic trials, prognostic evaluations, and studies of pathogenetic pathways. Review of our own cases revealed that hepatic venous outflow obstruction involving large hepatic veins is usually thrombotic and that isolated obstruction of the inferior vena cava or of small hepatic veins is usually nonthrombotic. Application of such a classification seems feasible and may yield useful results.

Section snippets

DEFINITION OF BCS

Review of the literature and our own experiences suggests that the following definition of BCS currently would be the most useful:

BCS consists of hepatic venous outflow obstruction and its manifestations, regardless of cause, the obstruction being either within the liver or in the IVC between the liver and the right atrium. Functional hepatic venous outflow obstruction caused by congestive heart failure is not considered BCS.

Commonly, heart disease other than constrictive pericarditis is

DIAGNOSIS OF BCS

In our opinion, the diagnosis of BCS should be used sparingly; this label is appropriate primarily for cases of HVOO before the type and location of the obstruction are known. For the treatment of individual patients, for therapeutic trials, and for other retrospective and prospective studies of HVOO, a more detailed pathogenetic classification is needed. For any such classification, the components of the hepatic venous outflow tract must be well defined by radiologic and other

APPLICATION OF CLASSIFICATION

For preparation of Table 3 (and thus testing of the proposed classification), we retrieved all Mayo Clinic cases of BCS and HVOO that had been recorded during the 12-year period from 1976 to 1987. We identified 62 patients who fulfilled the previously stated definition of BCS; some patients from this group had already been described in a previous publication from this institution.17 In 21 instances, morphologic data were unobtainable or insufficient; therefore, these patients were excluded from

DISCUSSION

Although most clinicians implicitly use in their publications a classification similar to the one described herein, that information rarely is communicated. We believe that use of a standardized classification would facilitate therapeutic trials, prognostic evaluations, and study of pathogenetic pathways. Obviously, for patient management, many other factors should be considered, such as the degree of liver dysfunction and the duration of the disease. For diagnostic considerations, the data

CONCLUSION

We prefer not to use the term BCS or, if that cannot be achieved, to apply it only to the symptom complex of noncardiogenic HVOO either (1) before complete diagnostic workup of a patient or (2) as a collective term for all cases in a study. For patient management and all other purposes—in particular, publication of therapeutic trials and prognostic evaluations—specific etiologic and pathogenetic designations should be used. For example, a diagnostic group could be described as “HVOO, IVC,

REFERENCES (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (193)

  • Vascular Disorders

    2023, MacSween's Pathology of the Liver, Eighth Edition
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text