Treatment of Hip Instability

Treatment of hip instability

Inpatient dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered a nonreimbursable “never event” by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. There is extensive evidence that technical procedural factors affect dislocation risk, but less is known about the influence of nontechnical factors. We evaluated inpatient dislocation trends after elective primary THA and identified patient and hospital characteristics associated with the occurrence of dislocation.

We used discharge records from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2002-2011). Temporal trends were assessed, and multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with dislocation.

The in-hospital dislocation rate increased from 0.025% in 2002 to 0.15% in 2011, despite a downward trend in length of stay (P < .001). Patient characteristics associated with the occurrence of dislocation were black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, lower household income, and Medicaid insurance. Comorbidities associated with dislocation included hemiparesis/hemiplegia, drug use disorder, chronic renal failure, psychosis, and obesity. Dislocations were less likely to occur at teaching hospitals and in the South.

The in-hospital dislocation rate after elective primary THA is increasing, in spite of shorter stays and surgical advances over time. Given the sociodemographic disparities in dislocation risk documented herein, interventions to address social determinants of health might do as much or more to reduce the occurrence of dislocation than technical improvements.

The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of larger femoral head diameters, in combination with recent practice including enhanced soft tissue choices and various operative exposure choices has led to any further decline in dislocation rates. 51,901 patients undergoing primary THA were identified from 5% Medicare Part B (physician/carrier) claims between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2011. Dislocation rate at 6 months following THA was 2.84% over the study period (1997–2011). From 2005 to 2011, dislocation rates following primary THA have plateaued in the United States at approximately 2%. This suggests that the full benefits using large femoral head sizes are now realized. For further improvement in dislocation rates, a greater emphasis will be required on patient selection, surgical technique and component alignment.

Instability of artificial joints is still one of the most prevalent reasons for revision surgery caused by various influencing factors. In order to investigate instability mechanisms such as dislocation under reproducible, physiologically realistic boundary conditions, a novel test approach is introduced by means of a hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) simulation involving a highly flexible mechatronic test system. In this work, the underlying concept and implementation of all required units is presented enabling comparable investigations of different total hip and knee replacements, respectively. The HiL joint simulator consists of two units: a physical setup composed of a six-axes industrial robot and a numerical multibody model running in real-time. Within the multibody model, the anatomical environment of the considered joint is represented such that the soft tissue response is accounted for during an instability event. Hence, the robot loads and moves the real implant components according to the information provided by the multibody model while transferring back the position and resisting moment recorded. Functionality of the simulator is proved by testing the underlying control principles, and verified by reproducing the dislocation process of a standard total hip replacement. HiL simulations provide a new biomechanical testing tool for analyzing different joint replacement systems with respect to their instability behavior under realistic movements and physiological load conditions.

To study the influences of head/neck ratio and femoral antetorsion on the safe-zone of operative acetabular orientations, which meets the criteria for desired range of motion (ROM) for activities of daily living in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

A three-dimensional generic, parametric and kinematic simulation module of THA was developed to analyze the cup safe-zone and the optimum combination of cup and neck antetorsion. A ROM of flexion ≥ 120°, internal rotation ≥45° at 90° flexion, extension ≥30° and external rotation ≥ 40° was defined as the criteria for desired ROM for activities of daily living. The cup safe-zone was defined as the area that fulfills all the criteria of desired ROM before the neck impinged on the liner of the cup. For a fixed stem-neck (CCD)-angle of 130°, theoretical safe-zones fulfilling the desired ROM were investigated at different general head-neck ratios (GR=2, 2.17, 2.37, 2.61 and 2.92) and femoral anteversions (FA=0°, 10°, 20° and 30°).

Large GRs greatly increased the size of safe-zones and when the CCD-angle was 130°, a GR>2.37 could further increase the size of safe-zones. There was a complex interplay between the orientation angles of the femoral and acetabular components. When the CCD-angle was 130°, the optimum relationship between operative acetabular ante-version (OA) and femoral antetorsion (FA) could be estimated by the formula: OA=-0.80×FA+47.06, and the minimum allowable operative acetabular inclination (OI_min) would be more than 210.5xGR²²⁵⁵.

Large GRs greatly increase the size of safe-zones and it is recommended that the GR be more than 2.37 so as to extend the acceptable range of error that surgeons cannot avoid completely during operation. As to the optimum operative acetabular inclination (OI), surgeons need to make a decision combining with other factors, including stress distribution, soft tissue and cup wear conditions, as well as patients' individual situations and demands. The data obtained from this study and the module of THA can be used to assist surgeons to choose and implant appropriate implants.

Dislocation remains a serious complication of total hip replacement. An insufficient range of motion can lead to impingement of the prosthetic neck on the acetabular cup. Together with the initiation of subluxation and dislocation, recurrent impingement can cause material failure in the liner. The objective of this study was to generate a validated finite element (FE) model capable of predicting the dislocation stability of different femoral head sizes with regard to impingement in different implant positions as well as the corresponding stress distribution in the liner. In order to cover posterior and anterior dislocation, two total hip dislocation associated manoeuvres were simulated using a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model. The dislocation stability of two head sizes was determined numerically and experimentally. After validation, the FE model was used to analyse the dislocation stability of four different head sizes in variable implant positions. Range of motion (ROM) until impingement, the resisting moment that was developed and ROM until dislocation were evaluated. Additionally, stress distribution within the polyethylene liner during impingement and subluxation was determined. For both dislocation modes, a cup position of 45° lateral abduction and 15° up to 30° anteversion resulted in appropriate ROM and dislocation stability. In general, larger head diameters revealed an increase in ROM and higher resisting moments. Stress analysis showed decreased contact pressures at the egress site of the liners with the larger inner diameters during subluxation. The analysis shows that an optimal implant position and a larger head diameter can reduce the risk of dislocation induced by impingement. The finite element model that was developed enables simplification of design variations compared to experimental studies since prototyping and assembling are replaced by prompt numerical simulation.