PERIAMPULLARY CANCERS: Are There Differences?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70142-0Get rights and content

By definition, periampullary cancers arise within 2 cm of the major papilla in the duodenum. They encompass four different types of cancers: ampullary (ampulla of Vater), biliary (intrapancreatic distal bile duct), pancreatic (head–uncinate process), and duodenal (mainly from the second portion). Although these tumors have different origins, the complex regional anatomy and their proximation within that confined region generally dictate a common operative approach. Radical resections, such as the Whipple procedure 62 or its variant with preservation of the pylorus with or without extended regional lymphadenectomy,58 have been the main treatments for these cancers, especially with the currently low morbidity and mortality rates.67 Although the perioperative outcomes for these different cancers are similar, the long-term survival has traditionally varied. Consequently, because exact tumor origin is often difficult to clinically ascertain, surgeons have favored an aggressive approach toward resection to benefit those patients harboring cancers with a better prognosis. This observation has intrigued physicians managing patients with these cancers. It is unknown why outcome should vary for adenocarcinomas arising from different anatomic sites in such close proximity. Indeed, if survival does vary significantly for these cancers as clinical impression suggests, clearly, factors other than anatomy alone must be involved.

This article explores whether there are differences in the clinical behavior of the periampullary cancers and defines which of these factors, if any, affect outcome. Moreover, it is important to determine which factors are valuable clinically so that they can be used to improve overall survival rates.

Section snippets

Epidemiologic Considerations Prevalence Of Periampullary Cancers

Overall, periampullary cancers account for 5% of all gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Pancreatic cancer occurs most often among the periampullary cancers. They account for 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. Cancers of the ampulla of Vater occur more frequently than distal common bile duct cancer with a ratio of 1:12.5 In autopsy studies, the overall prevalence of periampullary cancers is between 0.063% and 0.21%.5, 42, 65 Considered separately, carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater has been

Outcome Studies Support Variable Survival

Representative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for each type of periampullary cancers are shown in Tables 1 to 4. Overall perioperative morbidity and mortality for each cancer are similar. Overall perioperative mortality ranges from 0% to 15%. Overall perioperative morbidity also is similar among periampullary cancers and ranges from 30% to 50%. Postoperative diabetes after Whipple procedure is infrequent and does not occur more frequently with any of the periampullary cancers.1

.

Embryology

Can the embryology of the specific anatomic sites of the periampullary region explain the perceived differences in cancer behavior? The caudal foregut and the cranial midgut generate the duodenum. The origin of the bile duct, the pancreas, and the ampulla of Vater arise from the foregut just above its junction with the midgut. By the end of the fourth week, the dorsal pancreatic primordium arises from the dorsal duodenal diverticulum. Concurrently, the ventral duodenal diverticulum

Outcome Influences: Histology and Other Factors

Accurate histologic classification of periampullary cancers can be notoriously difficult. Not uncommonly, careful pathologic review of resected specimens alters the original clinical diagnosis. Two practical points are useful in defining the origin of these cancers, which can significantly improve diagnostic clinical accuracy: (1) the predominant site of the mass of the cancer and (2) the presence of any component of carcinoma in situ. Nevertheless, some periampullary cancers will evade an

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Clinical presentation often differs among patients with cancers primarily located in the distal portion of the biliary duct (biliary and ampullary), close to it (pancreatic), and those involving the ampullary complex, at least in early stages (duodenal). The main clinical difference is the timing of the onset of jaundice related to constitutional cancer symptoms. In patients in the former group, jaundice is always the most common symptom, and it usually precedes nausea, vomiting, or abdominal

Early vs Late Jaundice.

Intuitively, patients with cancers directly involving the distal bile duct should present with jaundice at an earlier stage of disease. Current data suggest that most ampullary, duodenal, and distal bile duct tumors present without lymph node metastases, and consequently when resected are associated with a better prognosis than pancreatic cancer. Although bile duct cancers should present early and should be associated with a prognosis equivalent to ampullary cancers, the fact that survival is

ALTERNATIVE SURGICAL TREATMENT

Currently, pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic or pylorus-preserving) remains the treatment of choice for invasive periampullary cancer; however, more limited resections of nonpancreatic periampullary cancers have been used selectively because of patient infirmity from comorbidity, early cancer stage (Tis), or both. Some patients with small (1 cm) ampullary or distal bile duct cancers are candidates for transduodenal ampullectomy, and selected patients with duodenal cancers not involving the

SUMMARY

Our review supports the clinical impression that periampullary cancers vary in outcome after resection. Overall survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy is greatest for patients with ampullary and duodenal cancers, intermediate for patients with bile duct cancer, and least for patients with pancreatic cancer. Moreover, survival for each tumor stage is greater for nonpancreatic periampullary cancers than for pancreatic cancers. Invasion of the pancreas by nonpancreatic periampullary cancers is a

References (71)

  • T.A. Sohn et al.

    Adenocarcinoma of the duodenum: Factors influencing long-term survival

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (1998)
  • H.B. Andersen et al.

    Pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma

    J Am Coll Surg

    (1994)
  • F.G. Bakaeen et al.

    What prognostic factors are important in duodenal adenocarcinoma?

    Arch Surg

    (2000)
  • H.G. Beger et al.

    Tumor of the ampulla of Vater

    Arch Surg

    (1999)
  • T.C. Bottger et al.

    Clinicopathologic study for the assessment of resection for ampullary carcinoma

    World J Surg

    (1997)
  • B. Chareton et al.

    Diagnosis and therapy of ampullary tumors

    World J Surg

    (1996)
  • A. Dorandeu et al.

    Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: Prognostic factors after curative surgery: A series of 45 cases

    Gut

    (1997)
  • M.P. Ebert et al.

    Analysis of K-ras gene mutations in rare pancreatic and ampullary tumors

    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (1998)
  • M. Farnell et al.

    Villous tumors of the duodenum: Reappraisal of local vs. extended resection

    Gastroenterology

    (1999)
  • L. Fernandez-Cruz et al.

    Locoregional dissemination and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer

    Dig Surg

    (1999)
  • Y. Fong et al.

    Outcome of treatment for distal bile duct cancer

    Br J Surg

    (1996)
  • J.G. Fortner et al.

    Tumor size is the primary prognosticator for pancreatic cancer after regional pancreatectomy

    Ann Surg

    (1996)
  • H. Friess

    Wang I, Zhu Z, et al: Growth factor receptors are differently expressed in cancers of the papilla of Vater and pancreas

    Ann Surg

    (1999)
  • F.P. Gall et al.

    Surgical treatment of ductal pancreatic carcinoma

    Eur J Surg Oncol

    (1991)
  • P. Ghanch et al.

    Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

    World J Surg

    (1999)
  • N. Harada et al.

    Pancreatic invasion is a prognostic indicator after radical resection for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater

    J Hepatobiliary-Pancreat Surg

    (1997)
  • M. Kayahara et al.

    Role of nodal involvement and the periductal soft tissue margin in middle and distal bile duct cancer

    Ann Surg

    (1999)
  • M. Kayahara et al.

    Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the distal bile duct based on clinicopathological study

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • J. Klempnauer et al.

    Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: Determinants of long-term survival in 94 resected patients

    HPB Surg

    (1998)
  • J.H.G. Klinkenbijl et al.

    Carcinoma of the pancreas and periampullary region: Palliation versus cure

    Br J Surg

    (1993)
  • R.A. Knox et al.

    Cancer of the ampulla of Vater

    Br J Surg

    (1986)
  • D.S. Longnecker et al.

    The case for parallel classification of biliary tract and pancreatic neoplasms

    Mod Pathol

    (1996)
  • J.R. Monson et al.

    Radical resection for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater

    Arch Surg

    (1991)
  • T. Nagakawa et al.

    Clinical study of lymphatic flow to the paraaortic lymph nodes in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas

    Cancer

    (1994)
  • T. Nagakawa et al.

    A clinical study on lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the pancreatic head area-peripancreatic regional lymph node grouping

    Hepatogastroenterology

    (1993)
  • Cited by (129)

    • Controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of periampullary tumours

      2022, Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, carcinomas located in the head of the pancreas may originate from the papilla of Vater, the distal part of the common bile duct, or the duodenum. Tumours of that region, within 2 cm of the major duodenal papilla, have been usually described as periampullary neoplasms [1]. Adenocarcinomas separated from the greater duodenal papilla (Vater) and located in the major pancreatic duct, common bile duct, or duodenum have been identified as ductal pancreatic carcinomas, distal bile duct carcinomas (cholangiocarcinomas) or duodenal carcinomas.

    • Comparison of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinomas: a propensity score matching analysis

      2021, American Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      There was also no significant differences being observed between the LPD and OPD groups in OS (P = 0.065) (Fig. 1b). PD is the only feasible and effective treatment for periampullary carcinoma.5 However, for different types of periampullary cancer, the survival rate after PD treatment is different.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Address reprint requests to David M. Nagorney, MD Mayo Clinic 200 First Street SW Rochester, MN 55905

    *

    Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

    View full text