The Tradeoffs of Social Control and Innovation in Groups and Organizations

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60308-1Get rights and content

Publisher Summary

This chapter presents the description of research on social influence that moves rather freely between laboratory settings and organizational contexts. The laboratory studies follow several well-developed research paradigms, with variations in conditions and resultant findings occurring in a cumulative fashion. The organizational studies of social influence have tended to draw on a wide variety of psychological and sociological theories, resulting in a more disparate set of findings that have rarely been drawn together. Whereas the social psychological work has typically been experimental, the organizational research ranges from quantitative experiments and surveys to more qualitative case studies. Thus, the integration of work on social control and innovation will necessitate mixing results with varying levels of internal and external validity. The chapter explains the discussion of social control and innovation that moves freely between the microscopic and the macroscopic. The chapter explores the way the studies of organizational behavior can profit from knowledge of more basic social influence processes and the way experimental group research can be enriched by an understanding of more complex organizational processes.

References (133)

  • V.L. Allen

    Situational factors in conformity

  • V.L. Allen et al.

    Consensus and conformity

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1969)
  • S. Moscovici et al.

    Social influence, conformity bias and the study of active minorities

  • H.E. Aldrich

    Organizations and environments

    (1979)
  • J.M. Amabile

    The social psychology of creativity

    (1983)
  • J.D. Aram et al.

    An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict

    Academy of Management Review

    (1987)
  • C. Argyris

    Reasoning, learning, and action: Individual and organization

    (1982)
  • S.E. Asch

    Effects of group pressures upon the modification and distortion of judgments

  • S.E. Asch

    Opinions and social pressure

    Scientific American

    (1955)
  • S.E. Asch

    Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority

    Psychological Monographs

    (1956)
  • M.H. Bazerman et al.

    Performance evaluation in a dynamic context: A laboratory study of the impact of a prior commitment to the ratee

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1982)
  • L. Berkowitz et al.

    Reactions to opinion deviates as affected by affiliation need (n) and group member interdependence

    Sociometry

    (1959)
  • R.R. Blake et al.

    The generality of conformity of behavior as a function of factual anchorage difficulty of task and amount of social pressure

    Journal of Personality

    (1957)
  • J. Brockner et al.

    Entrapment in escalating conflicts

    (1985)
  • T. Burns et al.

    The management of innovation

    (1961)
  • D. Byrne

    The attraction paradigm

    (1971)
  • D.T. Campbell

    Variation and selective retention in sociocultural evolution

    General Systems: Yearbook of the Society for General System Research

    (1969)
  • M. Crozier

    The bureaucratic phenomenon

    (1964)
  • R.S. Crutchfield

    Conformity and character

    American Psychologist

    (1955)
  • R.M. Cyert et al.

    A behavioral theory of the firm

    (1963)
  • E.L. Deci

    Intrinsic motivation

    (1975)
  • M. Deutsch et al.

    A study of normative and informational social influences on individual judgment

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1955)
  • W.M. Evan

    Organizational man and due process of law

    American Sociological Review

    (1961)
  • L. Festinger

    Informal social communication

    Psychological Review

    (1950)
  • F.V. Fox et al.

    The trapped administrator: Effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1979)
  • R.B. Freeman et al.

    What do unions do?

    (1984)
  • H.B. Gerard et al.

    Conformity and group size

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1968)
  • P.C. Giordano

    Sanctioning the high-status deviant: An attributional analysis

    Social Psychology Quarterly

    (1983)
  • J.W. Graham

    Organizational response to principled organizational dissent

    Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston.

    (1984)
  • J.W. Graham

    Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay

  • R.A. Griffin

    Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1983)
  • J.R. Hackman

    Group influences on individuals

  • M.T. Hannan et al.

    The population ecology of organizations

    American Journal of Sociology

    (1984)
  • T.T. Herbert et al.

    Improving executive decisions by formalizing dissent: The corporate devil's advocate

    Academy of Management Review

    (1977)
  • D.J. Hickson et al.

    A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational behavior

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1971)
  • F.S. Hills et al.

    University budgets and organizational decision making

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1978)
  • C.R. Hinings et al.

    Structural conditions of intraorganizational power

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1974)
  • A.O. Hirschman

    Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states

    (1970)
  • L.R. Hoffman et al.

    Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1961)
  • L.R. Hoffman et al.

    Sex differences, sex composition and group problem solving

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1961)
  • J.L. Holland

    Vocational preferences

  • E.P. Hollander

    Competence and conformity in the acceptance of influence

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1960)
  • E.P. Hollander et al.

    Some current issues in the psychology of conformity and nonconformity

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1967)
  • H.A. Homstein

    Managerial courage

    (1961)
  • R.C. Jacobs et al.

    The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1961)
  • I.L. Janis

    Groupthink

    Psychology Today

    (1971)
  • I.L. Janis

    Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes

    (1972)
  • H. Kalven et al.

    The American jury

    (1966)
  • R.M. Kanter

    Men and women of the corporation

    (1977)
  • R.M. Kanter

    When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization

  • Cited by (306)

    • The cost of freedom: Creative ideation boosts both feelings of autonomy and the fear of judgment

      2023, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, the expression of creative ideas may diminish judgments of leadership potential (Mueller, Goncalo, & Kamdar, 2011). This might be because creative ideas can upset the status quo (Nemeth, 1986; Nemeth & Staw, 1989) and the implementation of creative ideas could disrupt longstanding norms and routines (Gilbert & Bower, 2002). The experience of rejection is particularly aversive because the freedom to think divergently in the creative process makes ideas feel personally revealing (Goncalo & Katz, 2020) as individuals can freely choose which domain among many to focus on while expressing ideas (Paulus & Nijstad, 2003; Sawyer & DeZutter, 2009; Uzzi & Spiro, 2005).

    • Creativity and innovation: The role of team and organizational climate

      2023, Handbook of Organizational Creativity: Individual and Group Level Influences, Second Edition
    • Implicit impressions of creative people: Creativity evaluation in a stigmatized domain

      2022, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text