Chapter 2 Recent Advances in Solvent Suppression for Solution NMR: A Practical Reference

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0066-4103(08)00402-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Recent advances in solvent suppression for liquids based NMR spectroscopy are explored. An emphasis on techniques developed over the past 10 years is provided including recommendations on sample preparation and spectrometer optimization. In addition, biologically relevant samples were used to demonstrate and compare the relative strengths/weaknesses of described techniques. This publication attempts to provide practical background and general knowledge for both novice and experienced users seeking to select and optimize the most appropriate tools for their NMR challenges.

Section snippets

Objectives

There are a fantastic number of exploratory manuscripts and reviews thoroughly covering aspects of biomolecular NMR and the relationship with solvent suppression over the last 30 years. Biochemicallya focused NMR spectroscopy has been developing for well over a half century.1 Originally we had planned to cover all aspects of solvent suppression but were quickly forced to re-evaluate

Practicalities

The following sections attempt to quickly express some general NMR ‘rules of thumb’ that we have adopted. They are not meant to imply hard and fast rules or requirements to be imposed on all samples and spectroscopists (though some are certainly required at our facility), but instead simply methods we have found to effectively acquire consistent data in the most reasonable amount of time. As the saying goes, ‘Your mileage may vary’.

Suppression Pulse Sequences

The order of review was intended to be alphabetical with the exception of presaturation and water-eliminated Fourier transform (WEFT)/NOESY due to the importance of these sequences and comparisons to subsequent developments. Presaturation and WEFT (commonly referred to as 1D-NOESY) remain, for many groups, the ‘gold standard’ to which all other forms of suppression are compared. Suppression techniques prior to or during acquisition are considered. Suppression in the solid state67 and

Comparisons, Conclusions, and Advice

All the suppression techniques worked well in reducing solvent by many orders of magnitude. Solvent suppression has become so effective that improvements on the order of only a few percent can be the deciding factor when trying to determine the ‘best’ method during comparisons.

We selected two samples for the sequence comparisons. The first sample was a 1 mM ubiquitin protein dissolved in 90% H2O with 10% D2O with 1 mM DSS as an internal reference. The sample was deliberatively shortened to 550

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Kent Dixon for critical reading, Trent Bjorndahl (D. Wishart research group, Univ. of Alberta) for assistance and access to a cryogenically cooled probe on an 11.74T spectrometer to confirm the demagnetization field effects, John C. Lindon and David Neuhaus for correspondence over the years regarding solvent suppression developments, Frank Delaglio for discussions and patience on so many NMR techniques, George Gray for assistance with Varian's BioPack pulse sequences,

References (101)

  • P.J. Hore

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1989)
  • A. Coron et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2001)
  • M. Gueron et al.

    Progress in NMR Spectroscopy

    (1991)
  • M. Liu et al.
  • W.S. Price

    Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy

    (1999)
  • B.C. Potts et al.

    J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.

    (2001)
  • J.K. Nicholson et al.

    Progress in NMR Spectroscopy

    (1989)
  • B.M. Fung et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1976)
  • G. Arvidson et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1975)
  • S.R. Heller

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1968)
  • P.J. Hore

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1983)
  • A. Jerschow et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1999)
  • P.S. Wu et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2005)
  • G. Otting

    Progress in NMR Spectroscopy

    (1997)
  • X. Mao et al.

    Chemical Physics

    (1996)
  • C. Szantay

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1998)
  • H. Kovacs et al.

    Progress in NMR Spectroscopy

    (2005)
  • A.G. Webb

    Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy

    (2006)
  • B. Lix et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1996)
  • M. Augustine et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1996)
  • A. Jerschow

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1999)
  • L.E. Kay

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (1995)
  • D.J. Thomas et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1999)
  • R. Freeman

    Progress in NMR Spectroscopy

    (1998)
  • D. Canet et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1993)
  • C. Haasnoot

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1983)
  • G. Zheng et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2008)
  • A. Bax

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1985)
  • A.S. Altieri et al.

    J. Magn. Reson. B

    (1995)
  • R. Sarkar et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2008)
  • A.G. Palmer et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1991)
  • L. Emsley et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1990)
  • M. Mescher et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1996)
  • G.A. Morris et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1978)
  • K. Zangger et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2001)
  • E. Kupce et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1993)
  • L.E. Kay et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1989)
  • D.H. Zhou et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2008)
  • U.L. Gunther et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2002)
  • D. Marion et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1989)
  • I.D. Campbell et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1974)
  • D.I. Hoult

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1976)
  • A.G. Redfield et al.
  • X. Mao et al.

    Chemical Physics Letters

    (1994)
  • A. Kumar et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1980)
  • G. Bodenhausen et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1977)
  • T. Inubushi et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1983)
  • W.S. Price et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1997)
  • S.‐I. Tate et al.

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance

    (1992)
  • J.M. Wieruszeski et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Nuclear magnetic resonance in metabolomics

      2022, Metabolomics Perspectives: From Theory to Practical Application
    • NMR spectroscopy of wastewater: A review, case study, and future potential

      2021, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, by employing presaturation, PURGE still attenuates exchangeable protons. Variations of water suppression by gradient-tailored excitation (WATERGATE) [139], such as W5-WATERGATE, based on excitation sculpting techniques, arguably lead to the best water suppression (and baseline properties) to date, while retaining exchangeable protons [57,134]. However, there is considerable signal attenuation of resonances close to the water peak, as the sculpted region tends to be quite wide [57].

    • Jump-and-return sandwiches: A new family of binomial-like selective inversion sequences with improved performance

      2018, Journal of Magnetic Resonance
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, exchanging H2O with D2O is known to stabilize compact conformations of both globular [1] and tubular proteins [2,3] and protect them against aggregation. For these reasons, solvent signal suppression becomes necessary under many circumstances [e.g., 4–12]. WATERGATE [13,14] sequences provide robust solvent signal suppression in NMR experiments, achieved by application of a pulsed field gradient pair, where all coherences not affected by a selective inversion pulse are rephased, while affected coherences are dephased and removed.

    • Solvent suppression in DNP enhanced solid state NMR

      2017, Journal of Magnetic Resonance
      Citation Excerpt :

      The large solvent signal is a particular limitation for 1H detected DNP enhanced NMR spectroscopy, which would be highly desirable but which has so far not been widely exploited because of the interference of the solvent signals. Solvent suppression in NMR is usually quite straightforward [18], employing chemical shift selective methods for the narrow water resonance in solutions [19], or using differences in molecular dynamics to suppress solvent in solids at room temperature [20,21]. In contrast, under magic-angle-spinning (MAS) DNP conditions, it is less obvious how to suppress the (multiple) signals from the frozen solvent at 100 K.

    • Solvent Suppression Methods in NMR Spectroscopy

      2017, Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text