Source analysis of EEG oscillations using high-resolution EEG and MEG

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59003-XGet rights and content

Abstract

We investigated spatial properties of the source distributions that generate scalp electroencephalographic (EEG) oscillations. The inherent complexity of the spatio-temporal dynamics of EEG oscillations indicates that conceptual models that view source activity as consisting only of a few “equivalent dipoles” are inadequate. We present an approach that uses volume conduction models to characterize the distinct spatial filtering of cortical source activity by average reference EEG, high-resolution EEG, and magnetoencephalography (MEG). By comparing these three measures, we can make inferences about the sources of EEG oscillations without having to make prior assumptions about the sources. We apply this approach to spontaneous EEG oscillations observed with eyes closed at rest. Both EEG and MEG recordings show robust alpha rhythms over posterior regions of the cortex; however, the dominant frequency of these rhythms varies between EEG and MEG recordings. Frontal alpha and theta rhythms are generated almost exclusively by superficial radial dipole layers that generate robust EEG signals but very little MEG signals; these sources are presumably mainly in the gyral crowns of frontal cortex. MEG and high-resolution EEG estimates of alpha rhythms provide evidence of local tangential and radial sources in the posterior cortex, lying mainly on sulcal and gyral surfaces. Despite the detailed information about local radial and tangential sources potentially afforded by high-resolution EEG and MEG, it is also evident that the alpha and theta rhythms receive contributions from non-local source activity, for instance large dipole layers distributed over lobeal or (potentially) even larger spatial scales.

Section snippets

Spatial properties of EEG oscillations

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a very large-scale measure of brain source activity, apparently recording synaptic activity synchronized over macroscopic (centimeter), regional, and even whole brain spatial scales (Nunez, 2000; Nunez and Srinivasan, 2006). Synchrony among neural populations in compact regions of the brain produces localized dipole current sources. Synchrony among neural populations distributed across the cortex can give rise to regional or global networks consisting of many

Source models for EEG oscillations

The dipole approximation to cortical current sources provides the basis for any realistic EEG source model. It is based on the idea that at large distances, any complex current distribution in a small region of the cortex can be approximated by a “dipole” or more accurately, a dipole moment per unit volume. A “large distance” in this case is at least three or four times the distance between the effective poles of the dipole. Superficial gyral surfaces are located at roughly 1.5 cm from scalp

Spatial filtering of scalp potentials

The relationship between scalp potentials Φ(r,t)and the intermediate scale meso-source function P(r, t) or dipole moment per unit volume (μA/mm2) can be written in terms of a Green's function GE(r,r′) that describes the head volume coductor:Φ(r,t)=BGE(r,r)P(r,t)drThe Green's function expresses the relationship between a unit source at location r′ and the measurement point on the scalp surface r; it depends only on the properties of volume conduction in the head. The potential anywhere in

Source analysis by high-resolution EEG methods

High-resolution EEG methods are based on a conceptual framework that differs substantially from that of source localization. The current source distribution in the cranial volume cannot be estimated uniquely using only data recorded on the scalp surface. Assumptions must be applied by all source localization methods to arrive at source location estimates. By contrast, high-resolution EEG methods do not require any assumptions about the sources; instead they enhance the sensitivity of each

MEG

Magnetoencephalography is a relatively new technology that provides useful insights into sources when used as an adjunct to EEG measurements. One common but entirely erroneous idea is that MEG spatial resolution is superior to EEG spatial resolution, and that MEG should simply replace EEG to extract more accurate information about sources. A much more accurate view is that MEG and EEG are selectively sensitive to different sources; this can be either an advantage or disadvantage to MEG,

Simultaneous EEG and MEG recording

We describe here a preliminary study of spontaneous EEG sources; conventional average reference EEG, high-resolution EEG estimates (obtained with the New Orleans spline-Laplacian algorithm, Nunez and Srinivasan, 2006), and simultaneous MEG recordings are compared so as to obtain inferences about the underlying sources. The approach described here can be extended to event-related dynamics, evoked potentials, or any other scalp recorded EEG signals.

Spontaneous EEG exhibited by two of six subjects

Spectra of average reference EEG, high-resolution EEG, and MEG

Figure 4 shows RMS amplitude spectra at all electrodes or MEG sensors for one subject (SL) at rest with eyes closed. The upper plot shows the average reference EEG amplitude spectra; the middle plot shows the Laplacian spectra; and the lower plot shows the MEG amplitude spectra. Since these measures have units, we focused on frequencies with clear peaks in the spectrum of each channel. This subject shows a robust alpha rhythm with all three experimental measures.

In the average reference EEG

Spatial filtering implies temporal filtering

MEG, EEG, and Laplacian EEG each reflect cortical source dynamics that has been spatially filtered; the properties of the spatial filter are given by the appropriate Green's function. The simulations presented here and in Nunez and Srinivasan (2006) emphasize the critical point that each of these measures is preferentially sensitive to different kinds of source distributions. Scalp potentials emphasize distributed sources encompassing large regions of the cortex on lobeal or even larger scales.

A methodological framework for interpreting the sources of EEG oscillations

We have emphasized that interpreting the EEG or MEG in terms of the underlying source characteristics requires information about the selective sensitivity of different measures; such information is obtained by modeling volume conduction in the head. With sufficiently dense electrode arrays (64–128) we are able to make detailed estimates of superficial, localized sources using high-resolution EEG, in this case the surface Laplacian. However, the sensitivity of the surface Laplacian is

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the NIMH MH68004.

References (24)

  • R. Srinivasan

    Spatial structure of the human alpha rhythm: global correlation in adults and local correlation in children

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1999)
  • H.D. Jasper et al.

    Electrocorticograms in man. Effects of voluntary movement upon the electrical activity of the precentral gyrus

    Arch. Fur Psychiatrie und Zeitschrift Neurologie,

    (1949)
  • Cited by (90)

    • Tensor decomposition of human narrowband oscillatory brain activity in frequency, space and time

      2022, Biological Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      We denote these two sets as SNRlow and SNRhigh, respectively. After setting the activation at all dipoles, the forward model was applied and EEG time series at 64 electrodes arranged according to the 10-10 system (Seeck et al., 2017) were generated. This was done separately for every SNR setting.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text