EndovascularDemonstration of neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm with magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison with surgical findings in 60 consecutive cases
Section snippets
Magnetic resonance tomographic angiography
All patients underwent MRTA preoperatively using a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner (Philips Gyroscan ACS-NT Power Truk 1000 Advanced) to evaluate the neurovascular relationship as a routine examination. Scanning parameters were repetition time (TR) of 24 msec, echo time (TE) of 4.9 msec, and flip angle of 22°. This technique generates slices of 0.9-mm thickness and 0.45-mm slice gap (over contiguous slices). It displays vessels as hyperintense structures, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as hypointense, and
Offending vessels on MRTA
Excluding the cases of motion artifact, satisfactory images were obtained in all 60 cases and evaluated. In the cases of TN, neurovascular contact at the REZ was revealed in 15 (71%) of the 21 symptomatic cases. On MRTA, the single superior cerebellar artery (SCA) alone was responsible in 13 cases (Figure 1A). A duplicated SCA and anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) were seen to compress the trigeminal nerve in the other 2 cases. Vessels in contact with the nerves were not found on MRTA
Discussion
Recently, it has been accepted that the cause of TN or HFS is neurovascular compression at the REZ and surgical decompression results in good relief from the symptoms. Vascular compression was noted at operation in about 80 to 90% of cases 9, 16, 30. Until now, it has been difficult to determine neurovascular relationships preoperatively on CT, conventional MRI, or cerebral angiography. The fact that neurovascular compression is not recognized until the operation raises the question of whether
Conclusions
In TN and HFS cases, MRTA could reveal a neurovascular relationship and be useful for operative planning. Although operative indications should be based on clinical symptoms, vascular contact at the REZ on the symptomatic side provides support for operation. The combination of neurovascular compression and deformity of the affected nerve is a more convincing finding. There is a possibility that improper operative indications could be applied especially in cases of atypical symptoms, when
References (31)
Concerning the cause of trigeminal neuralgia
Am J Surg
(1934)Hemifacial spasm due to tumor, aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation
Surg Neurol
(1992)- et al.
Hemifacial spasmevaluation by magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance tomographic angiography
Ann Neurol
(1992) Long-term outcome after operation for trigeminal neuralgia in patients with posterior fossa tumors
J Neurosurg
(1996)Hemifacial spasm resulting from facial nerve compression near the internal acoustic meatus
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)
(1997)MRI of intracranial neurovascular compression
J Comput Assist Tomogr
(1992)Response of trigeminal neuralgia to “decompression” of sensory rootdiscussion of cause of trigeminal neuralgia
JAMA
(1959)Trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosislesion localization with magnetic resonance imaging
Neurology
(1997)Microvascular relations of the trigeminal nerve
J Neurosurg
(1980)Neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgiaa clinical and anatomical study
J Neurosurg
(1992)