Elsevier

Urology

Volume 52, Issue 4, October 1998, Pages 625-630
Urology

Adult Urology
Position-related changes in voiding dynamics in men

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00280-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate by urodynamic study position-related changes in uroflowmetry and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) in men because altered bladder function in the supine position may be a predisposing factor for urinary tract infections in the institutionalized elderly.

Methods. Two healthy men, 34 and 59 years of age and living at home, and 53 nursing home residents (mean age 71.8 years, range 46 to 92) were evaluated with uroflowmetry in the standing and recumbent positions (lying on the left or right side); corresponding PVRs were measured by transabdominal ultrasonic bladder scanning. The two healthy men were monitored longitudinally with multiple recordings in both voiding positions, and the nursing home residents were subjected to two observations: one measurement of the variable parameters in either position. Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05.

Results. The 34-year-old man performed 513 flows (368 standing and 145 recumbent). The mean of all the peak flow rates in the upright (28.2 ± 4.2 mL/s) versus the recumbent (16.8 ± 4.1 mL/s) position revealed a highly significant difference (P = 0.0001). Sixteen urinary flows and corresponding PVRs were completed by this subject in either voiding position. The difference between PVRs in the standing (13.1 ± 14.7 mL) versus recumbent (15.3 ± 17.5 mL) position was not statistically significant. The 59-year-old man completed 156 flows (128 standing and 28 recumbent). A highly significant difference was noted between the mean of all peak flows in the upright (18.9 ± 4.1 mL/s) versus recumbent (12.6 ± 2.0 mL/s) position (P = 0.0001). Thirty-seven urinary flows and corresponding PVRs were completed by this individual (10 PVRs were determined after voiding in the standing and 27 after voiding in the recumbent position). No significant difference was noted between PVRs in the standing (24.6 ± 34.4 mL) versus recumbent (16.5 ± 60.0 mL) position. In the nursing home residents, the difference between the mean peak flow rates in the standing (14.5 ± 8.6 mL/s) versus recumbent (12.4 ± 6.7 mL/s) position also reached statistical significance (P = 0.0084). The difference between PVRs in the standing (60.5 ± 125.6 mL) versus recumbent (84.8 ± 186.2 mL) position barely reached statistical significance (P = 0.0497).

Conclusions. The urinary flow rate decreases in the recumbent position. Bedridden residents may be predisposed to urinary tract infections because of alterations in voiding dynamics in the supine position. This area needs further study.

Section snippets

Material and methods

During May 1993, 54 men living at the Wisconsin Veterans Home in King were enrolled in the study. All residents were cooperative, gave written informed consent, and underwent uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) determination, and analysis of voiding symptoms. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Wisconsin Veterans Home. Residents unable to voluntarily void in the standing position were excluded. One subject (64 years old) was excluded because he performed

The 34-year-old man

This subject performed 513 flows (368 standing and 145 recumbent). The mean peak flow rates in the standing and recumbent positions were significantly different when stratifying for voided volume (Fig. 1) (P = 0.0001). For flows in the standing and reclining positions, the best fit line indicated an initial increase in peak flow with increasing voided volume (plots not presented). In the standing position, the maximum peak flow (30.9 mL/s) was estimated to occur at a voided volume of 253.7 mL;

Comment

Uroflowmetry is important in the evaluation of voiding dysfunction.10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Urinary flow reflects the dynamic interaction between detrusor contraction and bladder outlet resistance. However, uroflowmetry alone can not differentiate between bladder outlet obstruction and detrusor insufficiency.15 The detrusor contracts against a load that consists of the opening pressure of the urethra, the urethral resistance to flow, and the inertia of the fluid within the bladder. Several efforts

References (34)

  • G.W. Drach et al.

    Male peak urinary flow raterelationships to volume voided and age

    J Urol

    (1979)
  • G.W. Drach et al.

    A method of adjustment of male peak urinary flow rate for varying age and volume voided

    J Urol

    (1982)
  • J.G. Susset et al.

    Critical evaluation of uroflowmeters and analysis of normal curves

    J Urol

    (1973)
  • H. Lepor et al.

    Quantitative morphometry of the adult human bladder

    J Urol

    (1992)
  • D.M. Gleason et al.

    The pressure-flow studya method for measuring bladder neck resistance

    J Urol

    (1962)
  • R. Bruskewitz et al.

    The relevance of minimum urethral resistance in prostatism

    J Urol

    (1983)
  • T.T. Yoshikawa

    Unique aspects of urinary tract infection in the geriatric population

    Gerontology

    (1984)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text