Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 366, Issue 9490, 17–23 September 2005, Pages 1026-1035
The Lancet

Review
How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67028-6Get rights and content

Summary

In low and middle income countries, health workers are essential for the delivery of health interventions. However, inadequate health-worker performance is a very widespread problem. We present an overview of issues and evidence about the determinants of performance and strategies for improving it. Health-worker practices are complex behaviours that have many potential influences. Reviews of intervention studies in low and middle income countries suggest that the simple dissemination of written guidelines is often ineffective, that supervision and audit with feedback is generally effective, and that multifaceted interventions might be more effective than single interventions. Few interventions have been evaluated with rigorous cost-effectiveness trials, and such studies are urgently needed to guide policy. We propose an international collaborative research agenda to generate knowledge about the true determinants of performance and about the effectiveness of strategies to improve performance. Furthermore, we recommend that ministries of health and international organisations should actively help translate research findings into action to improve health-worker performance, and thereby improve health.

Introduction

The problem of inadequate health-worker performance in low and middle income countries is particularly urgent. Millions of children and adults die prematurely each year1, 2 even though many interventions exist that can prevent such deaths,3 and health workers (defined broadly to include public and private providers based in health facilities or communities) are essential for delivering these life-saving interventions. However performance (defined as adherence to an accepted standard or guideline) is very often inadequate, as documented in studies of child health, sexually transmitted diseases, family planning, obstetrics, mental disorders, injuries, and diabetes.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Governments and non-governmental organisations spend many resources on health workers and the systems that support them, and such investments could produce greater benefits to society than they currently do. Poor health-worker practices contribute to low use of health facilities by vulnerable populations, and improved performance might increase use of health services.19, 20, 21, 22 Additionally, health-worker practices can be harmful (eg, giving sedatives to children with pneumonia,16 or prescribing unnecessary antimicrobials23, 24, 25), and such errors of commission must be eliminated.

We aim to address the issue of achieving and maintaining high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings. We briefly outline the determinants of performance, discuss the effectiveness of strategies to improve performance, and describe knowledge gaps that, if filled, might lead to better interventions (or a better ability to select appropriate interventions) for achieving and maintaining high-quality performance. We acknowledge that the topic is vast, with many perspectives and actors. Because of limitations of space and, indeed, of the existing studies, this Review is an overview, based mainly on review articles of research undertaken in low and middle income countries and centred on public-sector workers in health facilities. In some cases, we refer to individual studies and research from industrialised countries.

Section snippets

Sources and quality of evidence

An essential first step towards improving performance is understanding the factors that influence it. Such factors fall into two categories: interventions (eg, training) and non-intervention determinants (eg, patient's age). Theoretically, the best source of evidence about the effect of interventions is a randomised-controlled trial; however these are rare in low and middle-income countries. Other study designs (eg, observational designs), although inherently more susceptible to some types of

Specific interventions

We examined two fundamental questions: which interventions are most effective (or cost effective); and, in what situations should a particular intervention be used? To answer the first question, we identified 11 literature reviews of studies about 15 strategies (table 2). Five were systematic reviews of studies from low and middle income countries,14, 25, 49, 52, 54 four were non-systematic reviews of studies from industrialised and low and middle income countries,45, 46, 47, 48 one was a

Knowledge gaps

We begin with the overarching goal that new knowledge should help achieve: a health system with high-quality performance that also can adapt rapidly to change while maintaining performance. We emphasise both aspects because standards change as new diseases and technologies emerge, and some existing technologies (especially antimicrobials) become less effective. For example, an evaluation of 17 clinical guidelines in the USA reported that the median time for a guideline to become outdated was

Recommendations

We make two recommendations. First, an international collaborative research agenda should be developed and financed to generate badly needed information about the cost and effectiveness of different strategies to improve performance, with special emphasis on which strategies are best adapted to different settings and health areas. Such an agenda might have three parts: (1) research on determinants of performance aimed at developing testable theories that explain health-worker practices; (2)

Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched MEDLINE from 1966 to March, 2004. Search terms were (“quality assurance, health care” or “diffusion of innovation” or “quality of health care” or “preventive health services” or “inservice training” or “intervention studies” or “randomized controlled trials” or “health services misuse” or “clinical competence” or “guideline adherence” or “evaluation studies” or “outcome assessment [health care]” or “delivery of health care” or “medical staff, hospital” or “peer review” or

References (78)

  • L Chen et al.

    Human resources for health: overcoming the crisis

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • R Grol et al.

    From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • S Ratanawijitrasin et al.

    Do national medicinal drug policies and essential drug programs improve drug use?: a review of experiences in developing countries

    Soc Sci Med

    (2001)
  • B Santoso

    Small group intervention vs formal seminar for improving appropriate drug use

    Soc Sci Med

    (1996)
  • J Chalker et al.

    Effectiveness of a multi-component intervention on dispensing practices at private pharmacies in Vietnam and Thailand: a randomized trial

    Soc Sci Med

    (2005)
  • DR Gwatkin et al.

    Making health systems more equitable

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • HV Hogerzeil et al.

    Field tests for rational drug use in twelve developing countries

    Lancet

    (1993)
  • CG Victora et al.

    Achieving universal coverage with health interventions

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • The World Health Report 2003: Shaping the future

    (2003)
  • M Abas et al.

    Common mental disorders and primary health care: current practice in low-income countries

    Harv Rev Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • SW Bickler et al.

    Surgical services for children in developing countries

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2002)
  • The World Development Report 2004: Making services work for poor people

    (2004)
  • R Bitera et al.

    [Quality of disease management of sexually transmitted diseases: investigation of care in six countries in West Africa]

    Sante

    (2002)
  • R Brugha et al.

    Improving the quality of private sector delivery of public health services: challenges and strategies

    Health Policy Plan

    (1998)
  • A Mills et al.

    What can be done about the private health sector in low-income countries?

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2002)
  • J Naimoli

    Theoretical and empirical advances in research on the implementation of an integrated approach to managing childhood illness in outpatient facilities in developing countries

    (2001)
  • Ross-Degnan D, Laing R, Santoso B, Ofori-Adjei, D, Lamoureux C, Hogerzeil H, Improving pharmaceutical use in primary...
  • AK Rowe et al.

    Predictors of correct treatment of children with fever seen at outpatient health facilities in the Central African Republic

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2000)
  • AK Rowe et al.

    Management of childhood illness at health facilities in Benin: problems and their causes

    Am J Public Health

    (2001)
  • AK Rowe et al.

    Risk and protective factors for two types of error in the treatment of children with fever at outpatient health facilities in Benin

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2003)
  • DR Whiting et al.

    Diabetes in Africa. Challenges to health care for diabetes in Africa

    J Cardiovasc Risk

    (2003)
  • CF Lanata et al.

    Mejorando la calidad de la atención de salud en el Perú

    (2002)
  • Improving quality of paediatric care in small hospitals in developing countries

  • F Tanser et al.

    New approaches to spatially analyse primary health care usage patterns in rural South Africa

    Trop Med Int Health

    (2001)
  • E Gouws et al.

    Improving antimicrobial use among health workers in first-level facilities: results from the Multi-Country Evaluation of the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness strategy

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2004)
  • Interventions and strategies to improve the use of antimicrobials in developing countries

    (2001)
  • N Black

    Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care

    BMJ

    (1996)
  • CG Victora et al.

    Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials

    Am J Public Health

    (2004)
  • SM Shortell et al.

    Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress

    Milbank Q

    (1998)
  • Cited by (764)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text