Viewpoint

Success factors and ethical challenges of the Spanish Model of organ donation

Transplant rates in Ontario rose steeply in the decade prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reasons for that increase remain unclear, but the inter-organizational arrangement of organ donation programs may have contributed. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating these inter-organizational arrangements, with a limited understanding of how communication facilitates organ donation. Understanding these arrangements may help to re-establish rising organ donation rates post-pandemic.

To describe interprofessional interactions of Organ and Tissue Donation Coordinators (OTDCs) during organ donation cases, within organ donation programs in Ontario, from an organizational perspective (describing structure, context, process).

Mixed-method social network analysis (SNA) approach analyzing 14 organ donation cases just before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Structure: Social network graphs depict the joint work performed by hospital staff and OTDCs, with a great part of the communication being processed through the OTDC. Context: Network density ranged from 0.05 to 0.24 across cases, and health care professionals perceived an atmosphere of shared vision and trust among team members. Process: Most networks had a degree centralization <0.50 suggesting a decentralized information flow, and participants perceived decisions being jointly made. The characteristic path length of cases ranged from 1.6 to 3.2, suggesting potential for rapid information diffusion. Overall, data reinforced the OTDC role of intermediator within the communication process, and hospital staff perceived OTDCs as central players. Hospital staff and OTDCs reported frustration with some aspects of the flow of information during the organ allocation processes.

Findings from this study provide a network map of communications within organ donation cases and reinforce the importance of the OTDC role. Opportunities for quality improvement within these processes are identified.

This systematic review synthesizes qualitative evidence on the experiences of donor families after consent to organ donation.

This robust, qualitative systematic review included an exhaustive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO PsycINFO, and CINAHL Complete. Manual searches of reference lists and gray literature were conducted to achieve a comprehensive identification of all relevant research. A qualitative study design served to capture the experiences of donor families after organ donation consent.

A total of 6 articles that met the eligibility criteria were identified and included in this review. Three key themes emerged from the primary research: 1. family members were ambivalent about consent due to the ambiguity of brain death; 2. conversations about donation requirements proved uncomfortable; and 3. support is needed after donation.

Family members demonstrated ongoing ambivalence and distress that lasted for weeks after organ donation due to the ambiguity of brain death. Some family members were unhappy with having been approached for a conversation about organ donation. Donor families were not always able to deal with the difficulties they faced after their decision about organ donation. Health care professionals should provide ongoing care and updated information to family members. This review helped to identify family members’ needs for both psychological and financial assistance.

Families play a prominent role in the eventual organ donation decision. Because the deceased cannot directly express their wishes, their families become the actual decision makers. In China, families are permitted to make decisions regarding organ donation that may not be in accordance with the wishes of the deceased family member, and objections by families are a main bottleneck in the donation process.

Face-to-face questioning was conducted with organ procurement organization coordinators. At the same time, questionnaires were distributed in 11 cities in Zhejiang Province.

Of the respondents, 69.9% considered family consent necessary and 77.1% thought that the view of their family had a great, even decisive, influence on them to decide to become donors. If the deceased family member had registered as an organ donor, 65.2% of families decided that they would respect the wishes of the deceased person. Adult children (58.6%) were more likely to donate than parents (37.4%; χ² = 123.009, P < .001). Those born after 2000 and after 1990 (62.5% and 52.8%, respectively) were much more likely to donate than those born after 1960 (18.1%; χ² = 191.485, P < .001). The interviews indicated that there were high rates of donation refusals within potential donation families. Most donor families chose to make hidden donations, and the majority of donor families had a simple family structure.

To promote organ donation, China needs to reconsider the role of families in the decision-making process. It is essential to increase organ donation awareness within the younger generation and encourage them to discuss with their families their willingness to donate.

The provision of oocytes plays an important role in human fertility treatments. Spain alone performs half of oocyte provision cycles in the European Union whilst all other European countries face an oocyte shortage. How do Spanish fertility clinics manage to match the increasing domestic and foreign demand for female oocytes? Adopting a weak performativity approach and drawing insights from interviews carried out with 20 fertility clinic representatives, this study suggests that Spanish clinics are successful thanks to an egg provision system designed as a (quasi) social market. In the absence of traditional market mechanisms based on price fluctuations, the combination of fixed monetary compensation for providers and altruistic framing of oocyte provision as an act of donation, are used to mobilize relatively high numbers of women. Fertility clinics optimize this supply through a set of supplementary strategies to ensure oocyte supply always meets oocyte demand. Though successful, this market design reinforces gender stereotypes and relies on manipulative notions of altruism. A clear but unacknowledged appropriation of women's bodies and reproductive labour are also operated, which reinforces and reproduces racial and social stratifications. Therefore, we ask whether alternative mechanisms to promote female solidarity across different generations, to raise awareness of the risks of advanced maternal age, and to explore alternative market designs should be considered.

Organ transplantation is the treatment of choice for most end-stage diseases, despite the continuous advancements in the medical and surgical field. The dilemma of the shortage between supply and demand of organs for transplantation has been an ongoing debate and concern. The well-known “Spanish Model” was established in 1989 and adopted by the National Transplant Organization. The main commitment of the National Transplant Organization is to increase organ donation and transplantation rates. The program was also successfully adopted in countries such as Australia and Great Britain as well as Latin-American countries. The system is based on recruitment of cadaveric organs by a specialized team in hospitals at the regional and national level. Lebanon hopes to initialize a model similar to the Spanish Model but faces several obstacles. Adopting such a model could help increase cadaveric organ donation in Lebanon.