The Dying PatientPROGNOSTIC UNCERTAINTY IN TERMINAL CARE: CAN THE KARNOFSKY INDEX HELP?
References (15)
- et al.
National hospice analysis plan
J Chron Dis
(1983) - et al.
The St Thomas' Hospital terminal care support team
Lancet
(1981) - et al.
Whither hospice evaluation?
J Chron Dis
(1983) The terminal period of cancer: definition and descriptive epidemiology
J Chron Dis
(1984)- et al.
Scientific problems in clinical scales, as demonstrated in the Karnofsky index of performance status
J Chron Dis
(1979) - et al.
Terminal care: personal services and future priorities
Br Med J
(1981)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (190)
Introduction to prognostication
2023, Palliative Radiation OncologyPalliative radiotherapy in bones
2023, Palliative Radiation OncologyMultidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process
2022, Clinical and Translational Radiation OncologyCitation Excerpt :Performance status has been shown in both retrospective and prospective studies to correlate with survival for patients with advanced cancer [20–24]. In one study, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) alone was shown to have a stronger correlation with survival than clinical predictions made by oncologists [25], though this result has not been consistent [26]. The performance status scale proposed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) has also been consistently shown to correlate with survival [27].
Prognostication in neurology
2022, Handbook of Clinical NeurologyInflammatory Markers and Radiotherapy Response in Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
2022, Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementClinical Predictors for Analgesic Response to Radiotherapy in Patients with Painful Bone Metastases
2021, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Copyright © 1985 Published by Elsevier Ltd.