Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 325, Issue 8439, 25 May 1985, Pages 1204-1206
The Lancet

The Dying Patient
PROGNOSTIC UNCERTAINTY IN TERMINAL CARE: CAN THE KARNOFSKY INDEX HELP?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92876-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Members of a terminal care support team in a London health district recorded upper and lower estimates of prognosis on 42 patients during 149 visits. Just over half of the actual survivals were within the estimate limits, and the estimates tended to be overoptimistic. For the initial observations on each patient, a health status measure, the Karnofsky index, gave a closer correlation with the actual survival than the estimates. Better predictors of prognosis are needed by staff caring for terminally ill people.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (190)

  • Introduction to prognostication

    2023, Palliative Radiation Oncology
  • Palliative radiotherapy in bones

    2023, Palliative Radiation Oncology
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process

    2022, Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Performance status has been shown in both retrospective and prospective studies to correlate with survival for patients with advanced cancer [20–24]. In one study, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) alone was shown to have a stronger correlation with survival than clinical predictions made by oncologists [25], though this result has not been consistent [26]. The performance status scale proposed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) has also been consistently shown to correlate with survival [27].

  • Prognostication in neurology

    2022, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text