Elsevier

Clinical Therapeutics

Volume 22, Issue 9, September 2000, Pages 1112-1120
Clinical Therapeutics

The discriminative ability of the 12-Item short form health survey (SF-12) in a sample of persons infected with HIV

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80088-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assesses constructs that transcend laboratory-based clinical parameters. Corroboration of the hypothesized relationships between the 2 types of health indicators (ie, clinical and HRQOL) could provide evidence of the validity of an HRQOL measurement tool.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of scores on the mental component summary (MCS-12) and physical component summary (PCS-12) of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) to discriminate between HIV-infected persons in predefined disease-severity groups based on surrogate markers.

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved the collection of clinical data (ie, CD4 cell count, viral load [HIV-1 RNA copies/mL]) from patients' medical records and HRQOL data from the SF-12 at 2 HIV specialty clinics. The ability of SF-12 summary scores to discriminate between patients stratified by disease severity (ie, CD4 cell count <200 vs ≥200/mm3; HIV-1 RNA >55,000 vs ≤55,000 copies/mL) was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

Data were collected from 478 patients. The scores from the PCS-12 were able to discriminate between groups of patients stratified by disease severity based on CD4 cell count (P < 0.001) and HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (P < 0.01). MCS-12 scores did not discriminate between disease-severity groups.

Conclusions

Although the SF-12 is a brief generic measure of HRQOL, these findings provide further evidence of the validity of the SF-12 and suggest that it may be a practical way to monitor health status from the perspective of the HIV-infected patient.

References (26)

  • GallantJE

    Strategies for long-term success in the treatment of HIV infection

    JAMA

    (1900)
  • WuAW et al.

    A health status questionnaire using 30 items from the Medical Outcomes Study. Preliminary validation in persons with early HIV infection

    Med Care

    (1991)
  • ClearyPD et al.

    Health-related quality of life in persons with acquired immune deficiency syndrome

    Med Care

    (1993)
  • FranchiD et al.

    Measuring healthrelated quality of life among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus

    Clin Infect Dis

    (1998)
  • CarpenterCC et al.

    Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1998: Updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • StewartAL et al.

    Preface

  • WachtelT et al.

    Quality of life in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection: Measurement by the Medical Outcomes Study instrument

    Ann Intern Med

    (1992)
  • WuAW et al.

    Applications of the Medical Outcomes Study healthrelated quality of life measures in HIV/ AIDS

    Qual Life Res

    (1997)
  • WareJE et al.

    A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity

    Med Care

    (1996)
  • WareJE et al.

    SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales

    (1995)
  • Essink-BotM-L et al.

    An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA Charts, and the EuroQol instrument

    Med Care

    (1997)
  • LeidyNK et al.

    Recommendations for evaluating the validity of quality of life claims for labeling and promotion

    Value Health

    (1999)
  • HaysRD et al.

    Assessing the reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials

  • Cited by (59)

    • Relationship between functional capacity and health-related quality of life of patients with type—2 diabetes

      2017, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 questionnaire (SF-12). As a generic instrument, the SF-12 has been shown to be valid in both apparently healthy individuals and chronic diseases [17]. The SF-12 is a 12-item version of the Medical outcomes study Short Form-36 (SF-36) addressing physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional health, social functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, and mental health [18].

    • Improvements in health-related quality of life among methadone maintenance clients in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

      2016, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The SF-12 has been extensively validated, is well-accepted by patients, and performs well across diverse population groups. In particular, SF-12 has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity in the general population (Ware et al., 1996); among individuals with severe mental illness and substance dependence (Salyers, Bosworth, Swanson, Lamb-Pagone, & Osher, 2000); and among people living with HIV (Chariyalertsak et al., 2011; Delate & Coons, 2000; Han, Pulling, Telke, & Huppler Hullsiek, 2002; Viswanathan, Anderson, & Thomas, 2005; Wu, Hays, Kelly, Malitz, & Bozzette, 1997). The use of the SF-36, from which the SF-12 is based, has also demonstrated validity in Tanzania (Magafu et al., 2009; Wagner et al., 1999; Wyss et al., 1999).

    • A reduced factor structure for the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire provided reliable indicators of health-related quality of life

      2016, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Eight subscale scores are computed as the sum of item responses, rescaled on a 0- to 100-point scale, with higher values reflecting better life quality. The 12-item SF v2 survey is derived from the SF-36 and has demonstrated its reliability and validity as a generic measure of health functioning in clinical and nonclinical samples [10], including HIV-positive patients [11]. It provides two summary composites scores: a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS) score, which are standardized on a T-scale [with mean 50 and standard deviation (SD) 10 points].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text