Elsevier

Clinical Therapeutics

Volume 22, Issue 11, November 2000, Pages 1294-1305
Clinical Therapeutics

Effect of zanamivir on duration and resolution of influenza symptoms

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(00)83026-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Background: Zanamivir is a neuraminidase inhibitor, the first of a new class of drugs with potent, specific antiviral activity against influenza A and B. Administration by inhalation results in direct delivery to the respiratory tract, the principal site of viral replication.

Objective: This study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of zanamivir on duration and resolution of influenza symptoms.

Methods: Using a method similar to that employed in amantadine treatment studies to obtain supporting evidence of efficacy for US Food and Drug Administration consideration, pooled data from 6 zanamivir phase II and III clinical trials involving primarily previously healthy adults were analyzed to categorize patients as accelerated resolvers (temperature <37.8°C ≤24 hours after dosing, plus a ≥50% reduction in symptom score by 36 hours), early resolvers (temperature <37.8°C ≤36 hours after dosing), and nonaccelerated resolvers (febrile >36 hours after dosing). Patients in the accelerated and early categories were termed rapid resolvers; the others were slow resolvers. Patients recorded their symptom severity, temperature, ability to perform normal daily activities, and use of relief medication on a diary card. The primary end point of median time to alleviation of symptoms was also reexamined, with the additional requirement that patients were not taking relief medication when their symptoms were alleviated. This analysis was intended to control for the possible effect of relief medication on the primary end point.

Results: In the influenza-positive population (n = 1572), significantly more zanamivir-treated patients were rapid resolvers compared with those receiving placebo (807 [72%] vs 765 [64%], P < 0.001). Significant benefits of zanamivir treatment were observed in patients with a baseline temperature of ≥37.8°C (630 [68%] vs 595 [57%], P < 0.001) or ≥38.3°C (382 [67%] vs 365 [52%], P < 0.001) and in patients considered by their physician to have severe symptoms at the start of therapy (252 [70%] vs 222 [63%], P = 0.02). Differences were even more apparent in patients with high-risk conditions (74% vs 53%, P = 0.014) and in those aged ≥50 years (70% vs 54%, P = 0.005). Zanamivir treatment was also associated with a significant reduction in time to alleviation of symptoms with no use of relief medication. This was particularly noticeable in those aged ≥50 years; time to alleviation was 13 days in patients receiving placebo and 6 days in patients receiving zanamivir (P < 0.001). In these trials, adverse events were reported at a similar frequency in patients receiving zanamivir and those receiving placebo.

Conclusions: Zanamivir is more effective than placebo in patients with influenza at providing early symptom relief and a reduced duration of illness at a time when use of relief medication has ended. These benefits are seen across different patient groups but appear to be particularly marked in patients who are aged ≥50 years, who have underlying illnesses, who are considered high risk, or who are more severely ill at the beginning of therapy.

References (18)

  • AS Monto

    Influenza: Quantifying morbidity and mortality

    Am J Med.

    (1987)
  • MJ Makela et al.

    Clinical efficacy and safety of the orally inhaled neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir in the treatment of influenza: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled European study

    J. Infect.

    (2000)
  • PA Patriarca et al.

    Efficacy of influenza vaccine in nursing homes: Reduction in illnesses and complications during an influenza A (H3N2) epidemic

    JAMA

    (1985)
  • Prevention and control of influenza: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

    MMWR

    (2000)
  • AS Monto et al.

    Implication of viral resistance to amantadine in control of influenza A

    Clin Infect Dis.

    (1992)
  • FG Hayden et al.

    Emergence and apparent transmission of rimantadine-resistant influenza A virus in families

    N Engl J Med.

    (1989)
  • M Tisdale

    Monitoring of viral susceptibility: New challenges with the development of influenza NA inhibitors

    Rev Med Virol.

    (2000)
  • PM Colman

    A novel approach to antiviral therapy for influenza

    J Antimicrob Chemother.

    (1999)
  • JM Barnett et al.

    Zanamivir susceptibility monitoring and characterization of influenza virus clinical isolates obtained during phase II clinical efficacy studies

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother.

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (32)

  • Influenza Viruses

    2018, Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
  • Antigen-specific H1N1 influenza antibody responses in acute respiratory tract infections and their relation to influenza infection and disease course

    2014, Journal of Clinical Virology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A score for severity of symptoms (SOS) was calculated for each patient as they presented to the ED. The previously validated instrument asked patients to rate, on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), the severity of seven symptoms: cough, nasal obstruction, sore throat, fatigue, headache, myalgia, and feverishness [20,21]. During January through March of 2009, we used the rapid point-of-care Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) to screen patients presenting to the ED who were suspected of having an acute infection with influenza.

  • C-reactive protein as predictor of bacterial infection among patients with an influenza-like illness

    2013, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In order to compare the baseline characteristics of the group, a severity of symptom score was calculated for each patient as the presented to the ED. This previously validated severity of symptom (SOS) score was calculated by asking participants to record the severity of 7 symptoms: cough, nasal obstruction, sore throat, fatigue, headache, myalgia, and feverishness [15,16]. The patients rated the severity of each symptom on a scale from 0 being none to 3 being severe.

  • Influenza Viruses

    2012, Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Fourth Edition
  • Computational analysis and modeling the effectiveness of 'Zanamivir' targeting neuraminidase protein in pandemic H1N1 strains

    2011, Infection, Genetics and Evolution
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is found to be effective against wide range of influenza A and B viruses both in vitro and in laboratory animals by preventing release of progeny virions budding out from cell surface (Ferraris et al., 2005; Colman, 1999; Barnett et al., 2000). Administration by inhalation results in direct delivery to the respiratory tract, the principal site of viral replication (Monto et al., 2000). Mutation in a nearby residue of the drug binding site plays a vital role in the binding affinity of the drug with the corresponding protein.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text