Efficacy of spinal manipulation for chronic headache: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-4754(01)99423-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Chronic headache is a prevalent condition with substantial socioeconomic impact. Complementary or alternative therapies are increasingly being used by patients to treat headache pain, and spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is among the most common of these.

Objective: To assess the efficacy/effectiveness of SMT for chronic headache through a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials on chronic headache (tension, migraine and cervicogenic) were included in the review if they compared SMT with other interventions or placebo. The trials had to have at least 1 patient-rated outcome measure such as pain severity, frequency, duration, improvement, use of analgesics, disability, or quality of life. Studies were identified through a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (1966–1998) and EMBASE (1974–1998). Additionally, all available data from the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Chiropractic Research Archives Collection, and the Manual, Alternative, and Natural Therapies Information System were used, as well as material gathered through the citation tracking, and hand searching of non-indexed chiropractic, osteopathic, and manual medicine journals.

Data Extraction: Information about outcome measures, interventions and effect sizes was used to evaluate treatment efficacy. Levels of evidence were determined by a classification system incorporating study validity and statistical significance of study results. Two authors independently extracted data and performed methodological scoring of selected trials.

Data Synthesis: Nine trials involving 683 patients with chronic headache were included. The methodological quality (validity) scores ranged from 21 to 87 (100-point scale). The trials were too heterogeneous in terms of patient clinical characteristic, control groups, and outcome measures to warrant statistical pooling. Based on predefined criteria, there is moderate evidence that SMT has short-term efficacy similar to amitriptyline in the prophylactic treatment of chronic tension-type headache and migraine. SMT does not appear to improve outcomes when added to soft-tissue massage for episodic tension-type headache. There is moderate evidence that SMT is more efficacious than massage for cervicogenic headache. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results and the overall study conclusions remained the same even when substantial changes in the prespecified assumptions/rules regarding the evidence determination were applied.

Conclusions: SMT appears to have a better effect than massage for cervicogenic headache. It also appears that SMT has an effect comparable to commonly used first-line prophylactic prescription medications for tension-type headache and migraine headache. This conclusion rests upon a few trials of adequate methodological quality. Before any firm conclusions can be drawn, further testing should be done in rigorously designed, executed, and analyzed trials with follow-up periods of sufficient length.

References (71)

  • D Moher et al.

    Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews

    Lancet

    (1996)
  • G Gregoire et al.

    Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias?

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1995)
  • D Moher et al.

    Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists

    Controlled Clin Trials

    (1995)
  • R Jaeschke et al.

    Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference

    Controlled Clin Trials

    (1989)
  • EF Juniper

    Quality of life questionnaires: does statistically significant = clinically important?

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (1998)
  • AD Oxman et al.

    Agreement among reviewers of review articles

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1991)
  • AP Verhagen et al.

    Balneotherapy and quality assessment: interobserver reliability of the Maastricht criteria list and the need for blinded quality assessment

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1998)
  • BK Rasmussen

    Epidemiology of headache

    Cephalalgia

    (1995)
  • BS Schwartz et al.

    Epidemiology of tension-type headache

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • WF Stewart et al.

    Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors

    JAMA

    (1992)
  • Business and Health Special Report: Controlling headache costs

    (1992)
  • DM Eisenberg et al.

    Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • S Haldeman et al.

    Spinal manipulative therapy in the management of low back pain

  • EL Hurwitz et al.

    Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of literature

    Spine

    (1996)
  • RE Slavin

    Best-evidence synthesis: an alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews

    Educ Res

    (1986)
  • WO Spitzer et al.

    Links between passive smoking and disease: a best-evidence synthesis. A report of the Working Group on Passive Smoking

    Clin Invest Med

    (1990)
  • Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians

    Spine

    (1987)
  • GV Glass et al.
  • J Cohen
  • H Friedman

    Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its estimation

    Psychol Bull

    (1968)
  • LV Hedges et al.
  • BW Koes et al.

    Spinal manipulation and mobilization for back and neck pain: a blinded review

    BMJ

    (1991)
  • WJ Assendelft et al.

    The effectiveness of chiropractic for treatment of low back pain: an update and attempt at statistical pooling

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther

    (1996)
  • S Bigos et al.

    Acute low back problems in adults

  • DE Stude et al.

    A holistic approach to severe headache symptoms in a patient unresponsive to regional manual therapy

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther

    (1996)
  • Cited by (168)

    • Analysis of the upper cervical spine stiffness during axial rotation: A comparative study among patients with tension-type headache or migraine and asymptomatic subjects

      2017, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In these cases, physical management is generally prescribed in order to optimize the primary medical treatment (i.e. anti-inflammatory drug or painkiller). Moreover, many studies emphasized the beneficial impact of manual approaches in the treatment of these pathologies (Ajimsha, 2011; Bronfort et al., 2001; Espi-Lopez et al., 2014). Currently, only primary cervicogenic headache is related with the biomechanics of the cervical spine.

    • Cervical Headache

      2017, Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Secrets: Third Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was funded by the Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, Northwestern Health Sciences University, Bloomington, Minn.

    2

    Gert Bronfort, DC, PhD, holds the Greenawalt Research Chair, funded through an unrestricted grant from Foot Levelers, Inc.

    View full text