Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 104, Issue 12, December 1997, Pages 2085-2093
Ophthalmology

Mitomycin C Treatment for Conjunctival—Corneal Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Multicenter Experience

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30055-4Get rights and content

Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and risks of topical mitomycin C (MMC) for conjunctival-corneal intraepithelial neoplasia (CCIN).

Design: The study design was a clinical case series of CCIN.

Participants: Seventeen patients, 16 with biopsy-confirmed CCIN and 1 with invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), were included in the study.

Intervention: Patients received topical drops of MMC 0.02% to 0.04% four times daily from 7 to 28 days. Retreatment was done in cases of lesion recurrence.

Main Outcome Measures: The size of the CCIN before and after the treatment and ocular complications post-MMC application were evaluated.

Results: Ten patients remained disease-free after one course of MMC application. In one case, residual CCIN remained very small without regrowth. In the one patient with invasive SCC and in five patients with CCIN, regrowth occurred within 6 months of the first treatment. After retreatment, invasive SCC and CCIN in an additional two patients were eradicated. In two cases, although the size of the lesions decreased after two and three applications of MMC, regrowth occurred, and the CCIN returned to its original size. In the final case, limited recurrence has occurred and no retreatment has been done. The complications of MMC use included mild-to-moderate conjunctival hyperemia and mild allergy, which resolved after discontinuation of the treatment. Severe pain manifested when treatment was longer than 14 days.

Conclusions: Application of topical MMC is an efficient treatment for most but not all cases of CCIN.

Cited by (169)

  • Personalized treatment concepts in extraocular cancer

    2024, Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research
  • Effects of corneal epithelial superficial keratectomy in patients with focal limbal stem cell disease

    2022, American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    These severe cases are a contra-indication for our technique. According to the principle of starting with the least invasive treatment, topical eye drops such as mitomycin C25 should have been performed first, but we did not try mitomycin C prior to keratectomy because there was a report that its use can, in fact, induce LSC disorder.26 A further limitation is that long-term survival has not been assured, as the longest follow-up period was 3 years (Case 2).

  • Canalicular Stenosis Secondary to Chemotherapeutic Agents

    2021, Advances in Ophthalmology and Optometry
    Citation Excerpt :

    MMC is a chemotherapeutic antibiotic that cross-links DNA base pairs adenine and guanine, inhibiting the synthesis of DNA. It has been used to treat several ocular conditions, including conjunctival corneal intraepithelial neoplasia [17], primary acquired melanoma [18], as well as glaucoma [19] and pterygium surgeries [3]. Punctal-canalicular stenosis secondary to MMC was first described in 2003 in a case report of a 62-year-old woman who was treated with MMC for corneal epithelial dysplasia [20].

  • Ocular surface complications of local anticancer drugs for treatment of ocular tumors

    2021, Ocular Surface
    Citation Excerpt :

    Superficial keratitis is often observed in eyes treated with local anticancer drugs, and can be attributed to increased inflammatory response induced by drugs, such as IFN-α and imiquimod, that act by boosting the immune system [58,61,70,71,123–125]. Contact dermatitis and allergic lid reaction including edema, blepharitis, ectropion, erythema, eyelid inflammation and blepharospasm have been reported in eyes administered topical MMC (10–34%) [16,20,21,24,26,27] and topical 5-FU (5–49.2%) [34,37–40,43,44]. Punctal and canalicular obstruction leading to epiphora are well-known complications associated with many systemic chemotherapies.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented as a paper at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, Chicago, October 1996.

The authors have no proprietary interest in the development or marketing of this or a competing drug.

View full text