The cellular basis of the efficacy of the trinuclear platinum complex BBR 3464 against cisplatin-resistant cells
Introduction
BBR 3464 is a novel trinuclear platinum compound (Fig. 1) which, by virtue of its molecular structure, was expected to produce DNA lesions different from those produced by conventional mononuclear platinum compounds including cisplatin. The central Pt unit does not contribute to covalent DNA binding, but gives a charge and hydrogen-bonding capacity which increases the affinity for DNA [1]. Based on its structural features and multifunctional nature (4+ charges, reactive Pt centres) this drug should be regarded as the representative of a new class of DNA damaging agents.
In a preclinical study we have reported that BBR 3464 is extremely effective in inhibiting the growth of tumour xenografts poorly responsive to cisplatin [2]. However, the cellular basis of BBR 3464 efficacy was not completely elucidated. Therefore, we performed a comparative study of BBR 3464 and cisplatin in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant cells to define the molecular determinants of response to BBR 3464 and the cellular basis of lack of cross-resistance. For this purpose, we used a human osteosarcoma cell line (U2-OS) and an in vitro selected cisplatin-resistant subline (U2-OS/Pt).
Section snippets
Cell lines and growth conditions
The cisplatin-resistant osteosarcoma cell line U2-0S/Pt was generated by continuous exposure of the U2-OS cell line (ATCC, HTB 96) to increasing concentrations of cisplatin up to 1 μg/ml. Both cell lines were grown in McCoy’s 5A containing 10% fetal calf serum. The hMLH1-deficient human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line HCT116 and sublines complemented with chromosome 3 (HCT116/chr3) and chromosome 2 (HCT116/chr2) were kindly provided by Dr R. Boland (San Diego, CA). Cell lines were
Results and discussion
The cellular effects of BBR 3464 were studied in a human osteosarcoma cellular model including cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant cells. The U2-OS/Pt cells exhibited a degree of resistance to cisplatin of approximately 6. In U2-OS cells, BBR 3464 displayed a marked cytotoxic potency as compared to cisplatin and a complete lack of cross-resistance was found in U2-OS/Pt cells (Table 1).
To investigate the cellular basis of the capability of BBR 3464 to overcome cisplatin resistance, we performed
Conclusions
The present study indicates that the multinuclear platinum complex, BBR 3464, is a potent cytotoxic agent which overcomes multiple mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. The cellular basis of the cytotoxic potency appears to be related to the extent of cellular accumulation and DNA platination. In particular, the observed amount of DNA binding supports an increased affinity of BBR 3464 for DNA, as expected from the presence of two reactive platinum centres and on the positive charge of the
Abbreviations
ICL interstrand cross-link MMR DNA mismatch repair
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Progetto Finalizzato ‘Applicazioni Cliniche della Ricerca Oncologica’), the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro and the Ministero della Sanità.
References (13)
- et al.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
(1999) - et al.
Biochemistry
(1999) - et al.
Br. J. Cancer
(1999) - et al.
Proc. Am. Ass. Cancer Res.
(1997) - et al.
Clin. Cancer Res.
(1996) Methods Cancer Res.
(1979)
Cited by (75)
Recent advancements in Nanotechnology-Mediated Platinum-Based cancer therapy
2024, Coordination Chemistry ReviewsBiomedical applications of multinuclear Pt(II)/Ru(II)/Ir(III) metallo-supramolecular assemblies for intensive cancer therapy
2023, Coordination Chemistry ReviewsHomo and heterobimetallic palladium and platinum complexes bearing μ-diphosphane bridges involved in biological studies
2021, European Journal of Medicinal ChemistryMultifunctional, heterometallic ruthenium-platinum complexes with medicinal applications
2019, Coordination Chemistry ReviewsPlatinum coordination compounds with potent anticancer activity
2018, Coordination Chemistry ReviewsCitation Excerpt :This approach increases affinity for DNA [69,70]. BBR3564 exhibits in vitro and in vivo potency [59,72,74–79], forming DNA adducts that the repair proteins are unable to recognise [77,78,80]. Partial responses by patients, in phase II clinical trials, together with substantial neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity and other side effects limited the maximum tolerated dose [81,82].