Critical survey on the biomechanical criterion in the NIOSH method for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00049-3Get rights and content

Abstract

In 1981, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) published a comprehensive guide for the evaluation and design of manual lifting, based on epidemiological, physiological, psychophysical, and biomechanical knowledge. A revised version of the easy-to-use “NIOSH lifting equation” was provided in 1991 considering occasional new findings from literature. For assessing the load on the lumbar spine during lifting, a limit of 3.4 kN for lumbosacral disc compression was introduced. Regarding this biomechanical criterion, several inconsistancies and discrepancies are revealed when comparing the NIOSH substantiation approaches and the respective data of the literature sources: For example, essential results referred to by NIOSH or NIOSH-authorized presenters are not included in or cannot be reproduced from the cited sources. Furthermore, the epidemiological studies showing the relationships between low-back disorder incidence rates and lumbar mechanical exposures cannot be used for confirming the 3.4 kN value as an appropriate limit. It is concluded that the 3.4 kN criterion is substantiated neither epidemiologically nor biomechanically by the provided sources. More comprehensive data compilations, available in the meantime, may be regarded as a better background for the derivation of lumbar load limits in order to diminish the individual overexertion risk during manual materials handling.


Relevance to industry

NIOSH has provided a multi-disciplinarily justified lifting guide for evaluation and design of lifting tasks. A critical survey of the cited sources shows that the considered biomechanical criterion is only weakly substantiated.

Introduction

The Work Practices Guide for Manual Lifting provided by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of USA (NIOSH, 1981) or the “Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation” (Putz-Anderson and Waters, 1991; Waters et al., 1993, Waters et al., 1994), respectively, is accepted as a valuable tool for the design and evaluation of manual lifting in ergonomics and occupational health. Many industries have found the Work Practices Guide to be very useful in identifying problems and reducing injuries. Moreover, the NIOSH method has gained considerable recognition in the drafting of European and international standards (CEN, 1996; ISO, 1995). Therefore, knowledge of the scientific basis, its reliability and comprehensiveness is of great interest and relevance. In this context, the aim of this paper is to scrutinize the biomechanical criterion considered in the NIOSH method, in particular, with respect to the material referred to in the cited sources. In addition, hints will be given toward a more comprehensive basis for the derivation of recommendations with regard to the lumbar load-bearing capacity. Consequently, the aim is not to question the NIOSH method with its undoubtedly helpful physiological and psychophysical components, but to give additional help in the evaluation of its biomechanical background.

Section snippets

1981-Approach for confirming the disc-compression limits

In the Work Practices Guide for Manual Lifting (NIOSH, 1981), “recommendations to control the various types of hazards associated with the unaided act of symmetric (two-handed) lifting of an object of known weight and size” are provided. This guideline introduces, inter alia, biomechanical informations regarding the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. The biomechanical approach is based on the evaluation model to relate (predicted) lumbosacral disc compression to the ultimate

Discussion

In comparison with the epidemiologically related approach in the Work Practices Guide (NIOSH, 1981), which was restricted to one study only, the argumentation was designed more diverse within the revision procedure of the NIOSH method. However, no additional validation aspects which could be interpreted as justifying the adopted value were actually offered so that the seemingly enlarged low-back-disorder related discussion can be traced back to the justification approach provided 1981. The

Conclusions

Although several critical issues were considered in this survey, the Work Practices Guide for Manual Lifting provided by NIOSH (1981)remains, nevertheless, a valuable compendium for ergonomists and practitioners, demonstrating the wide scope of stress-and-strain influences and consequences for persons performing manual materials handling tasks during a working life. From the attempts provided by NIOSH or in approved publications to confirm the criterion “350 kg/3.4 kN compression on the

References (23)

  • M. Jäger et al.

    Lumbar load during one-handed bricklaying

    International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

    (1991)
  • C.K. Anderson

    A biomechanical model of the lumbosacral joint for lifting activities. Ph.D. Dissertation

    (1983)
  • Brinckmann, P., Biggemann, M., Hilweg, D., 1988. Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae. Clinical Biomechanics 3...
  • Bringham, C.J., Garg, A., 1983. The role of biomechanical job evaluation in the reduction of overexertion injuries: a...
  • CEN, 1996. Safety of machinery – Human physical performance – Part 2: Manual handling of machinery and component parts...
  • D.B. Chaffin et al.

    A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal

    (1973)
  • F.G. Evans et al.

    Biomechanical studies on the lumbar spine and pelvis

    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American)

    (1959)
  • Garg, A., 1991. Biomechanical basis for manual lifting guidelines. In: National Technical Information Service...
  • A.M. Genaidy et al.

    Spinal compression tolerance limits for the design of manual material handling operations in the workplace

    Ergonomics

    (1993)
  • T. Hansson et al.

    The relation between bone mineral content, experimental compression fractures, and disc degeneration in lumbar vertebrae

    Spine

    (1981)
  • G.D. Herrin et al.

    Prediction of overexertion injuries using biomechanical and psychophysical models

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text