Quality of life: A dynamic construct

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00339-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The principle of Einstein's theory of special relativity is that an observer of an apparently moving body cannot be sure if the body really has moved, if he/she has moved or if both events have occurred. Although Einstein was discussing physical events, a similar hypothesis may apply to quality of life. When using quality of life instruments, one presumes that the point of reference (the observer in Einstein's terms) does not move, i.e. that an individual's attitude towards a particular construct will remain stable. Otherwise, changes in response to particular variables cannot be interpreted. However, attitudes are not constant: they vary with time and experience and are modified by such psychological phenomena as adaptation, coping, expectancy, optimism, self-control and self-concept. For example, eating problems may be extremely important at one point in a person's life. However, when oral discomfort has been diagnosed as cancer and treated with surgery or radiation, the same individual may “objectively” demonstrate more problems when eating, but report them as less because they have now become relatively unimportant. Furthermore, paradoxical reports that some groups of ill individuals rate their quality of life higher than do “healthy” persons raise similar questions concerning betweendashgroup point of reference differences. Investigators in the fields of organisational management, education and psychology have developed techniques such as “then ratings”, saliency indicators and individualised questionnaires in attempts to quantify withindashsubject variability and betweendashgroup differences pertaining to point of reference. We suggest that similar methods may help us to measure change in the impact of the different items of quality of life instruments. In this paper, we will describe the theories of change associated with quality of life measurement. In addition, we will present evidence suggesting that the point of reference does change, the reasons for this and possible solutions to the problem.

References (65)

  • F.M. Andrews et al.

    Measures of self-reported well-being: their affectice, cognitive and other components

    Social Indicators Research

    (1980)
  • A. Bandura

    Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behaviour change

    Psychology Review

    (1977)
  • A. Bandura

    Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency

    American Psychologist

    (1982)
  • P. Brickman et al.

    Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative?

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1978)
  • B. Bunk et al.

    The affective consequences of social comparison: either direction has its ups and downs

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1990)
  • K.C. Calman

    Quality of life in cancer patients—an hypothesis

    Journal of Medical Ethics

    (1984)
  • A. Campbell

    Subjective measures of well-being

    American Psychologist

    (1976)
  • C.S. Carver et al.

    Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality—social, clinical and health psychology

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1982)
  • D.F. Cella et al.

    Quality of life in cancer: definition, purpose and method of measurement

    Cancer Investigation

    (1993)
  • K. Chamberlain et al.

    Stability and change in subjective well-being over short time-periods

    Social Indicators Research

    (1992)
  • C. Cohen

    On the quality of life: some philosophical reflections

    Circulation

    (1982)
  • P.T. Costa et al.

    Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1980)
  • L.J. Cronbach et al.

    How we should measure “change”—or should we?

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1970)
  • S.D. Decker et al.

    Correlates of life satisfaction and depression in middle-aged and elderly spinal cord injured patients

    American Journal of Occupational Therapy

    (1985)
  • P. De Grandmont et al.

    Evaluation of patients' satisfaction in prosthodontics

    Journal of Dental Research

    (1991)
  • E. Deiner

    Subjective well-being

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1984)
  • J.S. Englert et al.

    Implications of the concepts of coping and quality of life for criteria of course and outcome

    Pharmacopsychiatrica

    (1994)
  • J.S. Feine et al.

    Is treatment success due to faulty memory of chronic pain?

    Journal of Dental Research

    (1989)
  • C.E. Ferrans et al.

    Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties

    Advances in Nursing Science

    (1985)
  • C. Ferrans

    Development of a quality of life index for patients with cancer

  • S. Folkman et al.

    An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample

    Journal of Health and Social Behaviour

    (1980)
  • R.T. Golembiewski et al.

    Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: types of change generated by OD designs

    Journal of Applied Behavioural Science

    (1976)
  • View full text