A brain perspective on language mechanisms: from discrete neuronal ensembles to serial order

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00014-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Language is constituted by discrete building blocks, sounds and words, which can be concatenated according to serial order principles. The neurobiological organization of these building blocks, in particular words, has been illuminated by recent metabolic and neurophysiological imaging studies. When humans process words of different kinds, various sets of cortical areas have been found to become active differentially. The old concept of two language centers processing all words alike must therefore be replaced by a model according to which words are organized as discrete distributed neuron ensembles that differ in their cortical topographies. The meaning of a word, more precisely, aspects of its reference, may be crucial for determining which set of cortical areas becomes involved in its processing. Whereas the serial order of sounds constituting a word may be established by serially aligned sets of neurons called synfire chains, different mechanisms are necessary for establishing word order in sentences. The serial order of words may be organized by higher-order neuronal sets, called sequence detectors here, which are being activated by sequential excitation of neuronal sets representing words. Sets of sequence detectors are proposed to process aspects of the syntactic information contained in a sentence. Other syntactic rules can be related to general features of the dynamics of cortical activation and deactivation. These postulates about the brain mechanisms of language, which are rooted in principles known from neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, may provide a framework for theory-driven neuroscientific research on language.

Section snippets

Explaining language in terms of neurons

Recent advances in the neuroscientific investigation of cognition make it possible to spell out cognitive mechanisms in terms of neurons and to propose neuroscientific explanations of cognitive processes. An explanation deduces a variety of facts from a few principles or axioms. The axioms themselves must be non-disputable or well established by empirical evidence. This article shows that a few neuroscientific principles can explain important aspects of the neurophysiology of language. Four

Principles

The human cerebral cortex is a network of more than 10 billion neurons. Each neuron represents an information processor whose output is a function of the input it receives from many other neurons with which it is interwoven. The following principles are proposed to reflect universal neuroanatomical and neurophysiological properties of the human cortex:

  • (I)

    Afferent and efferent projections are ordered. They reach, or take their origin from, well-defined areas within which the projections are

Functional webs in the cortex

The cortex is a network of neurons characterized by ordered input and output connections in modality-specific areas, by multimodal merging of information through short- and long-distance connections, and by correlation learning. Such a device can serve the function of linking neurons responding to specific features of input patterns and neurons controlling aspects of the motor output. Because different primary areas are not linked directly, additional neurons in non-primary areas are necessary

Functional cortical webs and their putative role in processing words

The cortex, a neuroanatomically defined associative memory obeying the correlation learning principle, allows for the formation of distributed functional webs. During language acquisition, the neurobiological principles governing the cortex give rise to the neuronal machinery underlying language. Three qualitatively different types of functional webs are proposed to be relevant for realizing spoken language in the cortex: networks linking information about articulatory movements and acoustic

Serial order in the brain

In language use, words usually occur in sequences. They are part of sentences of several words; although early in infancy, single-word utterances play an important role, and also later in life, communication using single-word utterances is common. The majority of utterances, however, are composed of several words that follow each other according to rules. How may the rules governing serial order of language elements be realized in the brain?

This question can be asked with regard to the level of

An overview of putative language mechanisms

The main proposals about language processing in the brain discussed in this review were the following:

  • (1)

    Phonological word forms are represented and processed by strongly connected discrete neuron ensembles distributed over the perisylvian cortical areas and strongly lateralized to the language-dominant hemisphere. The activation of word-related functional webs may underlie the neurophysiological and metabolic differences between words and pseudo-words, in particular the early word-related

Acknowledgements

I thank Valentino Braitenberg, Almut Schüz, Bettina Mohr, and Ramin Assadollahi who, in countless discussions, contributed ideas to the framework presented here. The comments and stimulating input from the following colleagues are also thankfully acknowledged: Horace Barlow, Olaf Hauk, Sarah Hawkins, Detlef Heck, Markus Kiefer, William Marslen-Wilson, Peter M. Milner, Risto Näätänen, Bettina Neininger, Dennis Norris, Mike P. Page and Yury Shtyrov. I am grateful to Christine Zwierzanski for

References (194)

  • J.T. Devlin et al.

    Is there an anatomical basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI

    Neuropsychologia

    (2002)
  • J.L. Elman

    Finding structure in time

    Cogn. Sci.

    (1990)
  • A.D. Friederici et al.

    Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations

    Cogn. Brain Res.

    (1993)
  • J.M. Fuster

    Network memory

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • T.J. Grabowski et al.

    Premotor and prefrontal correlates of category-related lexical retrieval

    Neuroimage

    (1998)
  • H. Hecaen et al.

    Cerebral organization in left-handers

    Brain Lang.

    (1981)
  • P. Indefrey et al.

    Syntactic processing in left prefrontal cortex is independent of lexical meaning

    Neuroimage

    (2001)
  • B. Jacobs et al.

    Quantitative dendritic and spine analyses of speech cortices: a case study

    Brain Lang.

    (1993)
  • R.M. Kaplan

    Augmented transition networks as psychological models of sentence comprehension

    Artif. Intell.

    (1972)
  • M. Kiefer et al.

    The limits of a distributed account of conceptual knowledge

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2001)
  • D. Kleinfeld et al.

    Associative neural network model for the generation of temporal patterns. Theory and application to central pattern generators

    Biophys. J.

    (1988)
  • T. Koenig et al.

    Microstates in language-related brain potential maps show noun–verb differences

    Brain Lang.

    (1996)
  • P. Korpilahti et al.

    Early and late mismatch negativity elicited by words and speech-like stimuli in children

    Brain Lang.

    (2001)
  • C.M. Krause et al.

    Automatic auditory word perception as measured by 40 Hz EEG responses

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1998)
  • G. Le Clec’H et al.

    Distinct cortical areas for names of numbers and body parts independent of language and input modality

    Neuroimage

    (2000)
  • W. Lutzenberger et al.

    Words and pseudowords elicit distinct patterns of 30-Hz activity in humans

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1994)
  • W. Marslen-Wilson et al.

    The temporal structure of spoken language understanding

    Cognition

    (1980)
  • Abeles, M., 1991. Corticonics—Neural Circuits of the Cerebral Cortex. Cambridge University Press,...
  • M. Abeles et al.

    Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1993)
  • E. Ahissar et al.

    Dependence of cortical plasticity on correlated activity of single neurons and on behavior context

    Science

    (1992)
  • R. Assadollahi et al.

    Neuromagnetic evidence for early access to cognitive representations

    Neuroreport

    (2001)
  • T.H. Bak et al.

    Selective impairment of verb processing associated with pathological changes in Brodmann areas 44 and 45 in the motor neurone disease–dementia–aphasia syndrome

    Brain

    (2001)
  • H. Barlow

    Single units and cognition: a neurone doctrine for perceptual psychology

    Perception

    (1972)
  • H. Barlow et al.

    The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit’s retina

    J. Physiol.

    (1965)
  • H. Barlow et al.

    Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit

    J. Physiol.

    (1964)
  • J.K. Bock et al.

    From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1992)
  • Braitenberg, V., 1978a. Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In: Heim, R., Palm, G. (Eds.), Theoretical Approaches...
  • Braitenberg, V., 1978b. Cortical architectonics: general and areal. In: Brazier, M.A.B., Petsche, H. (Eds.),...
  • Braitenberg, V., 1980. Alcune considerazione sui meccanismi cerebrali del linguaggio. In: Braga, G., Braitenberg, V.,...
  • V. Braitenberg et al.

    Entwurf einer neurologischen Theorie der Sprache

    Naturwissenschaften

    (1992)
  • Braitenberg, V., Schüz, A., 1992. Basic features of cortical connectivity and some considerations on language. In:...
  • Braitenberg, V., Schüz, A., 1998. Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity. Springer,...
  • V. Braitenberg et al.

    The detection and generation of sequences as a key to cerebellar function: experiments and theory

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (1997)
  • P. Broca

    Remarques sur la siège de la faculté de la parole articulée, suivies d’une observation d’aphémie (perte de parole)

    Bulletin de la Société d’Anatomie

    (1861)
  • Brodmann, K., 1909. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Groβhirnrinde. Barth,...
  • W.S. Brown et al.

    Verb and noun meaning of homophone words activate different cortical generators: a topographic study of evoked potential fields

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1979)
  • D.V. Buonomano

    Decoding temporal information: a model based on short-term synaptic plasticity

    J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • D.V. Buonomano et al.

    Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • S.F. Cappa et al.

    Object and action naming in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia

    Neurology

    (1998)
  • M. Cheour et al.

    Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (110)

    • Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication

      2018, Progress in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, distributional semantic theories use the co-occurrence statistics of words in texts to define their semantic similarity (Landauer and Dumais, 1997), so that words that frequently co-occur with similar sets of context words within standard texts are considered as closely related semantically. Correlation mapping according to Hebbian learning principles provides an obvious pathway to ‘brain-implementing’ word-word correlations as they are relevant for defining semantic similarity in a distributional sense (Pulvermüller, 2002a, 2012). In this perspective, the associative connections between word-related APCs provide the mechanism for storing aspects of symbolic meaning.

    • Spread the word: MMN brain response reveals whole-form access of discontinuous particle verbs

      2017, Brain and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      The “lexical” MMN response has also been reported for whole-form stored complex words, including derivational morphemes, but not for roots with more flexibly attached inflectional morphology (Bakker et al., 2013; Hanna et al., 2014; Leminen et al., 2013). That the brain responses in passive MMN paradigms are stronger for real words than for pseudowords can be modelled and explained by the following neurobiological mechanism: Encountering a stored word activates a strongly connected set of neurons that form a distributed memory circuit, which jointly stores information about a word’s form and its semantics (Garagnani & Pulvermüller, 2016; Pulvermüller, 2002a, 2002b; Pulvermüller et al., 2012; Tomasello et al., 2016). By contrast, hearing an unfamiliar syllable sequence, or pseudoword, would only activate a phonemic and acoustic neuronal network, but obviously no dense neuronal circuit storing the knowledge about a familiar and meaningful sound sequence and lexical unit (Pulvermüller et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text