Elsevier

Gene

Volume 210, Issue 1, 27 March 1998, Pages 1-7
Gene

Methylation-mediated regulation of the glutathione S-transferase P1 gene in human breast cancer cells

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00021-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms that regulate the human pi class GST (GSTP1) gene expression in breast cancer cells is of particular importance to the study of breast cancer biology. In cultured human breast cancer cell lines, GSTP1 is exclusively expressed in estrogen receptor-negative (ER−) cells but is undetectable in receptor-positive (ER+) cells. Previously, we examined transiently transfected GSTP1 promoter activities, in vitro GSTP1 promoter–DNA interactions, and GSTP1 mRNA stability. These studies indicated that transiently transfected GSTP1 promoter elements and GSTP1 mRNA stability could only partially explain cell line-specific expression of endogenous GSTP1. In the present study, we examined whether the methylation status of the GSTP1 CpG island plays an important role in GSTP1 regulation. Southern blot analysis revealed that the GSTP1 CpG island is hypermethlyated in ER+, GSTP1 non-expressing cell lines but is undermethylated in ER−, GSTP1 expressing cell lines. Moreover, partial demethylation of the GSTP1 CpG island by treatment with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine resulted in de novo gene expression in ER+ cell lines, as detected by RT-PCR, Northern blot and Western blot analyses. Our data strongly indicate that methylation status of the promoter contributes significantly to the levels of GSTP1 expressed in ER− and ER+ breast cancer cell lines.

Introduction

Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are a multigene family of enzymes that catalyse the conjugation of glutathione with electrophilic, hydrophobic compounds, including carcinogens, natural toxins and exogenous drugs (Coles and Ketterer, 1990; Hayes and Pulford, 1995; Mannervik and Danielson, 1988; Tew, 1994). The resulting complex formed by this reaction is usually less toxic than the parent xenobiotic and is eventually metabolized and exported via glutathione-dependent transport systems (Ishikawa, 1992). Because of these conjugating activities, GSTs are believed to be vital in mediating a variety of normal cellular detoxification reactions.

The pi class GST (GSTP1-1) is of particular interest to the study of breast cancer biology. In breast cancer cells, increased GSTP1 expression is associated with other altered biological properties. In cultured breast cancer cells, GSTP1 is exclusively expressed in estrogen receptor-negative (ER−) cells but not in receptor-positive (ER+) cells (Moscow et al., 1988). In addition, GSTP1 is coordinately expressed with other genes, including epidermal growth factor receptor, protein kinase C and glutathione peroxidase (Borner et al., 1987; Davidson et al., 1987; Townsend et al., 1991), and inversely related to cytochrome P4501A1 expression (Vickers et al., 1989). In some ER+ cultured breast cancer cells, repeated exposure of these cells to certain anticancer agents results in a multidrug resistant phenotype associated with increased GSTP1 expression and other altered biochemical properties, including the loss of ER expression (Batist et al., 1986). The coordinated expression of these genes suggests that GSTP1 and these other genes may share common regulatory mechanisims in breast cancer cells. Consequently, determination of processes that regulate GSTP1 expression is of considerable importance to breast cancer biology.

To investigate the regulatory mechanisms involved in differential GSTP1 expression, we employed model breast cancer cell lines that either express (ER−) or do not express (ER+) GSTP1. Previously, we examined transiently transfected GSTP1 promoter activities, in vitro GSTP1 promoter–DNA interactions and GSTP1 mRNA stability. These studies indicated that efficiency of expression from transiently transfected GSTP1 promoter elements and GSTP1 mRNA stability could not fully explain cell line-specific expression of endogenous GSTP1 (Jhaveri and Morrow, 1998; Jhaveri et al., 1997; Morrow et al., 1992). In the present study, we evaluate whether DNA methylation is involved in modulating GSTP1 promoter activity. In cancer cells, methylation of genes within a GC-rich region is frequently associated with diminished transcriptional activity (Graff et al., 1995; Herman et al., 1996; Ottaviano et al., 1994). The 5′ region of GSTP1 contains GC rich regions, including a CpG island (Cowell et al., 1988; Morrow et al., 1989). Methylation of these sequences could potentially contribute to GSTP1 silencing in non-expressing cells. Indeed, in prostate cancer, loss of GSTP1 expression is associated with increased methylation of GSTP1 GC-rich sequences (Lee et al., 1994). Here we present evidence that DNA methylation plays a significant role in modulating GSTP1 expression in breast cancer cell lines. GSTP1 is hypermethylated in non-expressing cells but undermethylated in expressing cells. Furthermore, treatment of non-expressing cell lines with a demethylating agent activates GSTP1 expression and this expression is associated with decreased methylation of the GSTP1 promoter.

Section snippets

Cell culture and reagents

Two ER+ (MCF7 and ZR-75B) and two ER− (Hs578T and MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C in 5% CO2. For some experiments, media was supplemented with 0.25 or 0.75 μM of aza dC (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Medium, plus or minus drug, was replaced every 4 days. Total cellular RNA, genomic DNA, or protein were prepared from cells using standard procedures at the indicated time points

CpG island within the 5′ region of GSTP1

The presence of a CpG-rich island in the 5′ flanking region of GSTP1 was initially recognized by Cowell et al. (1988). In order to examine if the methylation status influences GSTP1 expression in breast cancer cells, we have defined the precise location and boundaries of the GSTP1 CpG island. CpG sequences are underrepresented relative to GpC sequences (Bird, 1986; Tykocinski and Max, 1984). However, CpG-rich clusters, or `islands' have been identified and can be defined as regions in which the

Discussion

The results presented in this paper indicate that DNA methylation plays an important role in the regulation of GSTP1 expression in human breast cancer cells. This conclusion is based upon the following observations. Normally GSTP1 is exclusively expressed in ER− but not ER+ cells. Southern blot analysis shows that the proximal promoter located within the GSTP1 CpG island is more densely methylated in ER+ than in ER− cells (Fig. 2). Treatment of ER+ cells with aza dC results in simultaneous de

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to A.J. Townsend for his critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grant CA64579 (C.S.M.) and predoctoral fellowship GM16436 (M.S.J.).

References (41)

  • C.S. Morrow et al.

    Regulation of human glutathione S-transferase pi gene transcription: influence of 5′-flanking sequences and trans-activating factors which recognize AP-1-binding sites

    Gene

    (1990)
  • C.S. Morrow et al.

    Posttranscriptional control of glutathione S-transferase pi gene expression in human breast cancer cells

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1992)
  • C.L. Xia et al.

    Glutathione transferase π its minimal promoter and downstream cis-acting element

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.

    (1991)
  • R.L.P. Adams

    DNA methylation: The effect of minor bases on DNA–protein interactions

    Biochem. J.

    (1990)
  • Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A., Struhl, K., 1997. Current Protocols...
  • A.P. Bird

    CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation

    Nature

    (1986)
  • C. Borner et al.

    Immunological quantitation of phospholipid/Ca2+-dependent protein kinase of human mammary carcinoma cells: inverse relationship to estrogen receptors

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1987)
  • J. Boyes et al.

    Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein

    EMBO J.

    (1992)
  • B. Coles et al.

    The role of glutathione and glutathione transferases in chemical carcinogenesis

    Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (1990)
  • I.G. Cowell et al.

    The structure of the glutathione S-transferase π gene

    Biochem. J.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text