Original article
Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric studyLes complications de la technique de Longo: étude multicentrique française

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-8320(05)80798-5Get rights and content

Summary

Objectives

The aim of this retrospective multicentric study was to assess the complications of the Longo technique for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease.

Methods

From March 1999 to April 2003, 550 patients underwent a stapled hemorrhoidectomy following Longo's technique in 12 surgical units in the Rhône-Alpes Region. The operative indications were the same as for conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Complications were divided into early or late complications depending on whether they occurred before or after the 7<sup>th</sup> day. For each patient, the most serious complication was retained for analysis.

Results

One hundred and five patients (19%), mean age 51 years, experienced complications. The early complications were bleeding (1.8%), severe anal pain (2.3%), urinary retention (0.9%) and sepsis (0.5%). Late complications were chronic anal pain (1.6%), suture dehiscence (1.6%), anal stricture (1.6%), anal fissure (0.9%), external thrombosis (0.9%), fistulae and intramural abscesses (0.9%), anal incontinence (0.3%), haemorrhoidal disease symptoms persistence or recurrence (3.2%). Strictures were successfully dilated, fissures were treated by sphincterotomy, external thromboses were excised and fistulae were laid open. Most of the recurrences were treated with the Milligan-Morgan hemorroidectomy technique.

Conclusion

Complications may occur after stapled hemorrhoidopexy, some are particularly serious, especially bleeding and sepsis.

Résumé

Objectifs

L’objectif de cette étude rétrospective multicentrique était d’analyser les complications de la technique de Longo dans le traitement de la maladie hémorroïdaire.

Méthodes

Du 1er mars 1999 au 31 avril 2003, 550 malades ont été opérés selon la technique de Longo dans 12 centres de la région Rhône-Alpes. Les indications opératoires étaient celles de l’hémorroïdectomie classique. Les complications ont été séparées en complications précoces lorsqu’elles survenaient avant le 7e jour postopératoire et en complications tardives au-delà. Pour chaque malade, seule la complication la plus sévère a été prise en compte.

Résultats

Cent-cinq malades (19 %) d’une moyenne d’âge de 51 ans ont présenté au moins une complication. Les complications précoces étaient des hémorragies (1,8 %), des douleurs anales majeures (2,3 %), des troubles urinaires (0,9 %) et des abcès (0,5 %). Les complications tardives étaient des douleurs chroniques (1,6 %), des déhiscences de suture (1,6 %), des sténoses anales (1,6 %), des fissures anales (0,9 %), des thromboses hémorroïdaires externes (0,9 %), des fistules et des abcès intra-muraux (0,9 %), une incontinence anale (0,3 %) et la persistance ou la reprise d’une maladie hémorroïdaire (3,2 %). Les sténoses ont été dilatées avec succès, les fissures ont été traitées par sphinctérotomie avec ou sans anoplastie, toutes les thromboses hémorroïdaires ont été excisées, les abcès et les fistules ont été mis à plat avec un lambeau d’abaissement sous couvert d’une colostomie dans un cas. La plupart des «récidives» ont été traitées selon la technique de Milligan et Morgan.

Conclusion

Des complications peuvent survenir après anopexie circulaire. Certaines d’entre elles peuvent être graves, en particulier les complications hémorragiques et infectieuses.

References (31)

  • M. Rowsell et al.

    Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • P. Roos

    Haemorrhoid surgery revised

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • P.A. Lehur et al.

    Transsection transanale du rectum pour rupture de varices anorectales. Une nouvelle technique

    Gastroenterol Clin Biol

    (1989)
  • F.H. Hetzer et al.

    Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial

    Arch Surg

    (2002)
  • E. Ganio et al.

    Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy

    Br J Surg

    (2001)
  • Cited by (91)

    • Repair of anal stenosis using a prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) stapler procedure: A case report with excellent results

      2020, International Journal of Surgery Open
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hemorrhoidectomy is the most common cause of anal stenosis, with an incidence ranging from 1.5% to 3.8% [4]. In two retrospective studies, it was stated that the incidence of anal stenosis after PPH stapler was 8.8% and 1.6% [10,11]. Hemorrhoidectomy might strip a wide area of anoderm and rectal mucosa from the lining of the anal canal, leading to scarring and progressive chronic stricture formation making the anus less pliable.

    • Short- and long-term results of harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy versus stapler hemorrhoidopexy in treatment of hemorrhoidal disease

      2015, Asian Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cheetham et al21 reported pain in 31% of patients who underwent SH; by contrast, Ravo et al,22 in their study encompassing 12 centers and including 1107 patients, reported severe pain in 5% of patients at postoperative Week 1. These findings concur with Oughriss et al's23 study, where early and late complications of the technique were investigated and the presence of severe pain was determined in 2.3% of cases. In a multicenter randomized clinical trial, Thaha et al24 compared SH and closed hemorrhoidectomy and defined “pain after defecation” as a special complication related to stapler use, although it was not demonstrated in following studies.

    • Ligation under vision in the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids: A preliminary experience

      2015, Asian Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many studies comparing SH with conventional hemorrhoidectomy have demonstrated SH to be less painful. However, it was less effective in preventing recurrence, more expensive, and liable to rare but severe complications such as rectal perforation, obstruction, retroperitoneal hematoma, Fournier's gangrene, and rectovaginal fistula.16–18 DGHAL is an effective, minimally invasive alternative procedure for the surgical treatment of HD.3–6,9,12,19

    • Longo procedure (stapled hemorrhoidopexy): Indications, results

      2015, Journal de Chirurgie Viscerale
      Citation Excerpt :

      Urgency is seen in 5 to 31% of patients after SH [2,18,19] but this symptom is most often transitory and disappears within three months. Sever and sometimes fatal complications are the exception, but have been reported (gas gangrene, rectal perforation, rectovaginal fistula, pneumomediastinum, complete rectal stricture); similar complications are seen as well with conventional surgery or instrumental procedures [20,21]. In published series, SH has not been shown to cause anal continence but there are several theoretical risks for sphincter injury: the anal dilatation required to introduce the dilator and stapler, staple division in the anal canal at too low a level, inclusion of muscular fibers in the circular resection (more from the rectum than the internal sphincter) in 36 to 100% of the ring specimens analyzed.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text