Differentiation of metastatic versus non-metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using respiratory-triggered short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) turbo spin-echo MR imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00271-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives: To differentiate between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using respiratory-triggered short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) turbo spin-echo (SE) MR imaging. Methods and patients: One hundred and forty mediastinal lymph nodes were detected in 25 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent respiratory-triggered STIR turbo SE imaging. Ratios of signal intensity of lymph nodes to 0.9% saline phantoms (lymph node-saline ratio) were compared by Student's t-test using the pathological diagnosis as the gold standard. The threshold value of the lymph node-saline ratio was determined for a positive test, and tested for its capability to provide a differential diagnosis. Results: One hundred and forty lymph nodes were diagnosed and classified into two groups: metastatic lymph node (n=21) and non-metastatic lymph node (n=119). The mean lymph node-saline ratio in the non-metastatic lymph node group (0.42±0.01; mean±standard error) was significantly lower than that of the metastatic lymph node group (0.77±0.02, P<0.0001). When 0.6 was adapted as the threshold for a positive test, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating metastatic lymph node from non-metastatic lymph node per lymph nodes were 100, 96, and 96%, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating metastatic lymph node from non-metastatic lymph node per patients were 100, 75, and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: Both metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer were well differentiated using respiratory-triggered STIR turbo SE imaging.

Introduction

Accurate tumor staging is essential for choosing the appropriate treatment strategy for lung cancer patients. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with ipsilateral hilar (N1 disease) and mediastinal lymph node metastasis (N2 disease) are considered to have potentially resectable disease. If contralateral mediastinal lymph node metastases (N3 disease) are present, surgery is generally not indicated. Due to the substantial limitation of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in depicting mediastinal lymph node metastases, mediastinoscopy with biopsy is necessary for adequate assessment of hilar and mediastinal nodes [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

Historically, CT and MR imaging criteria for tumor involvement have relied on lymph node size. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. However, in some cases, a normal-sized regional lymph node may prove to have metastases by histologic examination, and nodal enlargement can be due to reactive hyperplasia or other nonmalignant conditions [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

On the other hand, promising results using positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) or [carbon-11]-chorine have been reported [11], [12], [13], [14]. PET imaging has been utilized to differentiate metastatic lymph nodes from non-metastatic lymph nodes based on the biochemical mechanism of increased glucose metabolism or duplication of tumor cell [11], [12], [13], [14]; however, elevated glucose metabolism may be secondary to tumor, infection or inflammation [15], [16]. Moreover, the diagnostic capability of the FDG-PET imaging is limited because standard uptake values of FDG-PET are affected by size of lymph nodes [11].

Recently, some investigators have discussed the utility of short inversion time (TI) inversion recovery (STIR) imaging for detection of metastatic tumors and metastatic lymph nodes [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. The STIR turbo spin-echo (SE) is a simple sequence which can be easily incorporated into clinical protocol. In this study, we hypothesized that respiratory-triggered STIR turbo SE imaging can be used to differentiate metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Section snippets

Subjects

One hundred-forty mediastinal lymph nodes in 25 patients with suspected T1 and T2 non-small cell lung cancer by chest radiographs (CXR, 19 males, six females; mean age, 64.5 years; age range, 39–76 years) were included in this study. All patients were enrolled in the study after they were properly informed and gave consent to participate. All patients prospectively underwent contrast-enhanced CT, MR imaging and thoracotomy for lung cancer. The diagnosis of lung cancer was based on pathological

Results

Thirteen out of 25 patients were pathologically diagnosed as having metastases within mediastinal lymph nodes. In 25 patients, 21 of 140 lymph nodes were pathologically diagnosed as metastatic lymph nodes, and 119 lymph nodes were diagnosed as non-metastatic lymph nodes including five inflammatory nodes (lymphatic edema: n=4, and sarcoid reaction: n=1), 29 silicotic nodes, 24 calcified nodes, 17 anthracosilicostic nodes, 14 fibrostic nodes, eight coagulation necroses, and 22 normal lymph nodes.

Discussion

Our study indicated that the detectability of lymph nodes using respiratory-triggered STIR turbo SE imaging was higher than that of CT and T1- weighted SE imaging. Moreover, the lymph node-saline ratio of the metastatic lymph node group was significantly higher than that of the non-metastatic lymph node group, with complete separation between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes except inflammatory lymph nodes.

Overlap of the lymph node-saline ratio in metastatic lymph nodes and

References (35)

  • G.M. Glazer et al.

    The mediastinum in non-small cell lung cancer: CT-surgical correlation

    Am. J. Roentgenol.

    (1984)
  • D. Musset et al.

    Primary lung cancer staging: prospective comparative study of MR imaging with CT

    Radiology

    (1986)
  • P.Y. Poon et al.

    Mediastinal lymph node metastases from bronchogenic carcinoma: detection with MR imaging and CT

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • F. Laurent et al.

    Bronchogenic carcinoma staging: CT versus MR imaging. Assessment with surgery

    Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.

    (1988)
  • P. Grenier et al.

    Preoperative thoracic staging of lung cancer: CT and MR evaluation

    Diagn. Intervent. Radiol.

    (1989)
  • G.M. Glazer et al.

    Imaging of the pulmonary hilum: a prospective comparative study in patients with lung cancer

    Am. J. Roentgenol.

    (1985)
  • K. Higashi et al.

    Comparison of fluorine-18-FDG PET and thallium-201 SPECT in evaluation of lung cancer

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Update of MR Imaging for Evaluation of Lung Cancer

      2018, Radiologic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition to nodal size, the addition of increased T1 and T2 relaxation times in STIR turbo SE imaging yields a significantly higher net tissue contrast for malignant lymph nodes than for benign lymph nodes. Previous studies reported a range for the sensitivity of quantitatively and qualitatively assessed STIR turbo SE imaging, on a per-patient basis, from 83.7% to 100%, for specificity from 74.4% to 96%, and for accuracy from 83% to 92%, and these values were equal to or higher than those for CE CT, FDG-PET, or PET/CT scanning.7–9,114 Another study, however, found that the quantitatively and qualitatively assessed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of STIR turbo SE imaging were not significantly different from those of FDG-PET/CT.117 In contrast, the combination of FDG-PET/CT scanning with STIR turbo SE imaging was found to be significantly more effective for detecting nodal involvement on a per-patient basis (97% specificity, 90% accuracy) than FDG PET/CT scanning alone (66% specificity, 82% accuracy).117

    • Diffusion-weighted MR imaging using FASE sequence for 3T MR system: Preliminary comparison of capability for N-stage assessment by means of diffusion-weighted MR imaging using EPI sequence, STIR FASE imaging and FDG PET/CT for non-small cell lung cancer patients

      2015, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Direct comparison of qualitatively assessed results obtained with STIR FASE imaging, FASE- and EPI-DWIs and PET/CT on a per-node basis revealed that STIR FASE imaging and FASE-DWI should be considered more sensitive and accurate than EPI-DWI or PET/CT, and that there are no significant differences between the former two methods on a per-node basis. These results as well as those of analyses of false-positive node findings are very similar to those reported elsewhere in the literature [5–8,10,11]. Our direct assessment of agreements regarding the N-stage as determined with the different methods suggests that each method demonstrated substantial or moderate agreements with the final diagnosis, although agreements for STIR FASE imaging and FASE-EPI were better than those for EPI-DWI and PET/CT.

    • Lung Cancer Assessment Using MR Imaging: An Update

      2015, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      On STIR turbo SE images, metastatic lymph nodes show high signal intensity and nonmetastatic lymph nodes demonstrate low signal intensity (Fig. 3). According to previously published results,44–49 sensitivity of quantitatively and qualitatively assessed STIR turbo SE imaging ranged, on a per-patient basis, from 83.7% to 100.0%, specificity from 75.0% to 93.1%, and accuracy from 86.0% to 92.2%, and these values were equal to or higher than those for CE CT, FDG-PET, or PET/CT. Yet another study showed that the quantitative and qualitative sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of STIR turbo SE imaging were not significantly different from FDG-PET/CT.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text