Original article
Vascular interventions during post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for metastatic testis cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-7983(98)80009-7Get rights and content

Aims

Complete excision of nodal masses during post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) for metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours (NSGCT) of the testis often requires vascular surgical intervention. We report our experience of vascular interventions and complications in a large series of men undergoing post-chemotherapy RPLND.

Methods

A retrospective review of vascular interventions during post-chemotherapy RPLND in 98 patients was undertaken (103 procedures).

Results

Macroscopic tumour clearance was complete in 95/98 men (97%). Vascular intervention was required in all cases. Major complications included acute tubular necrosis in one patient who had undergone left nephrectomy and extensive dissection around the right renal artery, progressive atrophy of the ipsilateral kidney in three men and a colonic stricture and associated colocutaneous fistula in one patient after division of the inferior mesenteric artery. Iliac and femoral venous thrombosis developed in both patients in whom the inferior vena cava (IVC) was excised and in one patient after partial IVC excision. Eight of the 98 patients have died. No late vascular complications have occurred to date.

Conclusion

Complete tumour clearance can be achieved in most post-chemotherapy RPLNDs but invariably involves vascular intervention. Metastatic NSGCT should be treated by surgeons with the ability to undertake the vascular procedures required.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (26)

  • Characterizing the Morbidity of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer in a National Cohort of Privately Insured Patients

    2016, Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Secondary outcomes included length of index hospital admission, discharge disposition (ie, self-care, other acute/subacute facility or skilled nursing facility [SNF], and deceased), and all-cause readmission in the 90 days following index surgical admission. We identified 9 possible adjunctive procedures that may be undertaken at the time of PC-RPLND a priori based on anticipated surgeries that may be necessary to ensure oncologic control, for the unexpected management of intraoperative complications, or for unexpected disease burden based on a literature review.5,8-11,16 We supplemented this with review of observed secondary procedure codes.

  • Residual tumor size and IGCCCG risk classification predict additional vascular procedures in patients with germ cell tumors and residual tumor resection: A multicenter analysis of the German testicular cancer study group

    2012, European Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The size and location of residual masses make RTR a technically demanding procedure that should be performed by experienced surgeons in dedicated referral centers [15]. Only a few studies have investigated the role of additional vascular procedures during RTR after chemotherapy [16–22]. Additional vascular interventions during RTR are high-risk procedures that require multidisciplinary planning and adequate resources to optimize outcome.

  • Complications of Lymphadenectomy in Urologic Surgery

    2011, Urologic Clinics of North America
  • Vena Caval Reconstruction During Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Metastatic Germ Cell Tumor

    2009, Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In this study, the rate of vena caval resection during PC-RPLND was 6.4%, similar to that of earlier reports.1,7 Also, as previously described, a predominance of right-sided primary testicular tumors was documented.1,6,7 All but 1 of our patients underwent infrarenal vena caval reconstruction after vena caval resection.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text