Research articleGraduate programs: What is their contribution to the training of the public health workforce?
Introduction
T he need for well-trained public health workers has never been greater. Well-documented threats, from bioterrorism to emerging infectious diseases and environmental contamination, face the nation.1 Recent reports and initiatives emphasize (1) the various educational and experiential paths leading to careers in public health; (2) the lack of formal education in public health by a majority of the public health workforce; (3) the aging of the public health workforce; and (4) the tremendous changes in the functions of the public health system.2, 3, 4, 5 The 1988 Institute of Medicine Report, The Future of Public Health,2 charged schools of public health and other educational institutions with educating new students and existing public health workers to assume leadership positions and to practice public health in new and different settings. What do we know about the academic public health institutions where this education occurs?
Academic public health encompasses the schools of public health (SPH), graduate programs in community health/preventive medicine (CHPM), and graduate programs in community health education (CHE). The Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) accredits all of these academic public health institutions, and the accreditation procedures for all institutions are the same. In 2000, Clark and Weist6 reported that approximately 4800 masters-prepared students completed their training in the 28 SPH existing at that time.
The CHPM programs offer masters degrees in a variety of concentrations and fields, while the CHE programs offer degrees solely in health education. Throughout the United States, the number of graduate public health programs is growing more rapidly than the schools of public health.7 The CHPM and CHE graduate programs are a vital resource for the training of the public health workforce; however, data on these programs have not been collected and published since 1994.8
CEPH defines three accreditation categories: accredited, pre-accredited, and applicant.9 Schools and programs have similar but distinct accreditation criteria.10, 11, 12 The differences follow:
- 1.
A school of public health must demonstrate organizational independence; that is, it must have the same status and independence afforded to other professional schools (e.g., medicine) at the university. A program can be housed within a school of medicine or another professional school.
- 2.
A school of public health must offer an MPH degree concentration in each of the five core disciplines: epidemiology, biostatistics, environmental health, the social and behavioral sciences, and health administration. A program can offer one or more MPH degrees in any discipline or a generalist emphasis.
- 3.
A school of public health must offer at least one doctoral degree. There is no such requirement for programs.
The accreditation criteria for schools and programs are otherwise the same. CEPH requires that accredited educational institutions periodically provide data as the basis for longer terms of accreditation. The data have consistent definitions and methodologies within each of the three sets of accreditation criteria. The Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine (ATPM), through its Council of Graduate Programs in Preventive Medicine and Public Health, facilitates collection of data on graduate programs.
In 1999, the Council of Graduate Programs decided to survey the CHE and CHPM programs in collaboration with CEPH. The Health Resources and Services Administration provided support to ATPM to identify the sample, create the survey instrument, analyze the data, and prepare the report. CEPH provided mailing services for the survey, created a database, and provided data entry services.
Section snippets
Creating the survey instrument
A committee of the Council of Graduate Programs created the survey instrument. The committee reviewed the 1994 graduate programs survey and the survey instrument used by the Association of Schools of Public Health to create an updated survey instrument with two sections. The first section queried data on degrees and concentrations offered; course formats; degree requirements; financial information; additional program offerings, such as residencies; and general information on students,
Response rate
Table 1 presents the number of responding and nonresponding programs by CEPH affiliation. Thirty-seven (82%) of the 45 CEPH-affiliated programs that had students during the period surveyed returned the survey. For fully accredited programs, the response rate was 79%. Twenty-two (85%) of the 26 CHPM-accredited programs and 8 of the 12 (67%) CHE-accredited programs returned the survey. All CHPM pre-accredited programs and one third of the applicant programs (two CHPM and one CHE) responded to the
Findings
With more than 3000 students seeking MPH degrees, the CHPM and CHE graduate programs are training a significant number of public health students. These programs add more than 700 MPH graduates a year to the 4800 reported by the schools of public health,6 with one out of every eight MPH degrees awarded by a graduate program.
Two thirds of the students in these programs continued to work while studying for their masters degree, with almost half working full-time. More than half of the students
Conclusion
This survey provides an overall picture of how 40 graduate programs in public health contribute to educating the future public health workforce. In states or cities lacking schools of public health, the graduate programs provide the only graduate-level training for many students interested in entering public health and continuing education for current public health employees. While some institutions may start with a graduate program and later transition to a school of public health, other
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine (ATPM)/Health Resources and Services Administration cooperative agreement 6U76AH000001. The Council on Education for Public Health provided in-kind services to support this effort. We are grateful to Antigone Recachinas, MPH, and Patricia Evans of the Council on Education for Public Health for their support and assistance of this effort. We also acknowledge the work of the ATPM Council of Graduate Programs in creating
References (15)
A threat to the public health workforceevidence from trends in preventive medicine certification and training
Am J Prev Med
(2000)- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC/ATSDR strategic plan for public health: workforce development summary....
- Institute of Medicine. The future of public health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press,...
- Health Resources and Services Administration. Health personnel in the United States: eighth report to Congress....
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health’s infrastructure: every health department fully prepared;...
- et al.
Mastering the new public health
Am J Public Health
(2000) - Evans P. Alive and well? Yes! Presented at Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine 59th Annual Meeting,...